| Literature DB >> 10276357 |
Abstract
Physicians typically carry virtually complete malpractice insurance coverage. This contradicts standard theoretical predictions that under a negligence rule of liability there should be no demand for insurance, and insurance policies under moral hazard will contain co-payment provisions. It is argued that judicial 'errors' in defining negligence generate a demand for liability and legal defense insurance. Physician co-payment undermines the insurer's incentives for legal defense and thus induces a trade-off between loss reduction by injury prevention and by legal defense. Fee-for-service reimbursement further distorts the physician's choice between injury prevention and insurance. Implications for the deterrent function of the tort system are discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1985 PMID: 10276357 DOI: 10.1016/0167-6296(85)90011-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Econ ISSN: 0167-6296 Impact factor: 3.883