OBJECTIVES: To document the level of involvement and communication with nonpathology clinical personnel regarding autopsies and to document the destination of autopsy reports. DESIGN: The College of American Pathologists Q-Probes format was used to collect information on 15 consecutively performed autopsies per institution or for 6 months, whichever occurred first. The following information was recorded for each autopsy: decedent's age, hospital service, length of hospital stay, whether organs were donated, who was present at autopsy, methods of communicating preliminary and final autopsy results, special techniques used to arrive at a preliminary diagnosis, activities for which the autopsy was used, and destination of final report. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-six laboratories collected information on 2755 autopsies. RESULTS: The aggregate autopsy rate was 12.4% (median 8.5%). Nonpathology clinical personnel attended 35.8% of all autopsies. A clinical physician was more likely to attend an autopsy if the patient was from a surgical service. Three primary methods were used to communicate preliminary autopsy results, namely, written reports (82.5%), telephone calls (50.6%), and meetings (11.5%). The primary care physician was sent the autopsy report in 91.1% of cases. Approximately half of the autopsy cases were used in both pathology departmental and extradepartmental activities. Aggregate autopsy data were distributed in the majority of cases to various departmental chairpersons and institutional quality assurance committees. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comparative multiinstitutional database for the utilization of autopsy results by clinicians and clinical departments. Although autopsy rates are low, autopsy results are routinely being used for hospital quality assurance activities and for educational purposes.
OBJECTIVES: To document the level of involvement and communication with nonpathology clinical personnel regarding autopsies and to document the destination of autopsy reports. DESIGN: The College of American Pathologists Q-Probes format was used to collect information on 15 consecutively performed autopsies per institution or for 6 months, whichever occurred first. The following information was recorded for each autopsy: decedent's age, hospital service, length of hospital stay, whether organs were donated, who was present at autopsy, methods of communicating preliminary and final autopsy results, special techniques used to arrive at a preliminary diagnosis, activities for which the autopsy was used, and destination of final report. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-six laboratories collected information on 2755 autopsies. RESULTS: The aggregate autopsy rate was 12.4% (median 8.5%). Nonpathology clinical personnel attended 35.8% of all autopsies. A clinical physician was more likely to attend an autopsy if the patient was from a surgical service. Three primary methods were used to communicate preliminary autopsy results, namely, written reports (82.5%), telephone calls (50.6%), and meetings (11.5%). The primary care physician was sent the autopsy report in 91.1% of cases. Approximately half of the autopsy cases were used in both pathology departmental and extradepartmental activities. Aggregate autopsy data were distributed in the majority of cases to various departmental chairpersons and institutional quality assurance committees. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comparative multiinstitutional database for the utilization of autopsy results by clinicians and clinical departments. Although autopsy rates are low, autopsy results are routinely being used for hospital quality assurance activities and for educational purposes.
Authors: Sheri L Spunt; Sara O Vargas; Cheryl M Coffin; Stephen X Skapek; David M Parham; Joan Darling; Douglas S Hawkins; Charles Keller Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 6.860