Literature DB >> 10322049

Sensitivity to simulated directional sound motion in the rat primary auditory cortex.

D E Doan1, J C Saunders.   

Abstract

Sensitivity to simulated directional sound motion in the rat primary auditory cortex. This paper examines neuron responses in rat primary auditory cortex (AI) during sound stimulation of the two ears designed to simulate sound motion in the horizontal plane. The simulated sound motion was synthesized from mathematical equations that generated dynamic changes in interaural phase, intensity, and Doppler shifts at the two ears. The simulated sounds were based on moving sources in the right frontal horizontal quadrant. Stimuli consisted of three circumferential segments between 0 and 30 degrees, 30 and 60 degrees, and 60 and 90 degrees and four radial segments at 0, 30, 60, and 90 degrees. The constant velocity portion of each segment was 0.84 m long. The circumferential segments and center of the radial segments were calculated to simulate a distance of 2 m from the head. Each segment had two trajectories that simulated motion in both directions, and each trajectory was presented at two velocities. Young adult rats were anesthetized, the left primary auditory cortex was exposed, and microelectrode recordings were obtained from sound responsive cells in AI. All testing took place at a tonal frequency that most closely approximated the best frequency of the unit at a level 20 dB above the tuning curve threshold. The results were presented on polar plots that emphasized the two directions of simulated motion for each segment rather than the location of sound in space. The trajectory exhibiting a "maximum motion response" could be identified from these plots. "Neuron discharge profiles" within these trajectories were used to demonstrate neuron activity for the two motion directions. Cells were identified that clearly responded to simulated uni- or multidirectional sound motion (39%), that were sensitive to sound location only (19%), or that were sound driven but insensitive to our location or sound motion stimuli (42%). The results demonstrated the capacity of neurons in rat auditory cortex to selectively process dynamic stimulus conditions representing simulated motion on the horizontal plane. Our data further show that some cells were responsive to location along the horizontal plane but not sensitive to motion. Cells sensitive to motion, however, also responded best to the moving sound at a particular location within the trajectory. It would seem that the mechanisms underlying sensitivity to sound location as well as direction of motion converge on the same cell.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10322049     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.5.2075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  7 in total

1.  Responses of cat primary auditory cortex neurons to moving stimuli with dynamically changing interaural delays.

Authors:  N I Nikitin; A L Varfolomeev; L M Kotelenko
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-11

2.  Functional subdivisions in low-frequency primary auditory cortex (AI).

Authors:  M N Wallace; A R Palmer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Evoked Response Strength in Primary Auditory Cortex Predicts Performance in a Spectro-Spatial Discrimination Task in Rats.

Authors:  Elena Gronskaya; Wolfger von der Behrens
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Representation of Auditory Motion Directions and Sound Source Locations in the Human Planum Temporale.

Authors:  Ceren Battal; Mohamed Rezk; Stefania Mattioni; Jyothirmayi Vadlamudi; Olivier Collignon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Pattern of localisation error in patients with stroke to sound processed by a binaural sound space processor.

Authors:  S Sonoda; M Mori; A Goishi
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Optical imaging of interaural time difference representation in rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Vassiliy Tsytsarev; Hidenao Fukuyama; Daniel Pope; Elena Pumbo; Minoru Kimura
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2009-03-02

Review 7.  The Perception of Auditory Motion.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Johahn Leung
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.