Literature DB >> 10232502

A comparison of the angiotensin II antagonists valsartan and losartan in the treatment of essential hypertension.

T Hedner1, S Oparil, K Rasmussen, A Rapelli, M Gatlin, P Kobi, J Sullivan, P Oddou-Stock.   

Abstract

We compared the angiotensin II receptor antagonist valsartan to losartan as an antihypertensive agent in an 8-week trial. Adults with uncomplicated essential hypertension (baseline seated diastolic blood pressure < 115 mm Hg and > or = 95 mm Hg) were randomized to receive 80 mg valsartan, 50 mg losartan, or placebo once daily. After 4 weeks doses of active medication and placebo were doubled. Seated systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured and the response rate evaluated. Tolerability was assessed by the incidence of adverse events. Both angiotensin II receptor antagonists produced similar significant reductions in mean blood pressures at 4 and 8 weeks compared to placebo. Valsartan produced a significantly higher number of responders (62%) than losartan (55%, P = .02) at the 8 week treatment endpoint. The incidence of adverse experiences (AE) was similar in all three groups, with headache and dizziness reported most often. Valsartan (80/160 mg) monotherapy in this trial was as effective and well tolerated as 50/100 mg losartan in treating mild to moderate essential hypertension, and at 160 mg has a significantly higher responder rate than 100 mg losartan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10232502     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00082-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  14 in total

1.  Angiotensin II receptor blockers.

Authors:  Amy Barreras; Cheryle Gurk-Turner
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-01

2.  A cost-utility analysis of losartan versus atenolol in the treatment of hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Aslam H Anis; Huiying Sun; Sonia Singh; John Woolcott; Bohdan Nosyk; Marc Brisson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The effects of KT3-671, a new angiotensin II (AT 1) receptor blocker in mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  D Patterson; J Webster; G McInnes; A Brady; T MacDonald
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  The role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in elderly patients with hypertension.

Authors:  G Neil Thomas; Paul Chan; Brian Tomlinson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Comparative assessment of angiotensin receptor blockers in different clinical settings.

Authors:  Paolo Verdecchia; Fabio Angeli; Salvatore Repaci; Giovanni Mazzotta; Giorgio Gentile; Gianpaolo Reboldi
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-11-16

Review 6.  Comparison of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  David H G Smith
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Blood pressure outcomes in patients receiving angiotensin II receptor blockers in primary care: a comparative effectiveness analysis from electronic medical record data.

Authors:  C Venkata S Ram; Krishnan Ramaswamy; Chunlin Qian; Joe Biskupiak; Amy Ryan; Ruth Quah; Patricia A Russo
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Effectiveness and safety of valsartan in children aged 6 to 16 years with hypertension.

Authors:  Thomas Wells; Jeffrey Blumer; Kevin E C Meyers; Jose P R Neto; Rejane Meneses; Mieczysław Litwin; Johan Vande Walle; Susan Solar-Yohay; Victor Shi; Guangyang Han
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  Valsartan vs. other angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analytical approach.

Authors:  R M Nixon; E Müller; A Lowy; H Falvey
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Effect of Fimasartan versus Valsartan and Olmesartan on Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Korean Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Three-Parallel Group, Forced Titration, Multicenter, Phase IV Study (Fimasartan Achieving Systolic Blood Pressure Target (FAST) Study).

Authors:  Woo-Baek Chung; Sang-Hyun Ihm; Sung-Won Jang; Sung-Ho Her; Chul Soo Park; Jong-Min Lee; Kiyuk Chang; Doo-Soo Jeon; Ki-Dong Yoo; Ki-Bae Seung
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.