Literature DB >> 10310847

Demographic characteristics and health care use and expenditures by the aged in the United States: 1977-1984.

D R Waldo, H C Lazenby.   

Abstract

In recent years, increasing attention has been given to the use and financing of health care for the aged. The authors of this article summarize much of the data related to that use, and present original estimates of health spending in 1984 on behalf of the aged. The estimates are designed to indicate trends in health expenditures and are tied to aggregate personal health care expenditures from the National Health Accounts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 10310847      PMCID: PMC4191459     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev        ISSN: 0195-8631


Overview

Spending for health care has become a source of concern for increasing numbers of Americans. From 1977 through 1982, annual personal health care expenditures for all Americans rose at an annual rate of 14 percent, 1 ½ times the rate of growth of the gross national product (Gibson, Waldo, and Levit, 1983). Over that same period, that part of the gross national product used to provide health care goods and services, research, construction, and administration rose from 8.8 percent to 10.5 percent; despite cost containment measures in both the public and private sectors, this upward trend is expected to continue. Perhaps no group of Americans has a greater stake in the issues raised by the rapid growth of health care spending than the elderly—those 65 years of age or over. The elderly consume a share of the Nation's health care that is disproportionate to their numbers. They have been growing (and will continue to grow) both in numbers and as a proportion of the total population. In 1977, per capita health care spending for people 65 years of age or over was, on the average, 3½ times that for the total population (Fisher, 1980); that ratio is higher today than it was in 1977. Increased numbers of the elderly and increased spending per capita on their behalf have placed enormous pressure on the Medicare program—the financing mechanism through which almost half of the funds for their care flow. The viability of this program, its cost to American workers and taxpayers, and the effects that potential changes in the program would have upon the beneficiary population have sensitized the aged and the Nation to the future of health care spending as never before in modern history.

Demographic characteristics of the aged population

The aged population has increased both in numbers and as a proportion of the total population. There were 27 million people, or 11.7 percent of the total population, 65 years of age or over in the United States in 1983, compared with 23 million, or 10.8 percent of the total population in 1977 (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1982, May 1984). The aged are living longer. Life expectancy at age 65 was 16.8 years in 1982, up from 16.4 years in 1977 (Table 1). Despite large increases in the number of “recently aged” people (those 65-69), the median age of the aged population rose from 71.6 in 1977 to 71.9 in 1983, reflecting lower death rates for people over 85 years of age.
Table 1

Life expectancy at birth and at 65 years of age, by sex: United States, selected years 1900-1982

YearAt birthAt 65 years


Both sexesMaleFemaleBoth sexesMaleFemale
19001, 247.346.348.311.911.512.2
1950 268.265.671.113.912.815.0
1960 269.766.673.114.312.815.8
197070.967.174.815.213.117.0
197171.167.475.015.213.217.1
197271.267.475.115.213.117.1
197371.467.675.315.313.217.2
197472.068.275.915.613.417.5
197572.668.876.616.113.818.1
197672.969.176.816.113.818.1
197773.369.577.216.414.018.4
197873.569.677.316.414.118.4
197973.970.077.816.714.318.7
198073.770.077.516.414.118.3
1981 374.170.377.916.714.318.7
1982 374.570.878.216.814.418.8

Death registration area only. The death registration area increased from 10 States and the District of Columbia in 1900 to the coterminous United States in 1933.

Includes deaths of nonresidents of the United States.

Provisional data.

SOURCE: National Center for Health Statistics: Health United States, 1983. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 84-1232. Public Health Service. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office, Dec. 1983.

The death rate for the aged has been falling steadily, especially for women (Figure 1). The overall age-adjusted death rate for people 65 years of age or over fell 29 percent during 1950-82. The death rate for males in 1980 ranged from 34 deaths per 1,000 men aged 65-69 years to 188 per 1,000 men aged 85 years or over, approximately a quarter less than 1940 rates. Rates for females dropped 35 to 50 percent, ranging from 17 deaths per 1,000 women 65-69 years to 148 per 1,000 women 85 years or over (National Center for Health Statistics, 1984). Some causes of death have become relatively less frequent than others; for example, from 1950 through 1982 the age-adjusted death rate for the aged attributable to diseases of the heart fell 34 percent and that for cerebrovascular diseases dropped 56 percent; however, the rate for malignant neoplasms rose 15 percent (National Center for Health Statistics, 1983a).
Figure 1

Age-adjusted death rates for persons 65 years of age or over, by sex: United States, 1940-78

During 1977-83, there was little change in the employment status of the aged population. Data from a sample of the U.S. noninstitutional population show a decline in the proportion of the population 65 years of age or over still in the labor force, from 13.1 percent in 1977 to 11.7 percent in 1983 (Table 2). The unemployment rate for this age group was 3.7 percent in 1983, up slightly from previous years but lower than in 1977. As time progressed from 1977 through 1983, the employed elderly were found more frequently in nonagricultural wage and salary jobs, and less frequently in agricultural and household jobs (Table 3). Almost half the employed elderly were part-time workers by choice, and another third held full-time jobs of 40 hours or less per week (Table 4). Reflecting the recent economic recession, slightly fewer of the employed elderly worked more than 40 hours a week in 1983 than in 1977, and slightly more were employed part time. Of the population 60 years of age or over not in the labor force, almost 90 percent were retired or keeping house; there was a decline in the proportion who withdrew from the labor force because of illness or disability, to about 7 percent in 1983 (Table 5).
Table 2

Number and percent distribution of the noninstitutional population 65 years of age or over, by average employment status: United States, 1977-1983

YearCivilian noninstitutional populationCivilian labor forceTotalNot in the labor force

TotalEmployedUnemployed


TotalPercent of labor forceKeeping houseGoing to schoolUnable to workOther reasons
Numbers in thousands
197722,2642,9092,7621475.119,3559,832111,0358,477
197822,7893,0432,9191244.119,7469,90381,0308,805
197923,3443,0732,9691043.420,2719,863141,0799,315
198023,8913,0212,927943.120,8709,896111,0369,927
198124,3793,0072,910973.221,3729,86571,00910,491
198225,3883,0292,9221073.522,35910,249696311,141
198325,8933,0412,9271143.722,85210,3371196111,543
Percent distribution
1977100.013.112.40.786.944.2.04.638.1
1978100.013.412.80.586.643.5.04.538.6
1979100.013.212.70.486.842.30.14.639.9
1980100.012.612.30.487.441.4.04.341.6
1981100.012.311.90.487.740.5.04.143.0
1982100.011.911.50.488.140.4.03.843.9
1983100.011.711.30.488.339.9.03.744.6

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics: Household data from the Current Population Survey, 1977-1984.

Table 3

Number and percent distribution of employed persons 65 years of age or over, by class of worker: United States, 1977-1983

YearTotalNonagricultural industriesAgriculture


Wage and salary workersSelf employedUnpaid family workersWage and salary workersSelf employedUnpaid family workers

TotalPrivate household workersGovernmentOther
Number in thousands
19772,7631,8951723021,421503256325720
19782,9192,0181813031,534522257626216
19792,9692,0761733371,566540267823316
19802,9282,0711503581,564533195923213
19812,9132,0441413371,567547195023715
19822,9222,0511403371,574556194523912
19832,9262,0541303371,587566214522416
Percent distribution
1977100.068.66.210.951.418.20.92.39.30.7
1978100.069.16.210.452.617.90.92.69.00.5
1979100.069.95.811.452.718.20.92.67.80.5
1980100.070.75.112.253.418.20.62.07.90.4
1981100.070.24.811.653.818.80.71.78.10.5
1982100.070.24.811.553.919.00.71.58.20.4
1983100.070.24.411.554.219.30.71.57.70.5

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics: Household data from the Current Population Survey, 1977-1984.

Table 4

Number and percent distribution of persons 65 years of age or over at work in nonagricultural industries, by full- or part-time status: United States, 1977-1983

YearTotal at workOn part time for economic reasonsOn voluntary part timeOn full-time schedulesAverage hours


Total40 hours or less41 hours or moreAll workersWorkers on full-time schedules
Number in thousands
19772,201871,0711,04370733629.143.1
19782,334981,1511,08573634928.642.8
19792,4041021,1691,13379833529.042.4
19802,391991,1641,12878634229.042.5
19812,377991,1511,12780632128.942.0
19822,3891211,1461,12280132129.142.5
19832,4081181,1541,13680333329.242.7
Percent distribution
1977100.04.048.747.432.115.3
1978100.04.249.346.531.515.0
1979100.04.248.647.133.213.9
1980100.04.148.747.232.914.3
1981100.04.248.447.433.913.5
1982100.05.148.047.033.513.4
1983100.04.947.947.233.313.8

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics: Household data from the Current Population Survey, 1977-1984.

Table 5

Number and percent distribution of persons 60 years of age or over not in the labor force, by job desire and reasons not seeking work: United States, 1977-1983

Item1977197819791980198119821983
Number in thousands
Total not in labor force24,27024,72525,29426,08226,84528,17628,747
 Do not want a job now23,67224,13224,74925,54626,30227,57328,195
  Current activity: Going to school18112215121021
  III, disabled2,1772,1832,1962,0762,0441,9851,898
  Keeping house12,17612,17712,18812,35212,29112,84512,962
  Retired8,7699,1589,72810,50511,33512,04312,679
  Other532603615598620690635
 Want a job now588594544537543601556
  Reason for not looking: School attendance3346437
  III health, disability174177170155164168147
  Home responsibilities38413338343237
  Think cannot get a job:214180152176181238212
  Job market factors9374687488131109
  Personal factors1221068310392107103
  Other reasons159193185162160160153
Percent distribution
Total not in labor force100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
 Do not want a job now97.597.697.897.998.097.998.1
  Current activity: Going to school0.1.00.10.1.0.00.1
  III, disabled9.08.88.78.07.67.06.6
  Keeping house50.249.248.247.445.845.645.1
  Retired36.137.038.540.342.242.744.1
  Other2.22.42.42.32.32.42.2
 Want a job now2.42.42.22.12.02.11.9
  Reason for not looking: School attendance.0.0.0.0.0.0.0
  III health, disability0.70.70.70.60.60.60.5
  Home responsibilities0.20.20.10.10.10.10.1
  Think cannot get a job:0.90.70.60.70.70.80.7
  Job market factors0.40.30.30.30.30.50.4
  Personal factors0.50.40.30.40.30.40.4
  Other reasons0.70.80.70.60.60.60.5

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics: Household data from the Current Population Survey, 1977-1984.

