Literature DB >> 10319774

Women emerge from general anesthesia with propofol/alfentanil/nitrous oxide faster than men.

T J Gan1, P S Glass, J Sigl, P Sebel, F Payne, C Rosow, P Embree.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recovery from general anesthesia is governed by pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic factors. Gender has not previously been recognized as a factor influencing the time to emergence from general anesthesia.
METHODS: This multicenter study was originally designed to measure the effects of the bispectral index on intraoperative anesthetic management and patient recovery. We compared the wake-up and recovery times of 274 adults after propofol/alfentanil/nitrous oxide anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to have the titration of propofol performed with or without the use of bispectral index monitoring. Specific guidelines were given for the titration of drugs. The aim in all cases was to provide a safe anesthetic with the fastest possible recovery.
RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in propofol dose, time to eye opening, and response to verbal command when the anesthetic was titrated using the bispectral index. Unexpectedly, gender proved to be a highly significant independent predictor for recovery time. Women woke significantly faster than men: the time from end of anesthesia to eye opening was 7.05 versus 11.22 min, P < 0.05, and response to verbal command was 8.12 versus 11.67 min, P < 0.05. These differences were significant at all four study sites and in each treatment group. Men consistently had prolonged recovery times compared to women, P < 0.001. There was no difference in the dose of anesthetic used between gender.
CONCLUSIONS: Gender appears to be an important variable in recovery from general anesthesia. These findings may explain the increased reported incidence of awareness in women (three times more frequent) and support the need to include gender as a variable in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of anesthetic drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10319774     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199905000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  32 in total

1.  Sex differences in speed of emergence and quality of recovery after anaesthesia: cohort study.

Authors:  P S Myles; A D McLeod; J O Hunt; H Fletcher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-24

2.  Neural network modeling to predict the hypnotic effect of propofol bolus induction.

Authors:  Chao-Shun Lin; Yu-Chuan Li; Martin S Mok; Chi-Chen Wu; Hung-Wen Chiu; Yu-Hwa Lin
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

Review 3.  Anesthesia awareness: narrative review of psychological sequelae, treatment, and incidence.

Authors:  Robin R Bruchas; Christopher D Kent; Hilary D Wilson; Karen B Domino
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2011-09

4.  Influence of sex on propofol metabolism, a pilot study: implications for propofol anesthesia.

Authors:  Irena Loryan; Marja Lindqvist; Inger Johansson; Masahiro Hiratsuka; Ilse van der Heiden; Ron H N van Schaik; Jan Jakobsson; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Gender-specific differences in the central nervous system's response to anesthesia.

Authors:  Lana J Mawhinney; Davita Mabourakh; Michael C Lewis
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 6.829

6.  Distinct, sex-dependent miRNA signatures in piglet hippocampus induced by a clinically relevant isoflurane exposure: a pilot study.

Authors:  Emmett E Whitaker; Brianne Z Wiemann; Jason C Xia; Bruno Bissonnette; Joseph Liu; Paolo Fadda; Joseph D Tobias; Fievos L Christofi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  The Duration of Nerve Block from Local Anesthetic Formulations in Male and Female Rats.

Authors:  Kathleen Cullion; Laura C Petishnok; Tianjiao Ji; David Zurakowski; Daniel S Kohane
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Risk factors with intravenous sedation for patients with disabilities.

Authors:  Fumihiro Yoshikawa; Yoh Tamaki; Hisa Okumura; Zenzo Miwa; Masaaki Ishikawa; Kazuhiro Shimoyama; Zenkou Nakamura; Hitomi Kunimori; Shigeharu Jinno; Hikaru Kohase; Haruhisa Fukayama
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2013

9.  Impact of clinical factors and UGT1A9 and CYP2B6 genotype on inter-individual differences in propofol pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Akihiro Kanaya; Toshihiro Sato; Nobuo Fuse; Hiroaki Yamaguchi; Nariyasu Mano; Masanori Yamauchi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Titration of the plasma effect site equilibrium rate constant of propofol; a link method of 'Concentration-Probability-Time'.

Authors:  Jong-Yeop Kim; Sung-Yong Park; Sun-Kyung Park; Jin-Soo Kim; Sang-Kee Min
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.