Literature DB >> 10232815

A macropencil beam model: clinical implementation for conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy.

M H Phillips1, K M Singer, A R Hounsell.   

Abstract

The increasing use of irregularly shaped, off-centre fields in advanced treatment techniques, particularly intensity modulated radiation therapy, has strained the limits of conventional, broad-beam dose calculation algorithms. More recent models, such as kernel-based pencil beams and Monte Carlo methods, are accurate but suffer from the time needed for calculations and from the lack of clearly established methods for determining the parameters needed to match calculations with the particular dosimetric characteristics of an individual machine. This paper presents the implementation of a model that uses an extended source model to calculate the variation of fluence at the patient surface for any arbitrarily shaped field. It uses a macropencil beam model to calculate phantom scatter. Both head scatter and phantom scatter models use exponential functions fit to a series of measurements to determine the model's parameters. The means by which the model can be implemented in a clinical setting using standard dosimetric equipment is presented. Results for two separate machines and three energies are presented. Comparisons with measurements for a set of regular and irregular fields demonstrate the accuracy of the model for conventional, conformal and intensity modulated treatments. For rectangular and irregular fields at depths up to 20 cm, the accuracy was better than < or =1.5%, compared with errors of up to 7.5% with a standard algorithm. For a 20-step intensity modulated field, the accuracy was 3.4% compared with 18% with the conventional algorithm. The advantages of this model for IMRT are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10232815     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/4/018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  The use of a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm to increase flexibility in the search for better IMRT plans.

Authors:  Clay Holdsworth; Minsun Kim; Jay Liao; Mark Phillips
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A hierarchical evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization in IMRT.

Authors:  Clay Holdsworth; Minsun Kim; Jay Liao; Mark H Phillips
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Two-step intensity modulated arc therapy (2-step IMAT) with segment weight and width optimization.

Authors:  Jidi Sun; Theam Yong Chew; Juergen Meyer
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Use of intensity modulation for missing tissue compensation of pediatric spinal fields.

Authors:  M H Phillips; P S Cho; H Parsai; J G Douglas
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.