Literature DB >> 10259866

Peer review--a study of reliability.

S J Ceci, D P Peters.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1982        PMID： 10259866     DOI： 10.1080/00091383.1982.10569910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Change        ISSN： 0009-1383


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Parafraud in biology.

Authors:  Harold Hillman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing.

Authors:  S Triaridis; A Kyrgidis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.471

3.  Prestige bias--an old, untreated enemy of the peer-review process.

Authors:  G Bazoukis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2020 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 4.  The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Sayaka Sato; Pascal Mark Gygax; Julian Randall; Marianne Schmid Mast
Journal:  High Educ (Dordr)       Date:  2020-10-03

5.  Alternatives to peer review: novel approaches for research evaluation.

Authors:  Aliaksandr Birukou; Joseph Rushton Wakeling; Claudio Bartolini; Fabio Casati; Maurizio Marchese; Katsiaryna Mirylenka; Nardine Osman; Azzurra Ragone; Carles Sierra; Aalam Wassef
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science.

Authors:  Martin Almquist; Regula S von Allmen; Dan Carradice; Steven J Oosterling; Kirsty McFarlane; Bas Wijnhoven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.