Literature DB >> 10301003

Twenty years of research on the quality of medical care: 1964-1984.

A Donabedian.   

Abstract

Since 1964 we have built on earlier work, with some refinements, particularly in the formulation of explicit criteria of process and outcome; the detailed standardization of case mix when outcomes signify quality; the prespecification of outcomes for follow-up, when adverse outcomes are only the occasion for later assessment of process; a greater emphasis on more subtle organizational characteristics in the study of structure; and the identification of the separate effects of structural attributes by multivariate analysis. We have also paid more systematic attention to questions of measurement, including the veracity and completeness of the record; the procedures of criteria formulation; and the reliability, validity, and screening efficiency of the criteria. A notable advance is the use of decision analysis to identify optimal strategies of care, including the introduction of patient preferences and monetary cost in the specification of such strategies, and the use of decisional algorithms to portray the criteria of quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 10301003     DOI: 10.1177/016327878500800301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  17 in total

1.  The effect of primary care physician supply and income inequality on mortality among blacks and whites in US metropolitan areas.

Authors:  L Shi; B Starfield
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  What is nursing home quality and how is it measured?

Authors:  Nicholas G Castle; Jamie C Ferguson
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2010-07-14

3.  Evaluation of "Live for Life", a health promotion programme in the County of Skaraborg, Sweden.

Authors:  H Lingfors; K Lindström; L G Persson; C Bengtsson; L Lissner
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Penetration of recommended procedures for lung cancer staging and management in the United States over 10 years: a quality research in radiation oncology survey.

Authors:  Ritsuko Komaki; Najma Khalid; Corey J Langer; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Jean B Owen; Cheryl L Crozier; J Frank Wilson; Xiong Wei; Benjamin Movsas
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Quality Versus Costs Related to Gastrointestinal Surgery: Disentangling the Value Proposition.

Authors:  Rohan Shah; Adrian Diaz; Marzia Tripepi; Fabio Bagante; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Nikolaos Machairas; Fragiska Sigala; Dimitrios Moris; Savio George Barreto; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  A Multi-institutional International Analysis of Textbook Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Curative-Intent Resection of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Katiuscha Merath; Qinyu Chen; Fabio Bagante; Sorin Alexandrescu; Hugo P Marques; Luca Aldrighetti; Shishir K Maithel; Carlo Pulitano; Matthew J Weiss; Todd W Bauer; Feng Shen; George A Poultsides; Olivier Soubrane; Guillaume Martel; B Groot Koerkamp; Alfredo Guglielmi; Endo Itaru; Jordan M Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Measuring quality in health care and its implications for pay-for-performance initiatives.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung; Melissa J Shauver
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.907

Review 8.  Measuring quality of surgical care: is it attainable?

Authors:  Kevin C Chung; Rod J Rohrich
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Characteristics of national registries for occupational diseases: international development and validation of an audit tool (ODIT).

Authors:  Dick Spreeuwers; Angela G E M de Boer; Jos H A M Verbeek; Frank J H van Dijk
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Outcome indicators in palliative care--how to assess quality and success. Focus group and nominal group technique in Germany.

Authors:  Tania Pastrana; Lukas Radbruch; Friedemann Nauck; Gerhard Höver; Martin Fegg; Martina Pestinger; Josef Ross; Norbert Krumm; Christoph Ostgathe
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.