Literature DB >> 10287625

Consensus conferences in different countries. Aims and perspectives.

P B Andreasen.   

Abstract

The different models of consensus development conferences (CDCs) are analyzed in relation to democratic technology assessment. In some countries CDCs are mainly concerned with influencing the quality of clinical practice and thus are dominated by medical experts. In other countries, CDCs are directed towards the public and the decision makers on the political and administrative level. The Danish experience demonstrates that CDCs may be a forceful social technology with a strong potential to influence decisions about medical as well as non-medical technology.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 10287625     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300004104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  7 in total

Review 1.  Impact of varying panel membership on ratings of appropriateness in consensus panels: a comparison of a multi- and single disciplinary panel.

Authors:  I Coulter; A Adams; P Shekelle
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Researching the Appropriateness of Care in the Complementary and Integrative Health Professions: Part I.

Authors:  Ian D Coulter; Patricia M Herman; Gery W Ryan; Ronald D Hays; Lara G Hilton; Margaret D Whitley
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  The challenge of determining appropriate care in the era of patient-centered care and rising health care costs.

Authors:  Ian Coulter; Patricia Herman; Gery Ryan; Lara Hilton; Ron D Hays
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2018-12-24

4.  Coordination of guidelines development.

Authors:  A D Oxman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Clinical practice guidelines: from methodological to practical issues.

Authors:  N Roche; P Durieux
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Enhancing the Behaviour Change Wheel with synthesis, stakeholder involvement and decision-making: a case example using the 'Enhancing the Quality of Psychological Interventions Delivered by Telephone' (EQUITy) research programme.

Authors:  Cintia L Faija; Judith Gellatly; Michael Barkham; Karina Lovell; Kelly Rushton; Charlotte Welsh; Helen Brooks; Kerry Ardern; Penny Bee; Christopher J Armitage
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  SEaRCH™ expert panel process: streamlining the link between evidence and practice.

Authors:  Ian Coulter; Pamela Elfenbaum; Shamini Jain; Wayne Jonas
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-01-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.