Literature DB >> 10231932

[Ureterorenoscopy (URS) in treatment of ureteral calculi. I. Safety and effectiveness of URS as auxiliary treatment after ESWL].

S Fernandez De la Maza1, J Noldus, H Huland.   

Abstract

We were interested in the effectivity and morbidity of URS as an auxiliary treatment in patients who underwent ESWL for ureteral (n = 71) and kidney stones (n = 31). Between 1991 and 1995, 102 URS were performed for treatment of ureteral fragments. 28 (27.5%) were located in the proximal, 24 (23.5%) in the middle and 50 (49%) in the distal ureter. In 25 cases, fragments were found as "Steinstrasse". In the same period of time, 2554 patients with ureteral stones were treated with ESWL alone, therefore the overall rate of URS was low (4%). URS alone had a stonefree success rate of 58.9%. The success rate depended on the location of the ureteral stone: proximal 25%, middle 50% and distal 82%. URS combined with ESWL showed an overall success rate of 97.9%. Finally, only 2 patients (2.1%) required an open surgery. 29.3% of the stones were treated by extraction only. The extraction of stone was the most frequent procedure to remove the fragments after ESWL. The rate of complications were 6.9%. None of the patients suffered from late complications like stricture of the ureter. The URS for the treatment of stone fragments after ESWL has been shown to be an effective and safe procedure with a low rate of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10231932     DOI: 10.1007/s001200050255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  6 in total

1.  Ureteroscopy in proximal ureteral stones after shock wave lithotripsy failure: Is it safe and efficient or dangerous?

Authors:  Muhammet Fatih Kilinc; Omer Gokhan Doluoglu; Tolga Karakan; Ayhan Dalkilic; Nurettin Cem Sonmez; Yasin Aydogmus; Berkan Resorlu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Does previous failed ESWL have a negative impact of on the outcome of ureterorenoscopy? A matched pair analysis.

Authors:  Prodromos Philippou; David Payne; Kim Davenport; Anthony G Timoney; Francis X Keeley
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  [Influence of ureter stenting before ureterorenoscopic treatment of ureteral calculi].

Authors:  J Mueller; N Riechert-Mühe; A J Schrader; A Leitenberger; J Steinestel; M A Kuczyk; S Steffens; R Hofmann; J Sotelino
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Impact of previous SWL on ureterorenoscopy outcomes and optimal timing for ureterorenoscopy after SWL failure in proximal ureteral stones.

Authors:  Bora Irer; Mehmet Oguz Sahin; Oguzcan Erbatu; Alperen Yildiz; Sakir Ongun; Onder Cinar; Ahmet Cihan; Mehmet Sahin; Volkan Sen; Oktay Ucer; Fuat Kizilay; Ozan Bozkurt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Does stone dimension affect the effectiveness of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in distal ureteral stones?

Authors:  Volkan Tuğcu; Ali Ihsan Taşci; Emin Ozbek; Bekir Aras; Levent Verim; Levent Gürkan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm.

Authors:  Feng Yao; XiaoLiang Jiang; Bin Xie; Ning Liu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 2.264

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.