From 1977 through 1982, money income of households headed by an elderly person increased faster than the rate of consumer price inflation. During that same period, the median income of these households rose 74 percent, from $6,300 in 1977 to $11,000 in 1982 (Table 6). This increase exceeded substantially the 49-percent increase in the median income of all households and a 59-percent growth in the annual average of the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers.
Table 6

Number and percent distribution of households with an aged head, by total money income: United States, 1977 and 1982

Total money income19771982


Number in thousandsPercentNumber in thousandsPercent
Total15,226100.017,672100.0
Under $5,0005,90938.82,95216.7
$5,000-9,9994,85731.95,15429.2
10,000-14,9992,05213.53,11717.6
15,000-17,4995983.91,1236.4
17,500-19,9994092.78975.1
20,000-24,9995573.71,4808.4
25,000-29,9993302.28614.9
30,000-49,9993772.51,4268.1
50,000 and over1370.96623.7
Median income$6,347$11,041
Mean income$9,309$15,869

SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of the Census (1978, February 1984)

Although employment status and money income influence the ability to finance consumption of health care, the presence of third-party reimbursement reduces the importance of the income-consumption link found in so many other markets. Because enrollees and providers both tend to treat health insurance as a permanent reducer of the cost of health care (rather than as a deferrment or shifting of that cost), more health care tends to be used at any given price or income level or health status than would otherwise be the case. The very high incidence of Medicare enrollment, the availability of Medicaid benefits, and the increasing purchase of individual “Medigap” private health insurance policies have effectively reduced the point-of-purchase price of health care over time, to the extent that it may even be treated by some as a “free” good, divorced from the premiums paid for coverage. In recent years, there has not been much change in the way aged Americans perceive their health status. The results of a survey of the noninstitutionalized population, in which respondents were asked to assess their own health, showed that in 1981 30 percent of those 65 and over believed themselves to be in “fair” or “poor” health compared with others in their age group, almost unchanged from responses in 1976 (Table 7). By excluding the institutionalized aged, most of whom would assess their health as fair or poor, the survey oversampled the healthy in the aged population, but the results are interesting none the less. In a study of responses for 1978, the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) observed that “self-assessed health status has been found to be highly associated with an individual's … utilization of health-care services. For instance, … persons assessed to be in excellent health spent 3.3 days in bed per person per year due to illness or injury and made 2.5 doctor visits per person per year, while the corresponding estimates for persons assessed to be in poor health were 64.2 bed days and 15.3 doctor visits per person per year” (National Center for Health Statistics, Mar. 1983). It should be noted that the direction of causality is both ways: increased doctor visits may induce a low assessment of health status, and a low assessment of health status may induce more doctor visits. Further, the incidence of fair or poor self-assessed health status increases with age, up to age 80, even though respondents were asked to rank themselves in relation to their age cohort (Figure 2 and Table 8). In the NCHS study of 1978 responses, the decline in the percent of people self-assessed in fair or poor health after age 80 was attributed largely to the relatively high rate of institutionalization or death for the group; those who remain uninstitutionalized were much more likely to be in the healthier part of the subgroup than was the case for younger subgroups.
Table 7

Percent of population, by self-assessment of health, limitation of activity, and age: United States, 1976 and 1981

AgeSelf-assessment of health as fair or poorWith limitation of activity

TotalLimited but not in major activityLimited in amount or kind of major activityUnable to carry on major activity





1976198119761981197619811976198119761981
Percent of population
Total112.111.813.913.73.53.37.06.83.43.6
Under 17 years4.34.03.73.81.81.81.71.80.20.2
 Under 6 years4.54.22.52.22.11.80.50.4
 6-16 years4.23.84.34.62.62.71.61.80.10.1
17-44 years8.38.38.98.43.43.04.44.21.11.2
45-64 years22.222.024.323.95.24.813.112.45.96.8
65 years or over31.330.145.445.76.06.621.821.717.617.5

Age adjusted by the direct method to the 1970 civilian noninstitutional population, using 4 age intervals.

SOURCE: National Center for Health Statistics: Health United States, 1983. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 84-1232. Public Health Service. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office, Dec. 1983.

Figure 2

Percent of persons assessed in fair or poor health by age: United States, 1978

Table 8

Number of persons and percent distribution, by respondent-assessed health status and age: United States, 1978

AgeAll personsRespondent-assessed health status

All health statusesExcellent or goodFair or poorExcellentGoodFairPoor

Number in thousandsPercent distribution 1Percent distribution 2
All ages213,828100.087.612.448.638.59.52.8
Under 5 years15,389100.095.34.760.733.74.20.5
5-9 years16,860100.095.54.560.034.84.00.5
10-14 years18,531100.095.94.160.235.13.70.4
15-19 years20,550100.094.45.756.737.25.00.6
20-24 years19,414100.092.87.252.939.66.40.8
25-29 years17,487100.092.37.753.538.56.71.0
30-34 years15,526100.091.58.553.337.96.81.7
35-39 years12,749100.089.510.550.838.38.42.0
40-44 years11,134100.087.512.547.140.19.82.7
45-49 years11,251100.084.115.942.141.612.23.7
50-54 years11,720100.080.020.038.241.514.45.5
55-59 years10,964100.075.724.332.942.516.87.4
60-64 years9,468100.072.427.630.741.319.67.8
65-69 years8,243100.070.229.828.541.221.68.1
70-74 years6,353100.070.329.728.441.221.28.2
75-79 years4,297100.068.331.725.941.923.08.4
80-84 years2,429100.068.032.026.741.022.09.8
85-89 years1,062100.070.329.732.537.918.311.5
90-94 years311100.076.423.635.439.216.436.8
95 years or over93100.067.7332.3329.038.7318.3314.0

Excludes persons with health status not assessed.

Includes persons with health status not assessed.

Relative standard error of 30 percent or more.

SOURCE: National Center for Health Statistics, Mar. 1983.

The aged tend to use more hospital care per capita than the general population does. A survey of non-Federal short-stay hospitals showed 10.7 million elderly patients discharged in 1982, 28 percent of all discharges (National Center for Health Statistics, Dec. 1983). Those estimates imply a discharge rate of 399 per 1,000 population for the aged, up 12.4 percent from a rate of 355 per 1,000 in 1977 (Table 9). By comparison, the discharge rate for the entire population (168 per 1,000 in 1982) was essentially unchanged over the period, and it actually declined somewhat if deliveries are excluded from the analysis.
Table 9

Discharges from non-Federal short-stay hospitals, by age: United States, 1977-1982

YearAll ages65 years of age or over

TotalExcluding deliveries



Number in thousandsPercent changePer 1,000 populationNumber in thousandsPercent changePer 1,000 populationNumber in thousandsPercent changePer 1,000 population
197735,90216732,5701528,344355
197835,616−0.816432,255−1.01498,7084.4362
197936,7473.216833,1012.61519,0864.3368
198037,8323.016834,0702.91519,8648.6384
198138,5441.916934,6311.615210,4085.5396
198238,5930.116834,648.015110,6972.8399

SOURCE: National Center for Health Statistics: Data from the National Health Survey, 1977-1982.

NOTE: Discharges per 1,000 population have been recalculated using total civilian population rather than civilian noninstitutional population.

The increase in the discharge rate for the aged population runs counter to other evidence of health status—the Constance over time of self-assessed health status and the slight decline in the percent of the noninstitutionalized population that withdrew from the labor force because of illness or disability. The apparent contradiction can be explained by two factors. First, the declining average length of stay for the aged has been accompanied by an increase in the incidence of multiple admissions during the year (Helbing, 1980, especially pp. 32-33), raising the discharge rate even though days of care per 1,000 population may change little. Second, the effect of increased health insurance coverage would be to increase consumption of health care for any given health status. A listing of discharges by first-listed diagnosis indicates that diseases of the circulatory system (specifically heart disease) were the most frequent reason for hospitalization for the aged, followed by diseases of the digestive system and malignant neoplasms; the most rapidly growing cause of hospitalization was endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases (including diabetes) (Table 10). Although the average length of a hospital stay has been falling, from 11.1 days for an aged patient in 1977 to 10.1 days in 1982, the aged tend to remain in a hospital longer than the general population does (National Center for Health Statistics, March 1979, Dec. 1983b). By first-listed diagnosis, the aged remain 2 to 3 days longer than average, not significantly different from the 1977 relationship.
Table 10

Number of inpatients discharged from short-stay hospitals, by category of first-listed diagnosis and age: United States, 1977 and 1982

