Literature DB >> 10321363

Outcomes of universal antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies.

P Greengross1, M Hickman, M Gill, B Dugan, S C Davies.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate universal antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies.
SETTING: District general hospital serving a London borough with 45% ethnic minorities.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 1444 women referred in 1688 pregnancies and 95 tertiary referrals during 101 pregnancies.
RESULTS: Unselected women at risk for sickle cell disease booked 2.7 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 5.1) later in gestation than those at risk for beta thalassaemia were less likely to attend counselling (83% v 93%, relative risk (RR) 0.89; 95% CI 0.85 to 0.94), their partners were less likely to be tested (77% v 95%, RR 0.81; 0.77 to 0.83), and they were less likely to accept prenatal diagnosis (22% v 90%, RR 0.37; 0.24 to 0.57). Over 99% of tertiary referrals attended counselling and had their partners tested. There were no significant differences in acceptance of prenatal diagnosis between those at risk of sickle cell disease and beta thalassaemia (55% v 67%). Unselected women at risk of sickle cell disease were significantly less likely to have their partner tested or to accept prenatal diagnosis than tertiary referrals, but not those at risk of beta thalassaemia. 80% of beta thalassaemia and 16% of SS births were prevented.
CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of prenatal diagnosis among unselected women at risk of beta thalassaemia is similar to that reported by tertiary centres. It is considerably lower for sickle cell disease but could increase considerably if screening occurred earlier in gestation. Acceptance of counselling is universally high, suggesting that informed choices are made, and indicating a need to measure these outcomes for cost effectiveness studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10321363     DOI: 10.1136/jms.6.1.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  7 in total

Review 1.  Carrier screening for beta-thalassaemia: a review of international practice.

Authors:  Nicole E Cousens; Clara L Gaff; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  A stochastic model to evaluate options for antenatal genetic screening.

Authors:  Steve Gallivan; Mark Jit; Martin Utley
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2006-05

3.  Delay between pregnancy confirmation and sickle cell and [corrected] thalassaemia screening: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dormandy; Martin C Gulliford; Erin P Reid; Katrina Brown; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Parents' experiences of universal screening for haemoglobin disorders: implications for practice in a new genetics era.

Authors:  Louise Locock; Joe Kai
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Effectiveness of earlier antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care: cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dormandy; Martin Gulliford; Stirling Bryan; Tracy E Roberts; Michael Calnan; Karl Atkin; Jonathan Karnon; Jane Logan; Fred Kavalier; Hilary J Harris; Tracey A Johnston; Elizabeth N Anionwu; Vicki Tsianakas; Patricia Jones; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-10-05

6.  Impact on informed choice of offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening in primary care: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Katrina Brown; Elizabeth Dormandy; Erin Reid; Martin Gulliford; Theresa Marteau
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.136

7.  Red blood cell parameters in antenatal nonsickling hemoglobinopathy screening.

Authors:  Gabriela Bencaiova; Kristina Dapoto; Roland Zimmermann; Alexander Krafft
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-04-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.