BACKGROUND: The use of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels as a risk factor for coronary heart disease necessitates an accurate and precise method for measuring HDL-C. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HDL-C reference method (RM) and designated comparison method (DCM) are time-consuming, expensive, and impractical for routine clinical use. We evaluated the Liquid N-geneous (LN-gen) HDL-C assay (Genzyme Diagnostics, Cambridge, Mass) to determine if this homogeneous reagent meets the National Cholesterol Education Program requirements for HDL-C evaluation. DESIGN: Accuracy of the LN-gen HDL-C assay was compared in combination with phosphotungstic acid (PTA) precipitation with DCM HDL-C for normotriglyceridemic serum specimens (triglycerides < 2.0 g/L) and with RM HDL-C for specimens with triglycerides levels > or = 2.0 g/L. SETTING: Genzyme Diagnostics (with RM and DCM assayed by Pacific BioMetrics Inc, Seattle, Wash) and the Lipid Reference Laboratory of the University Hospital Rotterdam, The Netherlands. RESULTS: Linear regression to DCM (n = 90) was (LN-gen = 1.015 DCM + 0.01 g/L, r = 0.993, SE = 0.015 g/L) and (PTA = 1.004 DCM - 0.017 g/L, r = 0.980, SE = 0.025 g/L), with a mean percent bias to DCM of 3.3% and -2.8% for LN-gen and PTA, respectively. The comparison with RM (n = 69) showed an increased mean bias for PTA (-5.8%) as compared with LN-gen (1.5%). The correlation and regression equations were (LN-gen = 1.020 RM - 0.002 g/L, r = 0.985, SE = 0.017 g/L) and (PTA = 1.042 RM - 0.032 g/L, r = 0.984, SE = 0.018 g/L). The precision of LN-gen was confirmed at < 2.1% coefficient of variation, and the total error was calculated to be < or = 7.7% for both normotriglyceride and elevated triglyceride specimens at HDL-C decision points of 0.35 g/L and 0.60 g/L. CONCLUSIONS: The LN-gen HDL-C assay offers a cost-effective convenient method for meeting the 1998 precision, bias, and total error recommendations of the National Cholesterol Education Program.
BACKGROUND: The use of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels as a risk factor for coronary heart disease necessitates an accurate and precise method for measuring HDL-C. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HDL-C reference method (RM) and designated comparison method (DCM) are time-consuming, expensive, and impractical for routine clinical use. We evaluated the Liquid N-geneous (LN-gen) HDL-C assay (Genzyme Diagnostics, Cambridge, Mass) to determine if this homogeneous reagent meets the National Cholesterol Education Program requirements for HDL-C evaluation. DESIGN: Accuracy of the LN-gen HDL-C assay was compared in combination with phosphotungstic acid (PTA) precipitation with DCM HDL-C for normotriglyceridemic serum specimens (triglycerides < 2.0 g/L) and with RM HDL-C for specimens with triglycerides levels > or = 2.0 g/L. SETTING: Genzyme Diagnostics (with RM and DCM assayed by Pacific BioMetrics Inc, Seattle, Wash) and the Lipid Reference Laboratory of the University Hospital Rotterdam, The Netherlands. RESULTS: Linear regression to DCM (n = 90) was (LN-gen = 1.015 DCM + 0.01 g/L, r = 0.993, SE = 0.015 g/L) and (PTA = 1.004 DCM - 0.017 g/L, r = 0.980, SE = 0.025 g/L), with a mean percent bias to DCM of 3.3% and -2.8% for LN-gen and PTA, respectively. The comparison with RM (n = 69) showed an increased mean bias for PTA (-5.8%) as compared with LN-gen (1.5%). The correlation and regression equations were (LN-gen = 1.020 RM - 0.002 g/L, r = 0.985, SE = 0.017 g/L) and (PTA = 1.042 RM - 0.032 g/L, r = 0.984, SE = 0.018 g/L). The precision of LN-gen was confirmed at < 2.1% coefficient of variation, and the total error was calculated to be < or = 7.7% for both normotriglyceride and elevated triglyceride specimens at HDL-C decision points of 0.35 g/L and 0.60 g/L. CONCLUSIONS: The LN-gen HDL-C assay offers a cost-effective convenient method for meeting the 1998 precision, bias, and total error recommendations of the National Cholesterol Education Program.
Authors: W Greg Miller; Gary L Myers; Ikunosuke Sakurabayashi; Lorin M Bachmann; Samuel P Caudill; Andrzej Dziekonski; Selvin Edwards; Mary M Kimberly; William J Korzun; Elizabeth T Leary; Katsuyuki Nakajima; Masakazu Nakamura; Göran Nilsson; Robert D Shamburek; George W Vetrovec; G Russell Warnick; Alan T Remaley Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Saverio Stranges; Martin Laclaustra; Chen Ji; Francesco P Cappuccio; Ana Navas-Acien; Jose M Ordovas; Margaret Rayman; Eliseo Guallar Journal: J Nutr Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Wei Zhao; Carolyn Chaffin; Renee A Desmond; Bruce Hodges; Thomas M Daly; C Andrew Robinson; Robert W Hardy Journal: J Clin Lab Anal Date: 2004 Impact factor: 2.352