Literature DB >> 10232507

Dynamic T1-weighted spin-echo MR imaging: the role of digital subtraction in the demonstration of enhancing brain lesions.

E R Melhem1, N R Mehta.   

Abstract

We compared subtracted and non-subtracted images obtained from a contrast-enhanced dynamic T1-weighted spin echo (SE) magnetic resonance (MR) technique for the demonstration of enhancing brain lesions with and without associated hemorrhage. Thirty-four patients with enhancing brain lesions or subacute parenchymal hematomas were imaged using a contrast-enhanced dynamic T1-weighted SE MR technique modified by a keyhole scheme. On-line digital subtraction was performed. Non-subtracted and subtracted dynamic scans were compared for conspicuity and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of enhancing brain lesions. The presence and pattern of enhancement in the subacute parenchymal hematomas were evaluated on the subtracted images. In all, 47 enhancing brain lesions were detected on both the non-subtracted and the subtracted images. The enhancing brain lesions were more conspicuous on the subtracted images (P < 0.05). There was an increase in CNRs of the enhancing lesions on the subtracted images compared with the non-subtracted ones (P < 0.001). Seventeen subacute parenchymal hematomas were detected on the non-subtracted images. The subtracted images demonstrated enhancement in 15 hematomas (8 rim enhancement only/7 both nodular and rim enhancement). Digital subtraction in contrast-enhanced dynamic T1-weighted SE MR imaging is helpful in demonstrating enhancing brain lesions with and without associated hemorrhage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10232507     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199904)9:4<503::aid-jmri1>3.0.co;2-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  11 in total

1.  Utility of fat-suppressed FLAIR and subtraction imaging in detecting meningeal abnormalities.

Authors:  Alexander McKinney; Chris Palmer; James Short; Leandro Lucato; Charles Truwit
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Current concepts and challenges in the radiologic assessment of brain tumors in children: part 2.

Authors:  Benita Tamrazi; Kshitij Mankad; Marvin Nelson; Felice D'Arco
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-09-13

3.  Emerging techniques and technologies in brain tumor imaging.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Martin Bendszus; A Gregory Sorensen; Whitney B Pope
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  How treatment monitoring is influencing treatment decisions in glioblastomas.

Authors:  Martha R Neagu; Raymond Y Huang; David A Reardon; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Consensus recommendations on standardized magnetic resonance imaging protocols for multicenter canine brain tumor clinical trials.

Authors:  Rebecca A Packer; John H Rossmeisl; Michael S Kent; John F Griffin; Christina Mazcko; Amy K LeBlanc
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 1.363

6.  Quantitative contrast ratio comparison between T1 (TSE at 1.5T, FLAIR at 3T), magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo and subtraction imaging at 1.5T and 3T.

Authors:  Richard Keith Downs; Mariah Haider Bashir; Chin Kau Ng; Jens Olaf Heidenreich
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-06

7.  A Simple Automated Method for Detecting Recurrence in High-Grade Glioma.

Authors:  T K Yanagihara; J Grinband; J Rowley; K A Cauley; A Lee; M Garrett; M Afghan; A Chu; T J C Wang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Modified Criteria for Radiographic Response Assessment in Glioblastoma Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Patrick Y Wen; Timothy F Cloughesy
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.620

9.  Predictors of Morbidity and Cleavage Plane in Surgical Resection of Pure Convexity Meningiomas Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Sensitive Image Subtraction Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  José Luis Thenier-Villa; Raúl Alejandro Galárraga Campoverde; Adolfo Ramón DE LA Lama Zaragoza; Cesáreo Conde Alonso
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 10.  Pitfalls in the neuroimaging of glioblastoma in the era of antiangiogenic and immuno/targeted therapy - detecting illusive disease, defining response.

Authors:  Raymond Y Huang; Martha R Neagu; David A Reardon; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.