Literature DB >> 10234586

Determinants of peak bone mass: clinical and genetic analyses in a young female Canadian cohort.

L A Rubin1, G A Hawker, V D Peltekova, L J Fielding, R Ridout, D E Cole.   

Abstract

Peak bone mass has been shown to be a significant predictor of risk for osteoporosis. Previous studies have demonstrated that skeletal mass accumulation is under strong genetic control, and efforts have been made to identify candidate loci. Determinants of peak bone mass also include diet, physical activity, hormonal status, and other clinical factors. The overall contribution of these factors, genetic and nongenetic, and their interaction in determining peak bone density status have not been delineated. Six hundred and seventy-seven healthy unrelated Caucasian women ages 18-35 years were assessed. A detailed, standardized interview was conducted to evaluate lifestyle factors, menstrual and reproductive history, medical conditions, medication use, and family history of osteoporosis. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and the femoral neck (hip) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Genotyping of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) locus at three polymorphic sites (BsmI, ApaI, and TaqI) was performed. In bivariate analyses, BMD at the lumbar spine and hip was positively correlated with weight, height, body mass index (BMI), and level of physical activity, both now and during adolescence, but negatively correlated with a family history of osteoporosis. Hip, but not spine BMD, correlated positively with dietary intake of calcium, and negatively with amenorrhea of more than 3 months, with caffeine intake, and with age. Spine, but not hip BMD, correlated positively with age and with number of pregnancies. VDR haplotype demonstrated significant associations with BMD at the hip, level of physical activity currently, and BMI. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of greater BMD (at the hip or spine) were: age (younger for the hip, older for the spine), greater body weight, greater height (hip only), higher level of physical activity now and during adolescence, no family history of osteoporosis, and VDR genotype (hip only). Weight, age, level of physical activity, and family history are independent predictors of peak BMD. Of these factors, weight accounts for over half the explained variability in BMD. VDR alleles are significant independent predictors of peak femoral neck, but not lumbar spine BMD, even after adjusting for family history of osteoporosis, weight, age, and exercise. However, the overall contribution of this genetic determinant is modest. Taken together, these factors explained approximately 17% and 21% of the variability in peak spine and hip BMD, respectively, in our cohort. Future research should be aimed at further evaluation of genetic determinants of BMD. Most importantly, understanding the critical interactive nature between genes and the environment will facilitate development of targeted strategies directed at modifying lifestyle factors as well as earlier intervention in the most susceptible individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10234586     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.4.633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  40 in total

Review 1.  Osteoporosis in chronic liver disease.

Authors:  J Heathcote
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  1999-12

2.  Lessons from the Women's Health Initiative: primary prevention and gender health.

Authors:  Anna Day
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-08-20       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Peak bone mineral area density and determinants among females aged 9 to 24 years in Mexico.

Authors:  Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Juan Tamayo; Aurelio Cruz-Valdez; Rodrigo Díaz; Bernardo Hernández; Ramón Del Cueto; Mauricio Hernández-Avila
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club.

Authors:  Steven Boonen; Jean-Jacques Body; Yves Boutsen; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Stefan Goemaere; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Serge Rozenberg; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Bone status of Indian women from a low-income group and its relationship to the nutritional status.

Authors:  Veena Shatrugna; Bharati Kulkarni; P Ajay Kumar; K Usha Rani; N Balakrishna
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Impaired muscle strength is associated with fractures in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  S A Jamal; R E Leiter; V Jassal; C J Hamilton; D C Bauer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Genetic determinants of bone mineral content in premature infants.

Authors:  M C Backström; A Mahonen; M Ala-Houhala; H Sievänen; P Mäenpää; A M Koivisto; A Olkku; R Mäki; M Mäki
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.747

8.  Higher prevalence of osteoporosis among female Holocaust survivors.

Authors:  E-L Marcus; J Menczel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Risk factors for low bone mass in healthy 40-60 year old women: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  E J Waugh; M-A Lam; G A Hawker; J McGowan; A Papaioannou; A M Cheung; A B Hodsman; W D Leslie; K Siminoski; S A Jamal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  CD38 is associated with premenopausal and postmenopausal bone mineral density and postmenopausal bone loss.

Authors:  Frances J Drummond; John J Mackrill; Kathleen O'sullivan; Mary Daly; Fergus Shanahan; Michael G Molloy
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.