Literature DB >> 10231489

Starvation-induced Mucts62-mediated coding sequence fusion: a role for ClpXP, Lon, RpoS and Crp.

S Lamrani1, C Ranquet, M J Gama, H Nakai, J A Shapiro, A Toussaint, G Maenhaut-Michel.   

Abstract

The formation of araB-lacZ coding sequence fusions in Escherichia coli is a particular type of chromosomal rearrangement induced by Mucts62, a thermoinducible mutant of mutator phage Mu. Fusion formation is controlled by the host physiology. It only occurs after aerobic carbon starvation and requires the phage-encoded transposase pA, suggesting that these growth conditions trigger induction of the Mucts62 prophage. Here, we show that thermal induction of the prophage accelerated araB-lacZ fusion formation, confirming that derepression is a rate-limiting step in the fusion process. Nonetheless, starvation conditions remained essential to complete fusions, suggesting additional levels of physiological regulation. Using a transcriptional fusion indicator system in which the Mu early lytic promoter is fused to the reporter E. coli lacZ gene, we confirmed that the Mucts62 prophage was derepressed in stationary phase (S derepression) at low temperature. S derepression did not apply to prophages that expressed the Mu wild-type repressor. It depended upon the host ClpXP and Lon ATP-dependent proteases and the RpoS stationary phase-specific sigma factor, but not upon Crp. None of these four functions was required for thermal induction. Crp was required for fusion formation, but only when the Mucts62 prophage encoded the transposition/replication activating protein pB. Finally, we found that thermally induced cultures did not return to the repressed state when shifted back to low temperature and, hence, remained activated for accelerated fusion formation upon starvation. The maintenance of the derepressed state required the ClpXP and Lon host proteases and the prophage Ner-regulatory protein. These observations illustrate how the cts62 mutation in Mu repressor provides the prophage with a new way to respond to growth phase-specific regulatory signals and endows the host cell with a new potential for adaptation through the controlled use of the phage transposition machinery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10231489     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01352.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Microbiol        ISSN: 0950-382X            Impact factor:   3.501


  26 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of stationary phase mutation: a decade of adaptive mutation.

Authors:  P L Foster
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Stationary-phase mutation in the bacterial chromosome: recombination protein and DNA polymerase IV dependence.

Authors:  H J Bull; M J Lombardo; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The tRNA function of SsrA contributes to controlling repression of bacteriophage Mu prophage.

Authors:  C Ranquet; J Geiselmann; A Toussaint
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Involvement of sigma(S) in starvation-induced transposition of Pseudomonas putida transposon Tn4652.

Authors:  H Ilves; R Hõrak; M Kivisaar
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Extremely low frequency magnetic fields affect transposition activity in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  B Del Re; F Garoia; P Mesirca; C Agostini; F Bersani; G Giorgi
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  General stress response regulator RpoS in adaptive mutation and amplification in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Mary-Jane Lombardo; Ildiko Aponyi; Susan M Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Stress-induced mutagenesis in bacteria.

Authors:  Patricia L Foster
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.250

8.  Activation of a dormant ClpX recognition motif of bacteriophage Mu repressor by inducing high local flexibility.

Authors:  Kimberly R Marshall-Batty; Hiroshi Nakai
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  sigmaB regulates IS256-mediated Staphylococcus aureus biofilm phenotypic variation.

Authors:  Jaione Valle; Marta Vergara-Irigaray; Nekane Merino; José R Penadés; Iñigo Lasa
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Stress-Induced Mutagenesis: Implications in Cancer and Drug Resistance.

Authors:  Devon M Fitzgerald; P J Hastings; Susan M Rosenberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.