Literature DB >> 10269357

Quality circles after the fad.

E E Lawler, S A Mohrman.   

Abstract

On the face of it, it makes sense, If you want to involve your employees more in decision making and shift the organization toward a more participative culture, starting suggestion groups called quality circles seems to be a risk-free way to begin. Having studied many quality circles in different organizations, the authors of this article conclude that quality circles have their distinct advantages but that they have inherent in their design numbers of factors that often lead them to self-destruct. Quality circles are also said to be a poor forerunner for more participative approaches to management. Changing a quality circle into an institutionalized participative structure involves making many changes in important features of the organization that do not naturally flow from the implementation of a circle program. The authors describe the stages that quality circles go through, discuss the various threats they must survive, and then outline the most effective uses that managers can make of them.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 10269357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Harv Bus Rev        ISSN: 0017-8012


  2 in total

1.  Packages of participation: Swedish employees' experience of Lean depends on how they are involved.

Authors:  Mikael Brännmark; Richard J Holden
Journal:  IIE Trans Occup       Date:  2013

2.  Reskilling and Upskilling the Future-ready Workforce for Industry 4.0 and Beyond.

Authors:  Ling Li
Journal:  Inf Syst Front       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.261

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.