Literature DB >> 10296157

The quality of QALYs (quality-adjusted-life-years): do QALYs measure what they at least intend to measure?

A Gafni.   

Abstract

This note alerts the readers to the fact that QALYs (quality-adjusted-life-years) do not stem directly from the individual's utility function and thus, at best, only partly reflect an individual's true preferences. This might lead to the choice of the non-preferred alternative due to the misrepresentation of the individual's preference. This is illustrated by using a simple example from Mehrez and Gafni (1989).

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 10296157     DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(89)90112-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  9 in total

Review 1.  Benefit valuation in economic evaluation of cancer therapies. A systematic review of the published literature.

Authors:  J Brown; M Sculpher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Bridging decision analytic modelling with a cross-sectional study. Application to Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  M J Nuijten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Principles of pharmacoeconomic analysis of drug therapy.

Authors:  D A Freund; R S Dittus
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Preference based outcome measures for economic evaluation of drug interventions: quality adjusted life years (QALYs) versus healthy years equivalents (HYEs).

Authors:  A Mehrez; A Gafni
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Assessing the benefits of health care: how far should we go?

Authors:  M Ryan; P Shackley
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-09

6.  Ionic versus nonionic contrast media: a burden or a bargain?

Authors:  A Gafni; C J Zylak
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Treatment Decisions for Babies with Trisomy 13 and 18.

Authors:  Isabella Pallotto; John D Lantos
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2017-09

Review 8.  Health policy approaches to measuring and valuing human life: conceptual and ethical issues.

Authors:  R H Morrow; J H Bryant
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Principlism and Personalism. Comparing Two Ethical Models Applied Clinically in Neonates Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.

Authors:  Matteo Di Nardo; Anna Dalle Ore; Giuseppina Testa; Gail Annich; Edoardo Piervincenzi; Giorgio Zampini; Gabriella Bottari; Corrado Cecchetti; Antonio Amodeo; Roberto Lorusso; Lorenzo Del Sorbo; Roxanne Kirsch
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.418

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.