Literature DB >> 10295520

Microrisks for medical decision analysis.

R A Howard.   

Abstract

Many would agree on the need to inform patients about the risks of medical conditions or treatments and to consider those risks in making medical decisions. The question is how to describe the risks and how to balance them with other factors in arriving at a decision. In this article, we present the thesis that part of the answer lies in defining an appropriate scale for risks that are often quite small. We propose that a convenient unit in which to measure most medical risks is the microprobability, a probability of 1 in 1 million. When the risk consequence is death, we can define a micromort as one microprobability of death. Medical risks can be placed in perspective by noting that we live in a society where people face about 270 micromorts per year from interactions with motor vehicles. Continuing risks or hazards, such as are posed by following unhealthful practices or by the side-effects of drugs, can be described in the same micromort framework. If the consequence is not death, but some other serious consequence like blindness or amputation, the microrisk structure can be used to characterize the probability of disability. Once the risks are described in the microrisk form, they can be evaluated in terms of the patient's willingness-to-pay to avoid them. The suggested procedure is illustrated in the case of a woman facing a cranial arteriogram of a suspected arterio-venous malformation. Generic curves allow such analyses to be performed approximately in terms of the patient's sex, age, and economic situation. More detailed analyses can be performed if desired. Microrisk analysis is based on the proposition that precision in language permits the soundness of thought that produces clarity of action and peace of mind.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 10295520     DOI: 10.1017/s026646230000742x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  4 in total

1.  Quantifying the risk of undetected HIV, hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus infection in Public Health Service increased risk donors.

Authors:  Jefferson M Jones; Brian M Gurbaxani; Alice Asher; Stephanie Sansom; Pallavi Annambhotla; Anne C Moorman; Saleem Kamili; John T Brooks; Sridhar V Basavaraju
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Foundational principles of classical Ayurveda research.

Authors:  Somik Raha
Journal:  J Ayurveda Integr Med       Date:  2013-10

3.  In-hospital mortality risk for total shoulder arthroplasty: A comprehensive review of the medicare database from 2005 to 2011.

Authors:  Frank McCormick; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Emmanouil B S Kiriakopoulos; William W Schairer; Matthew T Provencher; Jonathan Levy
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

4.  Plastic Surgeon Expertise in Predicting Breast Reconstruction Outcomes for Patient Decision Analysis.

Authors:  Clement S Sun; Gregory P Reece; Melissa A Crosby; Michelle C Fingeret; Roman J Skoracki; Mark T Villa; Matthew M Hanasono; Donald P Baumann; David W Chang; Scott B Cantor; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2013-11-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.