Does the endoscopic incision of ureteroceles reduce the indications for partial nephrectomy?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the endoscopic incision of ureteroceles reduces the indications for partial nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1987 and 1996, endoscopic incision was used as the first-line treatment of 18 children (13 boys, five girls, aged 8 days to 6 months) with a duplex-system ureterocele diagnosed antenatally (15) or in the first weeks of life during the course of a urinary infection (three). Of the 19 ureteroceles (one bilateral), four were intravesical and 15 ectopic, according to the American Academy of Paediatrics classification. Vesico-ureteric reflux into the inferior pole of the kidney was present in 10 children, seven of whom had an ectopic ureterocele. A functioning upper pole was detected by intravenous pyelography (IVP) in half the intravesical and in a third of the ectopic ureteroceles.
RESULTS: Endoscopic incision resulted in decompression and reduction of dilatation in 16 cases; three with inferior pole reflux resolved on control cystography, whilst in seven with an ectopic ureterocele, reflux into the upper urinary tract was induced by endoscopic incision. In three children with an ectopic ureterocele, renal function had improved at 3 months, as assessed by IVP. Endoscopic incision was the only treatment for half the intravesical and six of 15 ectopic ureteroceles. Overall, nephrectomy was required in four of 18 patients (three partial nephrectomies for persistent dilatation and one total nephrectomy). Five nonfunctioning, undilated upper poles with no reflux were left in place. Nine vesico-ureteric reimplantations for persistent or induced reflux were carried out using the Cohen technique.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic incision can allow the deferral of nephrectomy, facilitate lower urinary tract reconstruction and reduce the indications for partial nephrectomy, if it is accepted that a nonfunctioning, undilated renal pole with no reflux can safely be left in place.