Literature DB >> 10276357

Liability and liability insurance for medical malpractice.

P M Danzon.   

Abstract

Physicians typically carry virtually complete malpractice insurance coverage. This contradicts standard theoretical predictions that under a negligence rule of liability there should be no demand for insurance, and insurance policies under moral hazard will contain co-payment provisions. It is argued that judicial 'errors' in defining negligence generate a demand for liability and legal defense insurance. Physician co-payment undermines the insurer's incentives for legal defense and thus induces a trade-off between loss reduction by injury prevention and by legal defense. Fee-for-service reimbursement further distorts the physician's choice between injury prevention and insurance. Implications for the deterrent function of the tort system are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 10276357     DOI: 10.1016/0167-6296(85)90011-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  3 in total

1.  The importance of negative defensive medicine in the effects of malpractice reform.

Authors:  Daniel Montanera
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-04-09

2.  Physician-patient relationship and medical accident victim compensation: some insights into the French regulatory system.

Authors:  Lydie Ancelot; Cornel Oros
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-05-18

3.  Malpractice liability, technology choice and negative defensive medicine.

Authors:  Eberhard Feess
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-01-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.