Literature DB >> 10232694

Body composition in renal transplant patients: bioimpedance analysis compared to isotope dilution, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, and anthropometry.

E C van den Ham1, J P Kooman, M H Christiaans, F H Nieman, B K Van Kreel, G A Heidendal, J P Van Hooff.   

Abstract

Whether multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MF-BIA), a relatively new method for measuring body composition, is also applicable for accurate body composition measurements in renal transplant (RTx) patients is not known. Therefore, the use of MF-BIA is validated in 77 RTx patients with a stable renal function at least 2 yr posttransplantation. MF-BIA is compared to isotope dilution techniques for measurement of body water compartments, and to dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and anthropometry for measurement of fat and fat free mass. Finally, DEXA and anthropometry are compared to each other. Method agreement is assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and plotted by Bland and Altman analysis. MF-BIA significantly underestimates total body water (TBW, 0.7+/-2.1 L) and overestimates the extracellular water (ECW, 3.3+/-1.8 L) compared to isotope dilution; the ICC between both techniques is 0.943 for TBW and 0.846 for ECW. The percentage body fat (BF) measured by MF-BIA is significantly higher than both BF measured by DEXA (3.4+/-4.7%) or by anthropometry (5.5+/-5.2%). The ICC between MF-BIA and DEXA is 0.887 and between MF-BIA and anthropometry 0.856. BF measured by DEXA is significantly higher than BF measured by anthropometry (2.1+/-4.4%); their ICC is 0.913. In conclusion, MF-BIA seems to be suitable for measurement of TBW in RTx patients; however, method agreement between isotope dilution and MF-BIA for the measurement of ECW is not satisfactory. In the assessment of fat and fat free mass, the reliability of MF-BIA appears to be questionable. Method agreement between DEXA and anthropometry seems to be slightly better.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10232694     DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V1051067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  14 in total

1.  Novel equations to estimate lean body mass in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Nazanin Noori; Csaba P Kovesdy; Rachelle Bross; Martin Lee; Antigone Oreopoulos; Deborah Benner; Rajnish Mehrotra; Joel D Kopple; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  The Effect of Fluid Overload on Clinical Outcome in Southern Chinese Patients Undergoing Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Qunying Guo; Jianxiong Lin; Jianying Li; Chunyan Yi; Haiping Mao; Xiao Yang; Xueqing Yu
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Monitoring intracellular, interstitial, and intravascular volume changes during fluid management procedures.

Authors:  Leslie D Montgomery; Wayne A Gerth; Richard W Montgomery; Susie Q Lew; Michael M Klein; Julian M Stewart; Marvin S Medow; Manuel T Velasquez
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Clinical practice guideline exercise and lifestyle in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Luke A Baker; Daniel S March; Thomas J Wilkinson; Roseanne E Billany; Nicolette C Bishop; Ellen M Castle; Joseph Chilcot; Mark D Davies; Matthew P M Graham-Brown; Sharlene A Greenwood; Naushad A Junglee; Archontissa M Kanavaki; Courtney J Lightfoot; Jamie H Macdonald; Gabriella M K Rossetti; Alice C Smith; James O Burton
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  Comparison of bioimpedance and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for measurement of fat mass in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Alessio Molfino; Burl R Don; George A Kaysen
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2013-05-09

6.  Relationship between body fat and BMI in a US hispanic population-based cohort study: Results from HCHS/SOL.

Authors:  William W Wong; Garrett Strizich; Moonseong Heo; Steven B Heymsfield; John H Himes; Cheryl L Rock; Marc D Gellman; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Sonia M Davis; Elva M Arredondo; Linda Van Horn; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Lisa Sanchez-Johnsen; Robert C Kaplan; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Effect of resistance exercise volume and complexity on EMG, strength, and regional body composition.

Authors:  Jeffrey M McBride; John B Blaak; Travis Triplett-McBride
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-08-16       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Prevalence and risk factors of fluid overload in Southern Chinese continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Qunying Guo; Chunyan Yi; Jianying Li; Xiaofeng Wu; Xiao Yang; Xueqing Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A randomized controlled trial of long term effect of BCM guided fluid management in MHD patients (BOCOMO study): rationales and study design.

Authors:  Li Liu; Gang Long; Jianwei Ren; Jijun Li; Jinsheng Xu; Jinghong Lei; Mao Li; Moyan Qiu; Ping Yuan; Weiming Sun; Shan Lin; Wenjun Liu; Yi Sun; Yingchun Ma; Yonghui Mao; Yulan Shen; Li Zuo
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Estimation of body fluid volume by bioimpedance spectroscopy in patients with hyponatremia.

Authors:  Jae Seok Kim; Jun Young Lee; Hyeoncheol Park; Byoung Geun Han; Seung Ok Choi; Jae Won Yang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.