Category of first-listed diagnosis19771982Percent change



All agesAges 65 +All agesAges 65 +All agesAges 65 +
Discharges in thousands
All conditions35,9028,34338,59410,6987.528.2
Infective and parasitic diseases837111695135−17.021.6
Neoplasms2,5499102,5941,1171.822.7
Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases9412711,16142623.457.2
Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs29810136715123.249.5
Mental disorders1,6251931,7462697.439.4
Diseases of the nervous system and sense organs1,5564761,82873917.555.3
Diseases of the circulatory system4,7582,4715,4883,12815.326.6
Diseases of the respiratory system3,4547843,4591,0030.127.9
Diseases of the digestive system4,2981,0734,6281,3547.726.2
Diseases of the genitourinary system3,5656273,411748−4.319.3
Complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperius9191,01810.8
Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue575106566135−1.627.4
Diseases of the musculoskeletal system1,8953792,37757825.452.5
Congenital abnomalities33319335250.631.6
Certain causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality20166730.0
Symptoms and ill-defined conditions6999262488−10.7−4.3
Accidents, poisonings, and violence3,7527013,568747−4.96.6
Special conditions and examinations without sickness, or tests with negative findings3,828294,5635519.289.7
Discharges per 1,000 population
All conditions1673551683990.312.4
Infective and parasitic diseases4535−22.56.6
Neoplasms12391142−5.07.6
Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases41251615.137.8
Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs142614.931.0
Mental disorders888100.322.2
Diseases of the nervous system and sense organs7208289.636.1
Diseases of the circulatory system22105241177.611.0
Diseases of the respiratory system16331537−6.512.1
Diseases of the digestive system204620500.510.6
Diseases of the genitourinary system17271528−10.74.6
Complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperius 140403.4
Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue3525−8.111.6
Diseases of the musculoskeletal system916102217.133.7
Congenital abnormalities2111−6.115.3
Certain causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality0010674.6
Symptoms and ill-defined conditions3433−16.7−16.2
Accidents, poisonings, and violence17301628−11.3−6.6
Special conditions and examinations without sickness, or tests with negative findings18120211.266.2
All conditions except childbirth152355151399−0.712.4
Total civilian population214,74623,513230,11726,8267.214.1

SOURCE: National Center for Health Statistics: Data from the National Health Survey.

Females with deliveries have been moved from this category to “special conditions” for 1977, in order to make the data consistent with those for 1982.

Types of services consumed

The estimates of personal health care expenditures presented in this section are tied to several sources. Estimates of spending for the aged in 1977 are based on the work of Fisher (1980), updated to reflect more recent Medicare and Medicaid data and revised aggregate spending estimates. Projections for 1984 are tied, in addition to Fisher's work, to projections of Medicare and Medicaid spending prepared in HCFA's Office of Financial and Actuarial Analysis and to Freeland and Schendler's (1984) projections of national health expenditures. Spending on behalf of the aged for personal health care—the direct provision of goods and services—has nearly tripled over the last 7 years, rising from a level of $43 billion in 1977 to a projected $120 billion in 1984 (Table 11). From 2.3 percent in 1977, the portion of the gross national product used to provide personal health care for the aged is projected to reach 3.3 percent in 1984. Part of the 15.6-percent annual growth in spending is due to an increase in the sheer number of aged people, whose count increased at a rate of 2.3 percent annually from 1977 to 1984. However, spending per capita rose from $1,785 to a projected $4,202 (Table 12), still averaging a 13-percent annual growth.
Table 11

Personal health care expenditures in millions for people 65 years of age or over, by source of funds and type of service: United States, 1984 and 1977

Year and source of fundsType of service

Total careHospitalPhysicianNursing homeOther care
1984
Total$119,872$54,200$24,770$25,105$15,798
Private39,3416,1609,82713,03810,316
 Consumer38,8755,9649,81812,85610,237
  Out-of-pocket30,1981,6946,46812,5699,467
  Insurance8,6774,2703,350287770
 Other private466196918279
Government80,53148,04014,94312,0675,482
 Medicare58,51940,52414,3145393,142
 Medicaid15,2882,59546710,4181,808
 Other government6,7244,9201621,110532
Exhibit: Population (in millions)28.5
1977
Total43,42518,9067,78210,6966,041
Private15,6692,3193,3235,4244,603
 Consumer15,4992,2633,3205,3524,564
  Out-of-pocket12,7069272,1475,2644,368
  Insurance2,7931,3361,17388195
 Other private1705637239
Government27,75616,5874,4585,2721,438
 Medicare19,17114,0874,158348578
 Medicaid6,0497332324,453631
 Other government2,5361,76768470230
Exhibit: Population (in millions)24.3

SOURCE: Office of Financial and Actuarial Analysis, Health Care Financing Administration

Table 12

Personal health care expenditures per capita for people 65 years of age or over, by source of funds and type of service: United States, 1984 and 1977

Year and source of fundsType of service

Total careHospitalPhysicianNursing homeOther care
1984
Total$4,202$1,900$868$880$554
Private1,379216344457362
 Consumer1,363209344451359
  Out-of-pocket1,05959227441332
  Insurance3041501171027
 Other private167163
Government2,8231,684524423192
 Medicare2,0511,42050219110
 Medicaid536911636563
 Other government23617263919
1977
Total1,785777320440248
Private64495137223189
 Consumer63793136220188
  Out-of-pocket5223888216180
  Insurance115554848
 Other private72132
Government1,14168218321759
 Medicare7885791711424
 Medicaid249301018326
 Other government104733199

Less than $.50.

SOURCE: Office of Financial and Actuarial Analysis, Health Care Financing Administration

Two-thirds of the expenditures in 1984 for personal health care on behalf of the elderly is projected to come from public programs, mostly from Medicare (Table 13). The hospital insurance and supplementary medical insurance trust funds combined to account for nearly half of the aged health bill (including items, such as prescription drugs, not covered by Medicare). Federal and State Medicaid payments will absorb another 13 percent of the total (principally nursing home care), and other Government programs, mainly the Veterans Administration, will pay 5 percent of the bill.
Table 13

Percent distribution of personal health care expenditures per capita for people 65 years of age or over, by source of funds and type of service: United States, 1984 and 1977

Year and source of fundsType of service

Total careHospitalPhysicianNursing homeOther care
1984
Total per capita100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
Private32.811.439.751.965.3
 Consumer32.411.039.651.264.8
  Out-of-pocket25.23.126.150.159.9
  Insurance7.27.913.51.14.9
 Other private0.40.4.00.70.5
Government67.288.660.348.134.7
 Medicare48.874.857.82.119.9
 Medicaid12.84.81.941.511.4
 Other government5.69.10.74.43.4
1977
Total per capita100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
Private36.112.342.750.776.2
 Consumer35.712.042.750.075.5
  Out-of-pocket29.34.927.649.272.3
  Insurance6.47.115.10.83.2
 Other private0.40.3.00.70.6
Government63.987.757.349.323.8
 Medicare44.174.553.43.39.6
 Medicaid13.93.93.041.610.4
 Other government5.89.30.94.43.8

SOURCE: Office of Financial and Actuarial Analysis, Health Care Financing Administration

The remaining third of personal health care expenditures for the aged will be paid mostly by consumers of care. About a quarter of the aged health bill in 1984—consisting of coinsurance, deductibles, and noncovered services and goods—is projected to be paid with “out-of-pocket” funds. In addition, private health insurance, including Medigap policies, is projected to cover 7 percent of total spending. Two-thirds of the money spend on health care for the aged goes for institutional care (Table 14). In 1984, hospital care is projected to account for 45 percent of the total, and nursing home care to absorb another 21 percent. Expenditures for physicians' services will account for 21 percent of the total; of the remaining 13 percent, about half will be for services of dentists and other health practitioners and half for consumer durable and nondurable goods.
Table 14

Percent distribution of personal health care expenditures per capita for people 65 years of age or over by type of service, according to source of funds: United States, 1984 and 1977

Year and source of fundsTotal per capitaType of service

TotalHospitalPhysicianNursing homeOther Care
1984
Total per capita$4,202100.045.220.720.913.2
Private1,379100.015.725.033.126.2
 Consumer1,363100.015.325.333.126.3
  Out-of-pocket1,059100.05.621.441.631.3
  Insurance304100.049.238.63.38.9
 Other private16100.042.11.939.117.0
Government2,823100.059.718.615.06.8
 Medicare2,051100.069.224.50.95.4
 Medicaid536100.017.03.168.111.8
 Other government236100.073.22.416.57.9
1977
Total per capita1,785100.043.517.924.613.9
Private644100.014.821.234.629.4
 Consumer637100.014.621.434.529.4
  Out-of-pocket522100.07.316.941.434.4
  Insurance115100.047.942.03.17.0
 Other private7100.032.71.942.522.9
Government1,141100.059.816.119.05.2
 Medicare788100.073.521.71.83.0
 Medicaid249100.012.13.873.610.4
 Other government104100.069.72.718.69.1

SOURCE: Office of Financial and Actuarial Analysis, Health Care Financing Administration

One of the reasons why the aged account for a disproportionate share of spending for health care is that the last year of a person's life tends to be very health care intensive, a factor that weighs more heavily upon the aged population than upon younger cohorts. A recent study of the Medicare population, comparing reimbursement and use of services by enrollees who died in 1978 with those of enrollees who survived the year, illustrates this point (Lubitz and Prihoda, 1984). The study reported that reimbursements per user were four times as great for enrollees who died during the year as for those who did not die (Figure 3). Decedents comprised 6 percent of the group studied and accounted for 28 percent of Medicare reimbursement. Hospital discharges per 1,000 enrollees were five times as great for decedents as for survivors, and days of care per 1,000 enrollees were seven times as high (Table 15). Assuming that the direction, if not the magnitude, of this relation translates to the general population, it is easy to see how the aged, with relatively high death rates, could spend more per capita for health care on this basis alone.
Figure 3

Medicare utilization by the aged: decedents last year of life vs. survivors in 1978

Table 15

Selected measures of short-stay hospital use by Medicare decedents in their last year, and survivors, by age: All areas, 1978

Measure and ageSurvival status

DecedentsSurvivors
Persons hospitalizedPer 1,000 enrollees
 67 years or over739202
 67-74 years769179
 75 years or over727226
DischargesPer person hospitalized
 67 years or over2.11.5
 67-74 years2.31.4
 75 years or over2.01.5
DischargesPer 1,000 enrollees
 67 years or over1,537294
 67-74 years1,771260
 75 years or over1,444330
Days of care
 67 years or over20,6073,033
 67-74 years23,7952,530
 75 years or over19,3423,566
Average length of stayIn days
 67 years or over13.410.3
 67-74 years13.49.7
 75 years or over13.410.8

NOTE: Based on a 5-percent sample of enrollees.

