Literature DB >> 10231399

Observer agreement on the grading of gastric atrophy.

G J Offerhaus1, A B Price, J Haot, F J ten Kate, P Sipponen, R Fiocca, M Stolte, M F Dixon.   

Abstract

AIMS: Assessment of lesser or doubtful degrees of gastric atrophy can be difficult, especially in the antrum, since well established criteria are lacking. At the Houston Working Party on Gastritis in 1994 a visual analogue scale was designed for the grading of histopathological parameters. This was done to promote uniformity in grading by acting as a reference. The purpose of the present study was to measure interobserver variation between pathologists familiar with the Houston visual analogue scale in a specifically selected set of biopsies from patients with lesser or doubtful degrees of atrophy. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Thirty cases with biopsies of the antrum and corpus from a long-term follow-up study on Helicobacter pylori gastritis comprised the current study material. The cases were selected from that study because there had been uncertainty or disagreement on the presence of gastric atrophy. The study set of haematoxylin and eosin (H & E) slides was circulated amongst gastrointestinal pathologists familiar with the visual analogue scale who were unaware of the source of the study set nor had any other clinical information. Interobserver variability was analysed using kappa statistics. The overall agreement for the grade of atrophy in antral biopsies was 0.461; the kappa value was 0.18 (95% confidence limits 0.12-0.24), which is considered poor agreement. The kappa value was nevertheless statistically significant (P < 0. 01). The overall agreement on the grade of atrophy in the corpus biopsies was apparently good (0.833), but the kappa which adjusts for chance agreement was only moderate (0.48; 95% confidence limits 0.42-0.55; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The studied series comprised a self-selected sample in which there was doubt about the grade of atrophy and such a sample will produce lower kappa values than a random sample of gastric biopsies. The results nevertheless confirm that better guidelines and firm criteria are needed to properly diagnose and grade gastric atrophy. It is suggested that the use of two grades, low- and high-grade atrophy, akin to that in use for grading inflammatory bowel disorder (IBD)- associated dysplasia, could improve agreement. Furthermore optimal biopsy quality with full thickness mucosa and proper orientation appears important for grading gastric atrophy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10231399     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1999.00635.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  9 in total

1.  Supra-angular biopsy is more reliable for atrophy recognization: analysis of 1598 cases for gastric mucosal histological examination.

Authors:  Ya-Li Zhang; Zhuo-Sheng Lai; Dian-Yuan Zhou; Nobutaka Yamada; Min Wen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Endoscopic biopsies.

Authors:  R Fiocca; P Ceppa
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Atrophic gastritis: pathology and endoscopy in the reversibility assessment.

Authors:  M Rugge; M Cassaro; G Pennelli; G Leandro; F Di Mario; F Farinati
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Refinement and reproducibility of histologic criteria for the assessment of microscopic lesions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: the Esohisto Project.

Authors:  Lisa Yerian; Roberto Fiocca; Luca Mastracci; Robert Riddell; Michael Vieth; Prateek Sharma; Stefan Franzen; Paula Fernstrom; Magnus Ruth
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Identifying the pre-malignant stomach: from guidelines to practice.

Authors:  Jonathan R White; Matthew Banks
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-25

6.  The validity of a biomarker method for indirect detection of gastric mucosal atrophy versus standard histopathology.

Authors:  Marcis Leja; Limas Kupcinskas; Konrads Funka; Agnese Sudraba; Laimas Jonaitis; Audrius Ivanauskas; Dainius Janciauskas; Gediminas Kiudelis; Han-Mo Chiu; Jaw-Town Lin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Gastritis staging: interobserver agreement by applying OLGA and OLGIM systems.

Authors:  Sergejs Isajevs; Inta Liepniece-Karele; Dainius Janciauskas; Georgijs Moisejevs; Viesturs Putnins; Konrads Funka; Ilze Kikuste; Aigars Vanags; Ivars Tolmanis; Marcis Leja
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Epidemiological trends of pre-malignant gastric lesions: a long-term nationwide study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  A C de Vries; G A Meijer; C W N Looman; M K Casparie; B E Hansen; N C T van Grieken; E J Kuipers
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Prevalence and risk factors of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia: a nationwide multicenter prospective study in Korea.

Authors:  Young-Eun Joo; Hyun-Kyung Park; Dae-Seong Myung; Gwang-Ho Baik; Jeong-Eun Shin; Geom-Seog Seo; Gwang Ha Kim; Heung Up Kim; Hyun Young Kim; Sung-Il Cho; Nayoung Kim
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.519

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.