Literature DB >> 10271140

Deaths during general anesthesia: technology-related, due to human error, or unavoidable? An ECRI technology assessment.

.   

Abstract

More than 2,000 healthy Americans die each year during general anesthesia, and at least half of these deaths may be preventable. Anesthetists and equipment manufacturers have made considerable progress in improving anesthesia safety. However, much more needs to be done, especially in "human-factors" areas such as improved training, consistent use of preanesthesia checklists, and anesthetists' willingness to enhance their vigilance by using appropriate monitoring equipment. While defective equipment and supplies are the direct cause of relatively few deaths, inexpensive oxygen analyzers and disconnect alarms could, if available in more ORs, warn anesthetists in time to convert many deaths to near misses. Some anesthetists are using other monitoring technologies that are more costly, but can detect a wider range of problems. The anesthesia community could expand its anesthesia-safety leadership and guidance, by improving technology-related training and by developing practice standards for anesthetists and safety standards for equipment. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals could impose specific safety requirements on hospitals; malpractice insurance carriers could require anesthetists and hospitals to use monitors and alarms during all procedures; and the Food and Drug Administration could actively stimulate and oversee these efforts and perhaps provide seed money for some of them. The necessary equipment costs would likely be offset by long-term savings in malpractice premiums, as anesthesia incidents are the most costly of all types of malpractice claims. Concerted efforts such as these could greatly reduce the number of avoidable anesthesia-related deaths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 10271140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Technol        ISSN: 0748-075X


  6 in total

1.  Specific elements of a new hemodynamics display improves the performance of anesthesiologists.

Authors:  G T Blike; S D Surgenor; K Whalen; J Jensen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  A graphical object display improves anesthesiologists' performance on a simulated diagnostic task.

Authors:  G T Blike; S D Surgenor; K Whalen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  The upgrading and replacement of anaesthetic equipment: a provincial approach.

Authors:  R M Friesen; G Hatton; J Bjornson
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  1986 meeting of the international committee for prevention of anesthesia mortality and morbidity.

Authors:  J B Cooper; J M Davies; J M Desmonts; J L Lunn; J F Crul; E C Pierce; A P Adams
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 5.  Anesthetic mishaps and the cost of monitoring: a proposed standard for monitoring equipment.

Authors:  C Whitcher; A K Ream; D Parsons; D Rubsamen; J Scott; M Champeau; W Sterman; L Siegel
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1988-01

6.  Why investigate vigilance?

Authors:  J S Gravenstein; M B Weinger
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1986-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.