SOURCE: Lubitz J. and Prihoda R.: The use and costs of Medicare services in the last 2 years of life. Health Care Financing Review. HCFA Pub. No. 03169. Health Care Financing Administration. Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, Mar. 1984.

The major components of spending for health on behalf of the elderly, as noted earlier, are hospital and nursing home care and physicians' services.

Hospital care

Hospital care for the aged is projected to cost $54 billion in 1984, up an average of 16.2 percent per year since 1977; this is an amount equal to $1,900 per capita. Medicare reimbursement will account for three-quarters of that amount, and Medicaid, the Veterans' Administration, and other Government programs each will pay about 5 percent of the bill. Private health insurance benefits will cover 8 percent of total spending for hospital care, and philanthropic sources will fund another half percent. The remaining 3 percent (for coinsurance, deductibles, and noncovered services) will be paid “out of pocket.” (Further discussion of this type of expenditure can be found later in this article.) In addition to the hospital discharge data discussed earlier and the Medicare data to be discussed later, there is additional evidence that hospital use among the elderly is increasing. In a survey of community hospitals, the American Hospital Association found that admissions among the elderly reached a level of 11.8 million in 1983, an average increase of 4.8 percent per year since 1977 (Hospital Data Center, 1983). Patient days for the aged rose 3.0 percent annually, to a 1983 level of 114 million, and the length of stay fell, from 10.7 days in 1977 to 9.7 in 1983. (During the same period, admissions for the rest of the population fell 0.4 percent per year, and inpatient days fell 1.1 percent per year.)

Nursing home care

Nursing home care includes services provided in all facilities or parts of facilities that are Medicare- or Medicaid-certified skilled nursing homes, Medicaid-certified intermediate care homes, or any other home providing some level of nursing care, whether certified by either program or not. Facilities that provide only domiciliary care are excluded. Based on 1984 estimates, spending for nursing home care for the aged is projected to have grown an average of 13 percent per year since 1977; 1984 estimates imply an expenditure of $880 per person. There has not been much change in the way in which this care has been financed; about half of the money comes from patients and their families and most of the rest comes from Government programs. Medicaid paid 42 percent of the bill, and Medicare (which provides limited coverage of nursing home care) paid 2 percent. Private health insurance coverage of nursing home care is minimal, leaving a large out-of-pocket liability for consumers of care. The growth of expenditure for nursing home services is attributable to price inflation, to increased numbers of aged people, and to changes in the number and types of days of care per capita for the aged. The most recent national data for nursing home residents showed a wide variety in the monthly charges for nursing home care (National Center for Health Statistics, July 1979). Charges varied by age of resident, ranging from $656 per month in 1977 for residents 65-69 years of age to $755 per month for those 95 years of age or over. Monthly charges also varied by length of stay, with lower monthly charges being associated with longer lengths of stay (and, presumably, more chronic conditions as opposed to acute conditions). Although charge data do not exist for more recent periods, prices paid by nursing homes for goods and services used to provide care increased 8.4 percent per year on average between 1977 and 1983. The number of aged people in nursing homes has increased, in absolute terms and as a fraction of the aged population. According to the 1970 Decennial Census of Population, 0.8 million people 65 years of age or over were in homes for the aged and dependent; 1.2 million such people were enumerated in the 1980 census, an annual increase of 4.5 percent. The group increased in size from 4.0 percent of the 1970 population to 4.8 percent of the 1980 population. The proportion of the population in nursing homes in 1977 varied with age, from 1 percent of those 65-69 years of age to 22.6 percent of those 85 years or over (National Center for Health Statistics, July 1979, U.S. Bureau of the Census 1982). The percent of residents that required assistance in one or more daily activities (bathing, dressing, etc.) rose from 86 percent of residents 65-74 years of age to 96 percent of those 85 years of age or over. Length of stay initially falls and then rises with age among the aged population. The median length of stay for people 65-69 years of age discharged in 1976 was 62 days; that median dropped to 47 days for people 70-74 years of age and then rose to 379 days for people 95 years or over (National Center for Health Statistics, July 1979). Further, more of the “elderly aged” end their lives in nursing homes: 1976 discharge data from the same survey show that of those 65-69 years of age at discharge, 82 percent were discharged alive, a rate that diminished steadily to the point that only 48 percent of those 95 years or over were alive when discharged.

Physician services

Spending on behalf of the aged for physicians' services grew an average of 18 percent per year from 1977 to 1984, reaching a projected level of $24.8 billion for 1984. Per capita annual growth of 15.3 percent exceeded the 9-percent growth of the consumer price index for physician services, suggesting a substantial increase in use per capita of physician services by the aged. The Medicare program will pay 58 percent of the $870 projected to be spent per capita by the aged in 1984. Another quarter of the total is estimated to be direct patient payments—liability for coinsurance, deductibles, and services not covered by third parties. Private health insurance benefits will pay 14 percent of the total, bringing the consumer share of the total to 40 percent, and Medicaid and other Government programs will pay 3 percent of the bill. Existing data support the increased consumption of physician care by the elderly. There was little change in the pattern of per capita visits for physician services among the aged noninstitutionalized population from 1977 to 1981: the number of visits increased 2.1 percent per year, less than the 2.8-percent growth of the noninstitutional population; and the number of visits per person and the average time between visits remained almost unchanged over the 4-year period (National Center for Health Statistics, 1978, October 1982). However, a relatively large portion of physician services for the elderly occurs in a hospital, and patient days, as has been noted already, grew 3.0 percent per year during the period 1977-83, faster than the increase in the total aged civilian population (including the institutionalized); physician visits to hospital inpatients are not included in the visits data above. In addition, the number of surgeries and other procedures performed on aged patients has increased dramatically, in numbers, per hospital discharge, and per 1,000 population (National Center for Health Statistics, March 1979, Dec. 1983b). These trends explain much of the growth in physician expenditure per capita among the aged.

Other health care

Spending for health care other than hospital and nursing home care and physicians' services rose 14.7 percent per year from 1977 to 1984, reaching a projected $554 per person in 1984. About two-thirds of this amount will be paid by private sources, and Medicare and Medicaid will pay most of the rest. The extent of third-party coverage in this category of consumption varies by type of care. The category includes the services of dentists and other health professionals (including home health care), consumer medical durables and nondurables, and care not identified by type or not classified elsewhere. In general, these goods and services tend to be purchased more with out-of-pocket funds than the other classes mentioned above are: although accounting for 13 percent of total spending, they accounted for 31 percent of out-of-pocket spending (Table 14). Use of goods and services in this group by the aged varies by service. Table 16 shows data collected during the 1977 National Medical Care Expenditure Survey for four such types: prescription drugs, vision aids, medical equipment and supplies, and dentists visits. Except for dentists' services, the data indicate that a greater proportion of the aged than of the general population consume these types of care and that they consume more of these types of care per user than the general population does.
Table 16

Use of other health services and goods, by age: United States, 1977

Other health services and goodsTotal population65 years or over
Dental visits
 People with at least one visit41.129.9
 Visits per person1.31.0
 Visits per user13.23.3
Prescribed medicine
 People with at least one prescription58.275.2
 Prescribed medicines per person4.310.7
 Prescribed medicines per user17.514.2
Vision aids
 People with purchase or repair of glasses or contact lenses12.416.6
 Purchases or repairs of glasses or contact lenses per thousand population143193
Medical equipment and supplies
 People with at least one purchase or rental6.213.3
 Purchases or rentals per thousand population93245
 Purchases or rentals per user11.51.8

A user is a person with at least one of the items in question (a visit, a prescription, etc).

SOURCES: Hagan, M.: Medical equipment and supplies: purchases and rentals, expenditures, and sources of payment. National Health Care Expenditure Study Data Preview No. 10. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 82-3321. Public Health Service. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office, Oct. 1982.

Kasper, J.: Prescribed medicines: use, expenditures, and sources of payment. National Health Care Expenditures Study Data Preview No. 9. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 82-3320. Public Health Service. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office, Oct. 1982.

Rossiter, L: Dental services: use, expenditures, and sources of payment. National Health Care Expenditure Study Data Preview No. 8. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 82-3319. Public Health Service. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office, Oct. 1982.

Walden, D.: Eyeglasses and contact lenses: purchases, expenditures, and sources of payment. National Health Care Expenditure Study Data Preview No. 11. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 82-3322. Public Health Service. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office, Oct. 1982.

