Literature DB >> 1025055

Validation of an interval scaling: the sickness impact profile.

W B Carter, R A Bobbitt, M Bergner, B S Gilson.   

Abstract

The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) is a measure of sickness-related behavioral dysfunction consisting of 189 items in 14 topic categories. To increase its discrimination, precision, and sensitivity in accounting for variance, the decision was made to scale the instrument. A two-step direct scaling procedure was used in order to avoid the monumental scaling tasks required by indirect procedures that guarantee equal-interval results; but because an equal-interval scale was needed, it was necessary to validate the scale values obtained and investigated the equal-intervval properties of the obtained scale. A three-stage validation process is described, consisting of an initial scaling by a group of 25 health professionals and students in 1973, a second scaling by 108 members of a prepaid group health plan in 1975, and an investigation of the metric properties of the resulting scale values. In addition, the concept of dysfunction underlying the SIP was validated. SIP scores from a field trial were compared with mean ratings of severity of dysfunction represented by the combinations of checked items from which the scores were derived.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1025055      PMCID: PMC1071949     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  3 in total

1.  The sickness impact profile. Development of an outcome measure of health care.

Authors:  B S Gilson; J S Gilson; M Bergner; R A Bobbit; S Kressel; W E Pollard; M Vesselago
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Successive intervals analysis of preference measures in a health status index.

Authors:  W R Blischke; J W Bush; R M Kaplan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The sickness impact profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure.

Authors:  M Bergner; R A Bobbitt; S Kressel; W E Pollard; B S Gilson; J R Morris
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.663

  3 in total
  24 in total

Review 1.  A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  S J Coons; S Rao; D L Keininger; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Health state valuations from the general public using the visual analogue scale.

Authors:  C Gudex; P Dolan; P Kind; A Williams
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness.

Authors:  H Beckerman; M E Roebroeck; G J Lankhorst; J G Becher; P D Bezemer; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Quality of life following endonasal skull base surgery.

Authors:  Harshita Pant; Amol M Bhatki; Carl H Snyderman; Allan D Vescan; Ricardo L Carrau; Paul Gardner; Daniel Prevedello; Amin B Kassam
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2010-01

Review 5.  Assessment of quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: methods and implications.

Authors:  P Bendtsen; I Akerlind; J O Hörnquist
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey and its use in pharmacoeconomic evaluation.

Authors:  J Brazier
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Using health-related quality-of-life information: clinical encounters, clinical trials, and health policy.

Authors:  J Tsevat; J C Weeks; E Guadagnoli; A N Tosteson; C M Mangione; J S Pliskin; M C Weinstein; P D Cleary
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Pitfalls in measuring the health status of Mexican Americans: comparative validity of the English and Spanish Sickness Impact Profile.

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Measuring quality of life with the sickness impact profile: a pilot study.

Authors:  R G Hulsebos; F W Beltman; D dos Reis Miranda; J F Spangenberg
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  The quality of life impact of peripheral versus central vision loss with a focus on glaucoma versus age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Keith Evans; Simon K Law; John Walt; Patricia Buchholz; Jan Hansen
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.