Literature DB >> 10320108

Low-frequency modulation of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the human ear.

G Scholz1, A Hirschfelder, T Marquardt, J Hensel, D Mrowinski.   

Abstract

Low-frequency masking is a recent clinical procedure for the differential diagnosis of sensory hearing loss. Currently this requires the recording of the phase-dependent masked subjective threshold, which is time consuming and not always accurate. As an objective method, the recording of modulated distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) can be performed continuously, and with better frequency specificity. Results of measurements of the low-frequency modulated two-tone DPOAE 2f1-f2 in the human ear, and its dependence on various acoustic parameters, are presented here for the first time. Similar to the masked hearing threshold, the pattern of the phase-dependent modulated DPOAEs displayed two minima, at the phases of maximal rarefaction and condensation, respectively, with a latency of about 4 ms (suppressor frequency 32.8 Hz). The smaller dip, at maximal condensation, appeared only for a high suppressor level, and for a low level of the primary tone f2. The modulating effect measured for the primary frequencies f1 = 2.5 kHz and f2 = 3 kHz, decreased for 4 and 4.8 kHz, and vanished for 5 and 6 kHz. The results are discussed using a cubic distortion model based on the Boltzmann function for mechano-electrical transduction of the hair cells. The saturation behavior of the increase of the DPOAE level at different phases is compared with the growth rates of the DPOAE level in normal hearing and in sensory hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10320108     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00010-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  8 in total

1.  Concurrent Acoustic Activation of the Medial Olivocochlear System Modifies the After-Effects of Intense Low-Frequency Sound on the Human Inner Ear.

Authors:  Kathrin Kugler; Lutz Wiegrebe; Robert Gürkov; Eike Krause; Markus Drexl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-12

2.  [Proof of endolymphatic hydrops].

Authors:  S Hoth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Low-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission test compared to ECoG in diagnosing endolymphatic hydrops.

Authors:  A Rotter; S Weikert; J Hensel; G Scholz; H Scherer; M Hölzl
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Kelly L Watts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  [Diagnosis of endolymphatic hydrops using low frequency modulated distortion product otoacoustic emissions].

Authors:  A Hirschfelder; E Gossow-Müller-Hohenstein; J Hensel; G Scholz; D Mrowinski
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Low-frequency modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Nicole M Scherrer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The Spectral Extent of Phasic Suppression of Loudness and Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions by Infrasound and Low-Frequency Tones.

Authors:  Carlos Jurado; Man Yui Pat Chow; Ka Man Lydia Leung; Marcelo Larrea; Juan Vizuete; Alain de Cheveigné; Torsten Marquardt
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-02-07

8.  High-multiple spontaneous otoacoustic emissions confirm theory of local tuned oscillators.

Authors:  Martin Braun
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-03-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.