Home health care is a benefit covered by Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers as a lower cost alternative to institutional care. Medicare home health benefits, previously limited to 100 visits per benefit period under hospital insurance and 100 visits per calendar year under supplementary medical insurance, were liberalized over time to provide coverage of an unlimited number of home health visits. Home health care is a growing segment of the health care delivery system. In 1980, 21 million home health visits were made to the aged under Medicare alone, up 12.9 percent per year from 1977, serving 888 thousand aged beneficiaries (Table 17). Use of home health services varies by age: 14 out of every 1,000 Medicare enrollees 65-66 years of age received Medicare-reimbursed home health services in 1980, compared with 74 out of every 1,000 85 years and over. Similar variation existed in the number of visits per 1,000 enrollees. Use among the very elderly increased faster between 1977 and 1980 than among the recently aged.
Table 17

Medicare home health services for the aged: Persons served, visits, and charges by age: 1977 and 1980

Year and ageNumber of enrollees1UsersVisitsCharges



NumberPer 1,000 enrolleesNumberPer userPer 1,000 enrolleesTotal 2AmountVisit charges Per visitPer user
1980
All ages25,515888.234.820,62123.2808$707,125$674,840$33$760
65-663,57248.313.51,08422.430338,41636,53334756
67-683,33559.117.71,32422.439746,86844,62234755
69-703,05066.121.71,51522.949752,69450,26333761
71-722,79872.625.91,66522.959557,82655,18533760
73-742,45977.331.41,78923.172762,06159,24433766
75-794,809203.142.24,75823.4989163,443156,32833770
80-843,081183.559.64,26123.21,383144,418138,22232753
85 or over2,410178.173.94,22623.71,753141,399134,44232755
1977
All ages23,838642.927.014,33222.3601375,769355,17825552
65-663,34936.911.078221.223421,01219,81025537
67-683,15044.214.097622.131026,33024,79625561
69-702,93249.616.91,07921.836828,77127,79626560
71-722,58554.020.91,20222.346531,99330,29525561
73-742,31057.224.81,26722.254833,66131,94325558
75-794,463146.132.73,28422.573686,20881,73625559
80-842,963134.445.43,00422.41,01477,55973,48224547
85 or over2,086117.156.12,68122.91,28568,63064,32524549

Counts of aged persons enrolled in the hospital insurance and/or supplementary medical insurance programs as of July 1.

Includes charges for durable medical equipment and supplies in addition to visit charges.

NOTE: Based on a 40-percent sample of enrollees.

SOURCES: Callahan (1981) and unpublished data.

The use of home health services by Medicare enrollees is concentrated among a fairly small group of users. Although visits per user averaged 23 in 1980, the median was 12.5—that is, half the people who used home health services in 1980 received 12 visits or fewer. That the mean of the distribution is so much greater than the median indicates that the bulk of visits is received by users at the high end of the range.

Funding personal health care

Like the general population, the aged in the United States have extensive third-party coverage of their health care costs. About three-quarters of the total to be spent on their behalf in 1984 is projected to come from Government programs or private health insurance, a higher proportion than for the general population and slightly higher than the same share in 1977 (Table 13). The largest single source of funds is Medicare, which will pay an estimated $59 billion in 1984 for health care for the aged; private health insurance, on the other hand, while growing rapidly as a source of funds for the elderly, will not be nearly as large a source for the aged as it will be for the general population. In general, the aged receive far more services from Government programs than younger cohorts do. In addition to personal health care expenditures, the aged or their agents must pay health insurance premiums in order to obtain coverage. Part of these payments are not included in the estimates presented in this article, as will be explained later.

Medicare

The Medicare program was enacted into law on July 30, 1965, as Title XVIII of the Social Security Act—Health Insurance for the Aged. Benefits under its two parts—hospital insurance (HI) and supplementary medical insurance (SMI)—began July 1, 1966. From 1977 to 1984, Medicare's share of health care spending for the elderly increased from 44 percent to 49 percent of the total. In 1984, Medicare is projected to finance $59 billion of the estimated $120 billion spent on behalf of the elderly, making it the largest public source of funding for personal health care expenditures for the aged. Hospital insurance covers inpatient care in a hospital or skilled nursing facility and home health visits. Supplementary medical insurance covers a variety of medical services and supplies furnished by physicians or others in connection with physicians' services, outpatient hospital services, and home health services. There are limits on services covered (Health Care Financing Administration, 1983) and cost-sharing features associated with each of these programs.

Enrollment

The number of aged people covered by the Medicare program increased from 23.8 million in 1977 to 27.1 million in 1983, an average annual increase of 2.2 percent (Table 18). The aged population has grown over twice as fast as the total population during this 6-year period due to a number of factors, including improved health status and declining birth rates. Most of the elderly are covered by the Medicare program; the current slight decline in the proportion covered is expected to be reversed as employees of nonprofit organizations and of the Federal Government “age” into the program.
Table 18

Number of aged Medicare enrollees, percent of total population, percent of population 65 years of age or over, and type of coverage: All areas, 1977-1983

YearHospital insurance and/or supplementary medical insurance in millionsPercent of total population1Percent of population 65 years or over1Type of coverage

Hospital insurance and supplementary medical insurance in millionsHospital insurance only in millionsSupplementary medical insurance only in millions
197723.810.497.222.60.80.4
197824.410.596.923.10.80.4
197924.910.796.823.70.80.4
198025.510.896.824.30.80.4
198126.010.996.624.80.80.4
198226.511.096.525.30.80.4
198327.111.196.525.90.80.4
Average annual percent change2.21.1−0.12.2−0.63.2

Social Security Administration, Social Security Area Population Estimates. Population data for 1983 are projections.

SOURCE: Office of Financial and Actuarial Analysis, Bureau of Data Management and Strategy, Health Care Financing Administration.

Coverage under this program was extended to Federal employees under the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982; Social Security coverage was mandated for employees of nonprofit organizations under the Social Security Amendments of 1983. (See the 1983 annual HI report (Board of Trustees, 1983) for further details). The age and sex composition of the aged HI population has changed over time. The median age of the group increased from 73.0 years of age in 1977 to 73.2 years of age in 1983. Also, the number of enrollees 85 years of age or over grew from 9 percent of the aged population in 1977 to over 10 percent in 1983 (Table 19). The HI aged population currently has a slightly higher proportion of women than in 1977. In 1983, there were 3 females for every 2 males 65 years of age or over (Table 20). In the age group 85 years or over, the ratio of females to males was 5 to 2.
Table 19

Aged Medicare hospital insurance enrollees: Number and percent distribution by age, median age, and rate of persons 85 years or over per 100 persons 65-69 years: All areas, July 1, 1966-1983

YearNumber in thousandsPercent distribution by ageMedian age (years)Number of persons 85 + per 100 persons age 65-69

Total65-6970-7475-7980-8485 +
196619,082100.034.128.719.811.26.272.618
197020,361100.033.327.220.312.07.273.022
197522,472100.033.526.319.312.58.473.025
197723,475100.033.426.219.012.68.973.027
198025,104100.033.126.318.812.29.673.029
198125,591100.032.926.318.912.19.873.130
198226,115100.032.626.318.912.210.073.231
198326,670100.032.426.219.012.210.173.231

NOTE: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.

SOURCE: Bureau of Data Management and Strategy, Health Care Financing Administration and unpublished data.

Table 20

Aged Medicare hospital insurance enrollees: Percent distribution by sex and race, and rate of males per 100 females: All areas, 1966-1983

YearTotal personsMaleFemaleNumber of males per 100 females


TotalWhiteAll other racesUnknownTotalWhiteAll other racesUnknown
1966100.042.638.63.40.657.450.84.12.574
1970100.041.837.43.50.958.251.94.41.972
1975100.040.836.23.61.059.252.84.71.769
1977100.040.636.03.71.059.452.94.81.768
1980100.040.435.73.71.159.552.94.91.768
1981100.040.435.63.71.159.652.95.01.768
1982100.040.435.63.71.159.652.95.01.768
1983100.040.335.53.71.159.752.95.01.868

NOTE: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.

SOURCE: Bureau of Data Management and Strategy, Health Care Financing Administration and unpublished data.

Users

In 1982, over 17 million aged enrollees, 641 out of every 1,000 enrolled, were “users,” that is, they received Medicare-reimbursed services after satisfying the program deductible. The number of aged users increased 5.8 percent per year from 1977 through 1981, rising to 65.5 percent of aged enrollees before dropping in 1982. By the end of 1984, it is expected that 66 out of every 100 enrollees will have received reimbursed services during the year (Tables 21 and 22).
Table 21

Number of aged Medicare enrollees served under hospital insurance and/or supplementary medical insurance, rate per 1,000 enrolled, amount reimbursed per person served, and percent change by age: All areas, 1977, 1981, and 1982

AgePersons servedPerson served per 1,000 enrolledReimbursement per person served



Number in thousandsAnnual percent changeRateAnnual percent changeAverageAnnual percent change






1977198119821977-811981-821977198119821977-811981-821977198119821977-811981-82
Total 65 years and over13,58417,03617,0235.8−0.1569.8655.0641.43.5−2.1$1,332$2,024$2,43911.020.5
65-747,7149,5199,4065.4−1.2538.4615.8600.13.4−2.61,1931,8002,17210.820.7
75-844,5095,6445,6985.81.0607.2701.7690.83.7−1.61,4782,2432,70511.020.6
85 or over1,3611,8731,9198.32.4652.5746.3733.03.4−1.81,6362,5072,96011.318.1

Date include experience for persons who exceeded the annual Medicare deductibles and for whom reimbursements were made. The SMI annual deductible increased from $60 to $75 effective January 1, 1982. For that reason, comparisons of data for periods after 1981 with data for 1981 and earlier may be misleading.

NOTE: Based on a 5-percent sample of enrollees.

SOURCE: Bureau of Data Management and Strategy, Health Care Financing Administration and unpublished data.

