Literature DB >> 10321295

[The practice of systematic reviews. I. Introduction].

M Offringa1, A J de Craen.   

Abstract

A systematic review of the results of randomized, controlled trials employs explicit, systematic methods to produce unbiased and precise estimates of the effect of a treatment on outcomes of clinical importance. The results of such systematic reviews are of importance in that they inform providers and consumers about the effect of treatments and identify priorities for new research. The Cochrane Collaboration is a systematic programme to try to harness this valuable information. An overview of the actual status of systematic reviews of health care interventions is given and a miniseries of papers on systematic reviews is introduced.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10321295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd        ISSN: 0028-2162


  3 in total

Review 1.  Controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair: a review of literature.

Authors:  W A Draaisma; H G Gooszen; E Tournoij; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Evaluation of effective return-to-work treatment programs for sick-listed patients with non-specific musculoskeletal complaints: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eline M Meijer; Judith K Sluiter; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Evaluating the relationship between citation set size, team size and screening methods used in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Katie O'Hearn; Cameron MacDonald; Anne Tsampalieros; Leo Kadota; Ryan Sandarage; Supun Kotteduwa Jayawarden; Michele Datko; John M Reynolds; Thanh Bui; Shagufta Sultan; Margaret Sampson; Misty Pratt; Nick Barrowman; Nassr Nama; Matthew Page; James Dayre McNally
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.