Literature DB >> 10231099

Incidence of acromioclavicular joint complications after arthroscopic subacromial decompression.

B W Fischer1, R M Gross, J A McCarthy, J S Arroyo.   

Abstract

We performed a chart and radiograph review of 173 patients (183 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic subacromial decompression between 1991 and 1994 and had preoperative and postoperative radiographs. The study focused on the presence of preoperative acromioclavicular joint pathology, intraoperative violation of the acromioclavicular joint, extent of distal clavicle excision, and subsequent development of acromioclavicular joint symptoms. The 183 surgical procedures were divided into three groups: shoulders with subacromial decompression without acromioclavicular joint violation (103 of 183; 56%; group A); shoulders with subacromial decompression with acromioclavicular joint violation and partial distal clavicle resection (36 of 183; 20%; group B); and shoulders with subacromial decompression with complete distal clavicle resection (44 of 183; 24%; group C). Groups A and C had no postoperative sequelae in reference to the acromioclavicular joint. In contrast, 14 of the 36 shoulders (39%) in group B with a documented acromioclavicular joint violation and a partial distal clavicle resection developed acromioclavicular joint symptoms at an average of 8.4 months (range, 1.8 to 19 months) after surgery. This finding was statistically significant (P=.0001). The results of this study suggest that any violation of the acromioclavicular joint in the course of an arthroscopic subacromial decompression may jeopardize the result. The degree of violation is not helpful in predicting outcome. As a result of this study, we suggest an all-or-none surgical approach to the acromioclavicular joint and distal clavicle resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10231099     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(99)70028-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  7 in total

1.  Clinical review of patients subjected to mini-Mumford arthroscopy.

Authors:  Carlo Biz; Giovanni Battista Vinanti; Marco Zamperetti; Alberto Rossato; Roberto Aldegheri
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2012-09-10

Review 2.  [Arthroscopic subacromial decompression].

Authors:  S Lerch; S Elki; M Jaeger; T Berndt
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Does Distal Clavicle Resection Decrease Pain or Improve Shoulder Function in Patients With Acromioclavicular Joint Arthritis and Rotator Cuff Tears? A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Jian-Xiong Ma; Shao-Wen Zhu; Hao-Bo Jia; Xin-Long Ma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Is routine distal clavicle resection necessary in rotator cuff repair surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ann Livingstone; Rafik Asaid; Afshin Kamali Moaveni
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-11-06

5.  Preoperative Factors Associated With Subsequent Distal Clavicle Resection After Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Erin Granger; Hunter Ross; Robert T Burks; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-05-02

6.  EVALUATION OF ANATOMICAL INTEGRITY USING ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION, AND FUNCTIONAL INTEGRITY USING THE CONSTANT & MURLEY SCORE, OF THE ROTATOR CUFF FOLLOWING ARTHROSCOPIC REPAIR.

Authors:  Glaydson Gomes Godinho; Flavio de Oliveira França; Freitas José Marcio Alves; Fábio Nagato Watanabe; Leonardo Oliveira Nobre; Manoel Augusto De Almeida Neto; Marcos André Mendes Da Silva
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16

7.  Bipolar Acromioclavicular Joint Resection.

Authors:  Julien Gaillard; Michel Calò; Geoffroy Nourissat
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-11-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.