Table 22

Number of aged Medicare enrollees served per 1,000 enrolled, by type of coverage: United States, 1977-1984

Type of coverageCalendar yearAverage annual percent change


197719781979198019811982198321984 21977-811982-84
Hospital insurance and/or supplementary medical insurance5705946106386556416556603.51.5
Hospital insurance2312322322402432512552601.31.8
Supplementary medical insurance5816076246526696546606703.61.2

Data include experience for persons who exceeded the annual Medicare deductibles and for whom reimbursements were made. The SMI annual deductible increased from $60 to $75 on January 1, 1982. For that reason, comparisons of data for periods after 1981 with data for 1981 and earlier may be misleading.

Estimated.

NOTE: Based on a 5-percent sample of enrollees.

SOURCE: Bureau of Data Management and Strategy, Health Care Financing Administration.

In 1982, the SMI deductible was raised from $60 to $75. Persons incurring allowed charges under SMI in excess of $60 but less than $76 were not included in the 1982 estimate of persons served. However, persons incurring these charges were included in the 1981 estimates and earlier. The effect of the increase in the SMI deductible would be even greater if one were to adjust for the effects of inflation upon medical costs. User rates vary with age (Table 21). In 1982, 733 enrollees per 1,000 aged 85 years or over received reimbursed services, compared to 600 per 1,000 aged 65-74 years. However, use rates have grown at about the same rate for each of the age cohorts—about 3 ½ percent per year between 1977 and 1981. Reimbursement per user is not uniform for Medicare enrollees in age groups 65-74, 75-84, and 85 years or over. For example, there is a 36-percent difference between the reimbursement of $2,200 per user 65-74 years of age and that of $3,000 per user 85 years and over (Table 21). Although reimbursement was made for services provided to three-fifths of the enrolled population, about 2 percent of enrollees accounted for a third of the reimbursements and 8 percent accounted for two-thirds (Table 23).
Table 23

Number of aged Medicare enrollees with and without reimbursement under hospital insurance and/or supplementry medical insurance, by reimbursement interval: United States, 1977, 1981, and 1982

EnrolleesReimbursement


ItemNumber in millionsPercent distributionCumulative percentAmount in millionsPercent distributionCumulative percent
1982
All aged persons enrolled28.0100.0$41,526100.0
Persons with no reimbursement11.039.2100.0
Persons with reimbursement117.060.841,526100.0
Reimbursement interval:
 Less than $1004.114.760.81880.5100.0
 $100-4995.118.246.21,2253.099.5
 500-1,4992.48.427.92,1195.196.6
 1,500-2,9991.76.219.53,7889.191.5
 3,000-4,9991.34.513.34,95411.982.4
 5,000-9,9991.44.98.89,70723.470.4
 10,000-14,9990.51.93.96,52715.747.1
 15,000 or more0.51.91.913,01731.331.3
1981
All aged persons enrolled27.5100.034,490100.0
Persons with no reimbursement10.438.0100.0
Persons with reimbursement117.062.034,490100.0
Reimbursement interval:
 Less than $1004.717.162.02140.6100.0
 $100-4995.218.844.91,2123.599.4
 500-1,4992.38.226.12,0425.995.9
 1,500-2,9991.76.217.93,69910.789.9
 3,000-4,9991.24.311.74,56913.279.2
 5,000-9,9991.24.57.58,63525.066.0
 10,000-14,9990.41.63.05,34015.540.9
 15,000 or more0.41.41.48,77925.525.5
1977
All aged persons enrolled25.2100.018,098100.0
Persons with no reimbursement11.646.1100.0
Persons with reimbursement113.653.918,098100.0
Reimbursement interval:
 Less than $1004.718.553.92031.1100.0
 $100-4993.714.535.38314.698.9
 500-1,4992.07.820.81,85410.294.3
 1,500-2,9991.45.713.03,08517.084.0
 3,000-4,9990.93.47.33,36218.667.0
 5,000 or more1.03.83.88,76448.448.4

Data include experience for persons who exceeded the annual Medicare deductibles and for whom reimbursements were made. The SMI annual deductible increased from $60 to $75 effective January 1, 1982. For that reason, comparisons of data for periods after 1981 with data for 1981 and earlier may be misleading.

NOTE: Based on a 5-percent sample of enrollees.

SOURCE: Bureau of Data Management and Strategy, Health Care Financing Administration and unpublished data.

Funding

Two separate trust funds were established under the Social Security Act to pay benefits and administrative expenses for the Medicare program. Two-thirds of Medicare benefit expenditures are paid from the hospital insurance (HI) trust fund, primarily for inpatient hospital care. The other third is paid from the supplementary medical insurance (SMI) trust fund for physician and related care (Table 24).
Table 24

Medicare hospital insurance and supplementary medical insurance disbursements, by type: All areas, fiscal years 1977-1983

Fiscal yearsHospital and supplementary medical insuranceHospital insuranceSupplementary medical insurance



Benefit paymentsAdministrative expensesTotalBenefit paymentsAdministrative expenses1TotalBenefit paymentsAdministrative expensesTotal

Amount in millions
1977$20,773$ 776$21,549$14,906$301$15,207$ 5,867$475$ 6,342
197824,26395525,21817,41145117,8626,8525047,356
197928,1501,00729,15719,89145220,3438,2595558,814
198033,9341,09035,02523,79049724,28810,14459310,737
198141,2521,23642,48828,90735329,26012,34588313,228
198249,1491,27550,42434,34352134,86414,80675415,560
198355,5891,34656,93538,10252238,62417,48782418,311

Includes costs of experiments, demonstration projects, and Peer Review Organizations.

NOTE: Totals do not necessarily equal the sum of rounded components.

SOURCE: Office of Financial and Actuarial Analysis, Bureau of Data Management and Strategy, Health Care Financing Administration.

The HI trust fund is financed primarily through a tax on a portion of current earnings in employment covered under Social Security, with a small amount of voluntary premiums and interest income. In 1983, the maximum amount of annual earnings to which the tax applied was $35,700, and the contribution rate was 1.30 percent of taxable earnings. The same rate applied to employers, employees, and self-employed people. Approximately 90 percent of HI income is from payroll taxes. Employers pay a slightly larger share of payroll taxes than employees do because of the limit on taxes an individual worker must pay. The employers' share of taxes was 49 percent, the employees' share was 48 percent, and that of the self-employed was 3 percent in 1983 (Table 25). In 1983, the working population, employees and self-employed, contributed $18 billion to the HI trust fund through payroll taxes.
Table 25

Medicare: Hospital Insurance Trust Fund income and percent distribution of payroll taxes by type: Fiscal years 1977-1983

Fiscal yearTotal incomePayroll taxesVoluntary premiumsOther income

TotalEmployerEmployeeSelf-employed
Amount in millions
1977$15,374$13,649$ 6,714$ 6,477$ 457$11$1,714
197818,54316,6778,2357,949494121,854
197921,91019,9279,8159,482630171,967
198025,41523,24411,42011,084739172,154
198132,86330,42515,02314,603799212,417
198237,61134,39016,87216,4051,113253,195
198343,94036,38718,29517,158934267,528
Percent distribution of payroll taxes
1977100.049.247.53.3
1978100.049.447.73.0
1979100.049.347.63.2
1980100.049.147.73.2
1981100.049.448.02.6
1982100.049.147.73.2
1983100.050.347.22.6

1984 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund and unpublished data.

NOTE: Totals do not necessarily equal the sum of rounded components.

SOURCE: Office of Financial and Actuarial Analysis, Bureau of Data Management and Strategy, Health Care Financing Administration.

Aged people who are not eligible for Medicare hospital insurance coverage through Social Security are permitted to enroll in HI voluntarily by paying a monthly premium. The HI premium was $45 per month in the first half of 1977 and $54 per month in the second half of the year. During 1983, the monthly premium was $113, and it is set at $155 currently in 1984. Only a small percent of HI enrollees purchase HI coverage each year. In 1977, 22,000 aged people paid the HI premium for 1 month or more, and in 1981, 25,000 paid the premium. Trust fund income from voluntary premiums paid by aged HI enrollees increased from $11 million in fiscal year 1977 to $26 million in fiscal year 1983. (Estimates of consumer payments for personal health care for the aged in this report do not include these nor SMI premiums.) The SMI trust fund is financed from two sources—monthly premiums paid by or on behalf of enrollees and Federal general tax revenue. Over time, the proportion of trust fund income accounted for by individual premiums has fallen, leaving taxpayers to foot an increasing share of SMI expenditures. Originally, the monthly SMI premium was designed to cover one-half of program costs, so that enrollees and Government would share the bill equally. By law, however, the premium could be raised by no more than the percentage increase in social security benefits, while SMI costs increased at a much faster rate. Consequently, increased infusions of general revenues were needed to pay program obligations. In 1983, Federal revenue contributions for the aged amounted to $12 billion, three times as much as the $4 billion paid in monthly premiums (Table 26).
Table 26

Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund income: Fiscal years 1977-83

Fiscal yearTotal incomePremiumsGovernment contributionsOther IncomeRatio of Government contribution to premiums



TotalAgedDisabledTotal1AgedDisabledTotalAgedDisabled
1977$ 7,383$2,193$1,987$206$5,053$4,026$1,009$1372.32.04.9
19789,0452,4312,1862456,3864,9651,3982282.62.35.7
19799,8392,6352,3732636,8415,4591,3683632.62.35.2
198010,2752,9282,6372916,9325,6011,3224152.42.14.5
198112,4393,3202,9883328,7477,1911,5563722.62.44.7
198217,6273,8313,46037113,32311,2082,1154733.53.25.7
198319,1474,2273,83439314,23811,9372,3016823.43.15.9

Totals for 1977-1980 include interest on delayed transfers from general revenue.

NOTE: Totals do not necessarily equal the sum of the rounded components.

