Literature DB >> 10233218

Sunscreen application by photosensitive patients is inadequate for protection.

R M Azurdia1, J A Pagliaro, B L Diffey, L E Rhodes.   

Abstract

Photosensitive patients often comment that sunscreen products seem of little benefit. We used fluorescence spectroscopy to assess quantitatively their sunscreen application technique. A dose-response relationship for sunscreen skin surface thickness and fluorescence intensity was determined for an intrinsically fluorescent sunscreen, Neutrogena sun protection factor (SPF) 15. Ten women with long-standing photosensitivity conditions were asked to apply this sunscreen in the manner they would normally on a bright sunny day. Fluorescence measurements were taken from all unclothed body areas, comprising 17 sites of the head, neck, upper and lower limbs. Geometric regression analysis of the dose-response data showed a high level of correlation (r = 0.99) between sunscreen thickness and fluorescence intensity, allowing fluorescence measurements to be converted to an equivalent sunscreen thickness. The overall median sunscreen thickness was 0.5 mg/cm2, with median thicknesses of individual sites ranging from 0 to 1.2 mg/cm2. The most frequently missed sites were the posterior neck, lateral neck, temples and ears, all of which had median thicknesses of 0 mg/cm2. Hence, photosensitive patients fail to apply sunscreen in some prominently exposed sites, and use average thicknesses far less than the manufacturers' recommendation (2 mg/cm2). The level of protection is much lower than anticipated from the stated SPF of the product.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10233218     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02658.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  17 in total

1.  Has the sun protection factor had its day? Information on sunscreens should warn against excessive sun exposure.

Authors:  P Autier; G Severi; J F Doré; M Boniol
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

Review 2.  [Sun protection factor 50+ : Pro and contra].

Authors:  T Herzinger
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  User-centered development of a smart phone mobile application delivering personalized real-time advice on sun protection.

Authors:  David B Buller; Marianne Berwick; James Shane; Ilima Kane; Kathleen Lantz; Mary Klein Buller
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Compliance with sunscreen advice in a survey of adults engaged in outdoor winter recreation at high-elevation ski areas.

Authors:  David B Buller; Peter A Andersen; Barbara J Walkosz; Michael D Scott; Julie A Maloy; Mark B Dignan; Gary R Cutter
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 5.  Molecular mechanisms of inhibition of photocarcinogenesis by silymarin, a phytochemical from milk thistle (Silybum marianum L. Gaertn.) (Review).

Authors:  Mudit Vaid; Santosh K Katiyar
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.650

6.  Evaluation of a Sunscreen Product Compared with Reference Standards P3, P5 and P8 in Outdoor Conditions: a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Intra-individual Study in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Corinne Granger; Gitanjali Petkar; Muzzammil Hosenally; Javier Bustos; Carles Trullàs; Thierry Passeron; Jean Krutmann
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-09-29

7.  Knowledge, attitudes and behaviour in the sun: the barriers to behavioural change in Northern Ireland.

Authors:  T Owen; D Fitzpatrick; O Dolan; A Gavin
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2004-11

8.  A randomized controlled trial of green tea catechins in protection against ultraviolet radiation-induced cutaneous inflammation.

Authors:  Mark D Farrar; Anna Nicolaou; Kayleigh A Clarke; Sarah Mason; Karen A Massey; Tristan P Dew; Rachel E B Watson; Gary Williamson; Lesley E Rhodes
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Sun Protection Behavior Following Skin Cancer Resection and Reconstruction.

Authors:  I J Veldhuizen; E Schroen; E H Lee; N R Kurtansky; S W Dusza; R R W J van der Hulst; A L Pusic; M M Hoogbergen
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 1.771

10.  Sun protection preferences and behaviors among young adult males during maximum ultraviolet radiation exposure activities.

Authors:  Marilyn Wickenheiser; Mary Kate Baker; Rikki Gaber; Hanz Blatt; June K Robinson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.