Literature DB >> 10294441

Changes in drug prescribing patterns related to commercial company funding of continuing medical education.

M A Bowman, D L Pearle.   

Abstract

In order to determine the impact of commercial company funding of continuing medical education (CME) courses, a survey was undertaken. Drug prescribing rates for drugs related to course content were determined by self-report survey of physician attendees (374 in number) for three different CME courses. The survey was performed immediately before and six months after the courses. A single, though different, drug company provided the majority of the funding for each course. Courses I and III were related to calcium channel blockers and Course II to beta blockers. The return rate before Course I was 73.0 percent; after, 54.0 percent (unmatched). The return rate for Course II was 49.4 percent before and 42.9 percent after (unmatched). There were 121 (61.4%) matched returns for Course III. While the rates for prescribing some of the related drugs increased after the courses, overall the sponsoring drug company's products were favored. Although physicians attending CME and accredited sponsors of CME need to be aware of this potential influence, the final burden of adequate evaluation of drugs remains with the physician prescriber. Further studies should be done to substantiate the findings and elucidate the mechanism(s) of the increase in sponsoring company's drug prescriptions.

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 10294441     DOI: 10.1002/chp.4750080104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof        ISSN: 0894-1912            Impact factor:   1.355


  29 in total

1.  [Psychiatrists and the pharmaceutical industry].

Authors:  H Helmchen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  The future sponsorship of CME in Canada: industry, government, physicians or a blend?

Authors:  Bernard Marlow
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  A survey of german physicians in private practice about contacts with pharmaceutical sales representatives.

Authors:  Klaus Lieb; Simone Brandtönies
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Does the C in CME stand for "Continuing" or "Commercial"?

Authors:  Joel Lexchin; Alan Cassels
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Association between physicians' interaction with pharmaceutical companies and their clinical practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hneine Brax; Racha Fadlallah; Lina Al-Khaled; Lara A Kahale; Hala Nas; Fadi El-Jardali; Elie A Akl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Is continuing medical education a drug-promotion tool?: YES.

Authors:  Michael A Steinman; Robert B Baron
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Doctors' education: the invisible influence of drug company sponsorship.

Authors:  Ray Moynihan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-23

8.  Pharmaceutical representatives.

Authors:  L Scarpinato
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Continuing education for general practice and the role of the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  T M Hayes; L A Allery; K G Harding; P A Owen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Misperceptions about beta-blockers and diuretics: a national survey of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Christopher Jepson; David A Asch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.