SOURCE: Annual Reports of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund.

The Medicaid program, financed by general tax revenue, also pays into the SMI trust fund. In 1983, State Medicaid programs having buy-in agreements with Medicare paid $300 million in SMI premiums on behalf of aged Medicaid recipients also eligible for SMI coverage—slightly less than a tenth of the total $4 billion in SMI premiums paid for the year. According to a study covering 1978, a greater proportion of buy-in enrollees than of the general enrollee population with both HI and SMI coverage use reimbursed services; further, reimbursement per user was higher for the buy-in group (McMillan ).

Cost-sharing under Medicare

The Medicare program rules require cost sharing on the part of enrollees who use services. These copayments take two forms, deductible and coinsurance. Copayments in the HI program differ from those in the SMI program. In addition, beneficiaries are liable for the costs of noncovered services and for some differences between what a provider charges and what Medicare reimburses. HI benefits are tied to a “benefit period.” Simply put, a benefit period begins with use of HI services and ends after the beneficiary has been out of a hospital or nursing home for 60 consecutive days. During each benefit period, the user must pay a deductible equal to the actuarily-determined cost of a day of care, currently $356. In addition, the user must pay a coinsurance amount for each covered day of care in a benefit period beyond the 60th day of inpatient hospital care and the 20th day of skilled nursing facility care. The coinsurance amount for a hospitalized patient is set at one-fourth of the deductible for the 61st through 90th day, and at one-half of the deductible for life-time reserve days. For the 21st through the 100th day of care in a skilled nursing facility, the coinsurance rate is set at one-eighth of the deductible. Just as there is no limit to the number of benefit periods to which an enrollee is entitled, there is no limit to the liability for deductibles and coinsurance. Deductible and coinsurance copayments of $1 billion were incurred by aged Medicare beneficiaries receiving HI inpatient care in 1977; by the end of 1984, copayments are projected to rise to $3.3 billion, an increase of 241 percent from 1977 (Table 27). From 1977 to 1983, copayments per enrollee increased 17.4 percent annually, due primarily to the increase in the inpatient hospital deductible (from $124 per benefit period in 1977 to $304 in 1983) and the attendant effects upon coinsurance.
Table 27

Medicare hospital insurance—estimated total and per enrollee deductible and coinsurance amounts for the aged: United States, 1977-1984

Calendar yearTotal in millionsPer enrollee2


DeductibleCoinsuranceTotal copaymentsDeductibleCoinsuranceTotal copayments
1977$ 756$216$ 973$33$ 9$ 42
19789072531,159381149
19791,0352971,333431255
19801,2393541,594501465
19811,4333981,831571673
1982 32,0266062,6327823102
1983 32,2336692,9038525110
1984 32,5657543,3189528123

April 1984 current-law estimates of copayment amounts based on 1984 Trustees Report—Alternative ll-B. Data are subject to revision.

Average annual enrollment is used to calculate these items.

Projected.

SOURCE: Office of Financial and Actuarial Analysis, Bureau of Data Management and Strategy, Health Care Financing Administration.

SMI benefits are paid after the beneficiary has met an annual deductible, currently $75. Users also are liable for coinsurance equal to 20 percent of most reimbursable charges. Unlike the HI deductible, the SMI deductible is tied to a calendar year rather than to a benefit period. Like the HI coinsurance, there is no limit on a beneficiary's coinsurance liability. Total copayments for SMI covered services to the aged are projected to reach $6.3 billion in 1984, comprising $1.6 billion in deductibles and $4.7 billion in coinsurance (Table 28). SMI copayments per enrollee increased 13.5 percent between 1977 and 1984.
Table 28

Medicare supplementary insurance—estimated total and per enrollee deductible and coinsurance amounts for the aged: United States, 1977-1984

Calendar yearTotal in millionsPerenrollee2


DeductibleCoinsuranceTotal copaymentsDeductibleCoinsuranceTotal copayments
1977$ 969$1,244$2,213$42$ 54$ 97
19781,0111,4542,4654362105
19791,0551,7362,7914472116
19801,1032,1123,2154586131
19811,1482,5763,72446103148
19821,5253,2354,76060126186
19831,5713,9675,53860152212
198431,6164,6786,29461175236

January 1984 current-law estimates of copayment amounts based on incurred charges. Data are subject to revision.

Average annual enrollment is used to calculate these items.

Projected.

SOURCE: Office of Financial and Actuarial Analysis, Bureau of Data Management and Strategy, Health Care Financing Administration.

SMI beneficiaries are responsible for what are known technically as reasonable charge reductions on unassigned claims. If a physician agrees to accept the Medicare allowed charge as payment in full—if he or she accepts assignment—the physician is reimbursed directly and the patient is liable only for the 20-percent coinsurance part of the allowed charge (assuming that the deductible has been met). If the physician does not accept assignment, the patient is liable for the total charge and is reimbursed by Medicare for the allowed portion of the charge (less any deductible and coinsurance owed). The difference between total charges and allowed charges is the reasonable charge reduction on the unassigned claim. From Medicare program data, we have estimated 1983 reasonable charge reductions for aged beneficiaries to be $2.2 billion, up from $0.7 billion in 1977; these data translate to $85 per enrollee in 1983 and $31 per enrollee in 1977. Finally, Medicare beneficiaries are liable for the costs of goods and services not covered by the program. Medicare was not intended to cover the full range of medical care available to the aged, but rather to reduce the financial burden of certain essential services. It does not cover prescription drugs and drug sundries, long-term nursing care, routine or preventive medical and dental care, or eyeglasses, nor does the program pay for deductible and coinsurance amounts incurred under other insurance plans.

Medicaid

The other large Government source of funds for personal health care is Medicaid. The program is projected to purchase $39 billion of care in 1984, 40 percent of it on behalf of aged recipients. Medicaid is projected to account for 13 percent of all spending for health care for the aged and for 42 percent of nursing home care in specific. Medicaid was established in 1966 by Title XIX of the Social Security Act. It is a joint Federal-State program that provides medical assistance to certain categories of low income people, including aged, blind, and disabled people and members of families with dependent children. The program is set up and run by individual States, under broad Federal guidelines; the Federal Government contributes, through what are called “matching funds,” a portion of the cost of providing medical benefits to the categorically eligible. If the State chooses, Federal matching funds also are available for medical benefits for the “medically needy”—people in one of the categories listed above who have incomes too high to qualify for cash assistance, but not adequate to pay their medical bills. The basic Federal formula match ratio—its share of Medicaid payments—for a given State is determined by a formula which incorporates the State's per capita personal income. The Federal formula match ratio currently ranges from 50 to 78 percent, with an estimated national average of 53 percent. Since Medicaid programs are administered by each participating State or jurisdiction, it is more difficult to obtain a central collection of data for Medicaid than it is for the Federal Medicare program. Medicaid statistics consist of counts of the number of recipients (people receiving services paid for by Medicaid) and expenditures. Data are not available on the number of people eligible to receive medical services under Medicaid, a number that changes daily.

Recipients

In 1982, almost 22 million people were recipients of medical care paid for by Medicaid. Recipient counts fluctuate from year to year, but over time, there has been a downward trend. This trend may be the result of States' attempts to curb Medicaid growth since, in most States, Medicaid expenditures have outpaced increases in revenues (Gibson, Waldo, and Levit, 1983). In any given year, the number of recipients 65 years and over ranges from 3 ½ to 4 million people, most of whom also are enrolled in Medicare. The elderly poor represent 15 to 17 percent of all Medicaid recipients, but account for 40 percent of program payments. Fiscal year 1980 data for 38 jurisdictions reporting recipient and payment information for aged and nonaged recipients indicate that the average medical vendor payment per aged recipient was $2,200, compared with $740 for nonaged recipients. In 1982, more than a quarter of all aged recipients received inpatient hospital services, 70 percent were treated by a physician, and 4 out of every 5 received prescription drugs.

Veterans' Administration

The Veterans' Administration (VA) spent $0.9 billion for health care for the aged in 1977 and expects to spend $3.3 billion in 1984. The VA provides care through Veterans' Administration medical centers across the United States, including 172 hospital centers, their associated outpatient clinics, and 101 nursing home units. Additional care is financed in community nursing homes, State veterans nursing homes, and through the Civilian Health and Medical Plan of the Veterans' Administration. The VA health care system was established to provide service-disabled veterans with health care for service-related conditions. Approximately 10 percent of the patients treated fall into this category; an additional 20 percent of the patients are service-disabled veterans with conditions unconnected to their service. Special groups, including aged and indigent veterans, account for the remaining 70 percent of the patients treated in VA facilities (CBO, 1984). Over the next 20 years, there will be dramatic changes in the VA population. The total number of veterans will be declining, but the average age of veterans will increase significantly, greatly affecting the cost of VA health care. Three-quarters of World War II veterans will reach age 65 by 1990, doubling the 1982 size of this age cohort (Table 29). In the year 2000, the number of veterans over 65 years of age will reach 9.0 million, accounting for 37 percent of the total veteran population.
Table 29

Veterans population, by age cohort: Selected years 1980-2030

YearTotal veterans populationAged veteransPercent of total veterans


Total 65 or over65-7475-8485 or overTotal 65 or over65-7475-8485 or over
198028,6403,0362,17764321610.67.62.20.8
198228,5223,5062,75345030312.39.71.61.1
198528,0144,8333,79277826217.313.52.80.9
199027,0647,1555,6211,32620826.420.84.90.8
199525,8028,5165,8462,35931133.022.79.11.2
200024,2598,9745,0073,45151637.020.614.22.1
201020,7108,1253,7233,0201,38339.218.014.66.7
202017,4617,7714,0532,3511,36744.523.213.57.8
203015,0865,7162,0652,4761,17537.913.716.47.8

SOURCE: Congressional Budget Office, Veterans' Administration Health Care Planning for Future Years.

