Literature DB >> 10291115

Quantitative issues in health-related quality of life assessment.

N K Aaronson.   

Abstract

The current interest in incorporating psychosocial outcomes into health care research raises a number of conceptual and methodological issues regarding the assessment of health-related quality of life. This paper offers an overview of some of the principal factors to consider in choosing or developing a quality of life measure, including: (a) the bandwidth-fidelity problem; (b) generic versus disease-specific focus; (C) level of data aggregation; (d) interview versus questionnaire; (e) question time-frame; (f) response scales; (g) psychometric properties; and (h) feasibility. While the discussion focuses on quantitative approaches to quality of life assessment, it is suggested that a mixture of quantitative and qualitative strategies may be most fruitful.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 10291115     DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(88)90058-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  11 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life and neurological illness: a review of the literature.

Authors:  R Murrell
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  Quality of life: a model for evaluating health for all. Conceptual considerations and policy implications.

Authors:  B Lindström
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1992

Review 3.  Evaluation of instruments for measuring the burden of sport and active recreation injury.

Authors:  Nadine E Andrew; Belinda J Gabbe; Rory Wolfe; Peter A Cameron
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Definitions of quality of life: what has happened and how to move on.

Authors:  Marcel W M Post
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2014

5.  Quality of life of caregivers.

Authors:  Janna M Glozman
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.444

6.  Quantitative tool to evaluate the somatic burden due to chemotherapy-induced adverse events: the somatic burden score.

Authors:  Michael Koehler; Thomas Fischer; Siegfried Kropf; Joerg Frommer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Measurement equivalence of osteoporosis-specific and general quality-of-life instruments in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal women.

Authors:  Lisa M Lix; Colleen Metge; William D Leslie
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-03-29       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Measuring psychosocial outcomes: is the consumer or the professional the best judge?

Authors:  C Paul; R Sanson-Fisher; M Carey
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.520

9.  A daily diary for quality of life measurement in advanced breast cancer trials.

Authors:  S C Fraser; A J Ramirez; S R Ebbs; L J Fallowfield; H J Dobbs; M A Richards; T Bates; M Baum
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Construct validity of the Assessment of Quality of Life - 6D (AQoL-6D) in community samples.

Authors:  Joanne Allen; Kerry J Inder; Terry J Lewin; John R Attia; Brian J Kelly
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.