P Rose1, E Humm, K Hey, L Jones, S M Huson. 1. ICRF General Practice Research Group, Division of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Oxford, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of taking routine family histories and subsequent counselling. METHODS: The study was set in primary care in the UK. The subjects were patients between the ages of 20 and 34 years registered at one general practice. Patients were invited by letter to attend a clinic in their GP surgery, run by a GP and health visitor. A family history was constructed and counselling undertaken for any identified problems. A telephone survey of a sample of nonattenders was also performed. The outcome measures were attendance rate, patient views, patient anxiety as measured by the short form of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and referrals to secondary care. RESULTS: In total, 16.1% patients attended the clinic; 40.3 % had a family history of at least one disease with a possible genetic component. Anxiety levels fell immediately after the consultation and rose to pre-clinic levels at 12 weeks. The clinic generated three referrals to secondary care and a further seven patients who were counselled by the investigators following advice from a consultant geneticist. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to take detailed family histories and provide genetic counselling advice in primary care with minimal training of clinical primary care staff. The service is acceptable to patients, does not induce anxiety and has little effect on numbers of patients referred.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of taking routine family histories and subsequent counselling. METHODS: The study was set in primary care in the UK. The subjects were patients between the ages of 20 and 34 years registered at one general practice. Patients were invited by letter to attend a clinic in their GP surgery, run by a GP and health visitor. A family history was constructed and counselling undertaken for any identified problems. A telephone survey of a sample of nonattenders was also performed. The outcome measures were attendance rate, patient views, patientanxiety as measured by the short form of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and referrals to secondary care. RESULTS: In total, 16.1% patients attended the clinic; 40.3 % had a family history of at least one disease with a possible genetic component. Anxiety levels fell immediately after the consultation and rose to pre-clinic levels at 12 weeks. The clinic generated three referrals to secondary care and a further seven patients who were counselled by the investigators following advice from a consultant geneticist. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to take detailed family histories and provide genetic counselling advice in primary care with minimal training of clinical primary care staff. The service is acceptable to patients, does not induce anxiety and has little effect on numbers of patients referred.
Authors: Peter W Rose; Michael Murphy; Marcus Munafo; Cyril Chapman; Neil Mortensen; Anneke Lucassen Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Sean M Blaine; June C Carroll; Andrea L Rideout; Gord Glendon; Wendy Meschino; Cheryl Shuman; Deanna Telner; Natasha Van Iderstine; Joanne Permaul Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2008-01-30 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: L C de Jong-Potjer; J Elsinga; S le Cessie; K M van der Pal-de Bruin; A Knuistingh Neven; S E Buitendijk; W J J Assendelft Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2006-11-03 Impact factor: 2.497