The cost of VA health care for the aged in the future will rise not only due to the rising number of aged veterans, but also to the higher per capita cost associated with providing hospital care to the aged. The aged tend to have more frequent hospital stays: 12.3 percent of the veteran population accounted for 27 percent of all hospital discharges and 32.1 percent of all medical and surgical bed discharges in 1982. They require more expensive services: a VA hospital day in 1982 cost $191, but the cost of a medical bed-day and a surgical bed-day— which the elderly use more frequently—cost $199 and $271, respectively (Veterans' Administration, 1982). They also have longer lengths of stay: the 1982 average VA hospital length of stay was 26.6 days, but stays for aged veterans averaged 31.9 days (Veterans' Administration, June 1983). Similar utilization patterns exist for nursing homes. The discharge rate per 1,000 veterans 65 years or over is over four times that of the total veteran population (Table 30). Utilization for the population 85 years or over is the highest, at 14.9 discharges per 1,000 veterans. With the veteran population 85 years or over expected to grow 3.5 times by 2010, the increase in nursing home demand provided or funded by the VA could be significant.
Table 30

Use of Veterans' Administration hospital and nursing home care by aged veterans: 1982

AgeVeterans population in thousands(March, 1982)Hospital patients discharged from VA facilitiesNursing home patients discharged from VA and community facilities


NumberRate per 1,000 veteransVA nursing home care unitsCommunity nursing home care unitsTotalRate per 1,000 veterans
Total28,522956,88133.55,77317,82623,5990.8
65 and over3,506258,48273.73,54511,03714,5824.2
65-742,753175,60063.81,5114,9736,4842.4
75-8445044,90199.88502,7203,5707.9
85 or over30337,981125.41,1843,3444,52814.9

SOURCE: Veterans' Administration Annual Report, 1982.

Other Government programs

In addition to the three government programs mentioned already, there are other public sources of funds for health care for the aged (Gibson, Waldo, and Levit, 1983). They include: Department of Defense programs providing treatment to active and retired military forces, their survivors and dependents. Indian Health Services hospitals and clinics providing care to Indians and Alaskan natives. Workers' Compensation programs providing benefits for work-related disability and death. In 1982, about a third of the payments made under these programs were for medical services; the other two-thirds, not considered here, were income-loss payments for workers and survivors. State and local government hospitals providing community and psychiatric hospital services to citizens. Federal grant programs, including health block grants, preventive health grants, alcohol, drug abuse and mental health grants, and primary care grants, helping States and local governments to provide services to local populations. State and local public assistance programs, funding medical care for the poor who are not eligible for Medicaid or providing services not eligible for Federal matching funds under the Medicaid program. Other programs, providing temporary disability insurance and vocational rehabilitation.

Private health insurance

Private health insurance, although growing rapidly as a source of funds, is nowhere near as large a source of funds for the aged as for the general population. We estimate that private health insurance benefits will account for less than a tenth of all spending for health care for the aged, compared with more than a quarter of that for the general population. The extent of health insurance coverage for the aged varies by type of service. On the extensive end of the spectrum in 1981, about 60 percent of the aged population had private health insurance coverage of hospital expenses; on the other end of the spectrum, 12 percent had private coverage of major medical expenses (Table 31). Because of the extent of Medicare enrollment, much of private insurance coverage takes the form of “Medigap” insurance (Table 32). This “wrap-around” coverage usually pays the Medicare deductible and coinsurance amounts, but it has the same limits as Medicare with respect to covered services and length of stay. Thus, the aged are afforded little protection against catastrophic illness.
Table 31

Number of aged people with private health insurance protection, by type of coverage and type of insurer: United States, 1981

Type of insurerType of coverage

Hospital expenseSurgical expensePhysicians' expenseMajor medical expense

Number in thousands
Total115,61411,26010,6253,189
All insurance companies17,1752,6552,6551,319
 Group policies3,9911,8811,8811,334
 Individual and family policies5,1781,4021,402187
Blue Cross/Blue Shield 29,4308,4568,0281,000
Other4,3733,5113,2302,542

The data in these rows refer to the net total of people protected, that is, duplication among people protected by more than one kind of insuring organization or more than one insurance policy providing the same kind of coverage has been eliminated.

Estimated.

SOURCE: Health Insurance Association of America: Source book of health insurance data 1982-1983. Health Insurance Association of America. Washington, 1983.

Table 32

Number of aged people with selected types of private health insurance: 1981

Type of insuranceNumber of persons
Hospital indemnity3,078,000
Medicare Part A—hospital copayment coverage4,097,000
Medicare Part B—surgical copayment coverage2,655,000
Prescribed drugs and medicines1,319,000
Nursing home care2,177,000
Private duty nurse1,559,000

SOURCE: Health Insurance Association of America: Source book of health insurance data 1982-1983, Health Insurance Association of America. Washington, 1983.

The aged are less likely than the general population to be uninsured. In 1977, 4.3 percent of the aged population were without coverage of any kind, compared with 12.6 percent of the total population (Kasper, Walden, and Wilensky, 1980).

Out of pocket

The aged consumed $4,202 of health care per capita in 1984, of which $3,143 (or 75 percent) was paid by third parties of one kind or another. The remaining $1,059, termed direct patient payments or out-of-pocket payments in the National Health Accounts, is projected to represent a slightly smaller share of the health bill per capita in 1984 than it did in 1977. Out-of-pocket payments represent a net patient liability. Calculated as a residual, the difference between total expenditures and known third-party payments, the figure reflects Medicare copayments (less any Medigap benefits) and collected reasonable charge reductions, net private health insurance copayments, and the purchase of care not covered by any third party. Because of the prevalence of Medigap insurance, which tends to have the same coverage and limitations as Medicare does, three-quarters of 1984 out-of-pocket payments are projected to be for services other than hospital care and physicians' services: care that accounts for one-third of the total aged health bill. Out-of-pocket expenditures shown here are not the Only payments the aged make in connection with health care. The aged also pay private health insurance premiums, as well as the monthly SMI premium. Part of private health insurance premiums is returned in the form of benefits; consequently, for a more complete picture of payments by the aged for health, it may be useful to examine consumer payments—the sum of out-of-pocket expenditure and insurance benefits (Tables 11-14). Consumer payment for health care will come to almost a third of the total in 1984. (The difference between premiums and benefits—the net cost of health insurance—is considered a purchase of risk aversion rather than of medical services and is not included in these estimates. The net cost of private health insurance is generally positive, and that of SMI is negative.)

Summary

The aging of the population has placed an increasing strain on the mechanisms for financing health care consumption. From 11 percent of the civilian population in 1965, the group 65 years or over has risen to 12 percent in 1983 and is expected to reach 13 percent by the year 2000. The aged use more health services in general, and more hospital and nursing home care in specific, than the general population does. Thus, the aging of the population seems certain to increase demand for health care, and for the more expensive forms of health care, at a rate in excess of the growth of the population itself. Compounding the rate of growth of demand for health care, advances in medical technology have resulted simultaneously in better diagnosis and treatment of diseases that affect the elderly and in increased demand for those services. Without changes in reimbursement practices or coverage, the ability of Government programs to finance this increased demand will be diminished greatly. If current laws continue, for example, the Medicare HI trust fund could be exhausted as early as 1989 (Health Care Financing Administration, 1984). On a smaller scale, the Veterans' Administration could face a tripled demand for nursing home care at the turn of the century.
  7 in total

1.  Health spending in the 1980's: integration of clinical practice patterns with management.

Authors:  M S Freeland; C E Schendler
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1984

2.  Utilization of short-stay hospitals: annual summary of the United States, 1977.

Authors:  B J Haupt
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 13       Date:  1979-03

3.  Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey: United States, 1981.

Authors:  B Bloom
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 10       Date:  1982-10

4.  The National Nursing Home Survey: 1977 summary for the United States.

Authors: 
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 13       Date:  1979-07

5.  Changes in mortality among the elderly: United States, 1940-78. Supplement to 1980.

Authors: 
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 3       Date:  1984-04

6.  A study of the "crossover population": aged persons entitled to both Medicare and Medicaid.

Authors:  A McMillan; P L Pine; M Gornick; R Prihoda
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1983

7.  The use and costs of Medicare services in the last 2 years of life.

Authors:  J Lubitz; R Prihoda
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1984
  7 in total
  24 in total

1.  Unreimbursed expenses for medical care among urban elderly people.

Authors:  C Thomas; H R Kelman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1990-04

2.  Oral public health programs for the elderly: 1989.

Authors:  M S Strayer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Symposium.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1985-12

4.  Managing mental health services: some comments for the overdue debate in psychology.

Authors:  B L Bloom
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1990-02

5.  Antibiotic use in nursing homes: prevalence, cost and utilization review.

Authors:  K Crossley; K Henry; P Irvine; K Willenbring
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug

6.  Service use and costs for Medicare beneficiaries in risk-based HMOs and CMPs: some interim results from the National Medicare Competition Evaluation.

Authors:  L F Rossiter; L M Nelson; K W Adamache
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Estimating undersupply of nursing home beds in states.

Authors:  J H Swan; C Harrington
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  The substitution of nursing home for inpatient psychiatric care.

Authors:  J H Swan
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1987

9.  Private financing options for long-term care.

Authors:  B L Brody; H J Simon; D E Smallwood
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1987-09

10.  Effects of cost sharing on physiological health, health practices, and worry.

Authors:  E B Keeler; E M Sloss; R H Brook; B H Operskalski; G A Goldberg; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.