Literature DB >> 10313327

Cost-effectiveness index (CEI): a tool to help evaluate mental health programs.

M Rappaport.   

Abstract

A method for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of mental health programs is presented. The method takes into account the profile of mental health services a patient receives, the frequency of each service and the relative costs of each service in relation to the change in a patient's clinical condition between entrance into and release from a treatment program. It can also be used to assess change over a specified time period. An example compares the cost-effectiveness index (CEI) for similar cohorts of schizophrenia patients treated in two 24-hour acute care psychiatric systems. The CEI can use either actual dollar costs, if known, or a relative value scale associated with different services. Its utility and weaknesses are discussed. The CEI is designed to alert management to differences in the relative cost-effectiveness of programs serving populations of similar patients. Identification of such differences can contribute to improvement in program functioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 10313327     DOI: 10.1007/bf02521387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ment Health Adm        ISSN: 0092-8623


  6 in total

Review 1.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  The psychiatric health facility: an alternative for acute inpatient treatment in a nonhospital setting.

Authors:  S Moltzen; H Gurevitz; M Rappaport; H H Goldman
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1986-11

3.  A method for comparing two systems of acute 24-hour psychiatric care.

Authors:  M Rappaport; H Goldman; P Thornton; B Stegner; S Moltzen; K Hall; H Gurevitz; C C Attkisson
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1987-10

4.  Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices.

Authors:  M C Weinstein; W B Stason
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A comparison of analysis of covariance and the theta technique as applied to illustrative psychopharmacological data.

Authors:  D C Ross; D F Klein
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  What. Another rating scale? The psychiatric evaluation form.

Authors:  J Endicott; R L Spitzer
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 2.254

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.