Literature DB >> 10231075

The relationship between health-state utilities and the SF-12 in a general population.

L Lundberg1, M Johannesson, D G Isacson, L Borgquist.   

Abstract

It would be a major advance if quality-of-life instruments could be translated into health-state utilities. The aim with this study was to investigate the relationship between the SF-12 and health-state utilities, based on responses to a postal questionnaire sent to a random sample of 8,000 inhabitants, aged 20-84 years, in the general population. The questionnaire included the SF-12, a rating-scale (RS) question, and a time-tradeoff (TTO) question; the response rate was 68%. Age, gender, and the 12 items of the SF-12 were used as explanatory variables in a linear regression analysis of the health-state utilities. The regression models explained about 50% of the variance in the RS answers and about 25% of the variance in the TTO answers. Most of the SF-12 items were related to the health-state utilities in the expected ways, with especially strong results for the RS method. The results suggest that the SF-12 can be converted to health-state utilities, but that further work is needed to reliably estimate the conversion function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10231075     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9901900203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  31 in total

1.  Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D.

Authors:  K Burström; M Johannesson; F Diderichsen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Using the effect size to model change in preference values from descriptive health status.

Authors:  Kristy Sanderson; Gavin Andrews; Justine Corry; Helen Lapsley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Estimating utilities for chronic kidney disease, using SF-36 and SF-12-based measures: challenges in a population of veterans with diabetes.

Authors:  Mangala Rajan; Kuan-Chi Lai; Chin-Lin Tseng; Shirley Qian; Alfredo Selim; Lewis Kazis; Leonard Pogach; Anushua Sinha
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Measuring preferences for cost-utility analysis: how choice of method may influence decision-making.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Estimating utility values for health states of overweight and obese individuals using the SF-36.

Authors:  Michael A Kortt; Philip M Clarke
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Separating gains and losses in health when calculating the minimum important difference for mapped utility measures.

Authors:  Michael B Nichol; Joshua D Epstein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Deriving utility scores from the SF-36 health instrument using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Graeme Hawthorne; Konstancja Densley; Julie F Pallant; Duncan Mortimer; Leonie Segal
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of an Early Detection of Parkinson's Disease through Innovative Technology.

Authors:  David A Munoz; Mehmet Serdar Kilinc; Harriet B Nembhard; Conrad Tucker; Xuemei Huang
Journal:  Eng Econ       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 0.861

9.  Predicting EQ-5D-US and SF-6D societal health state values from the Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire.

Authors:  C M McDonough; M R Grove; A D Elledge; A N A Tosteson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Quality-of-life loss of people admitted to burn centers, United States.

Authors:  Ted Miller; Soma Bhattacharya; William Zamula; Dennis Lezotte; Karen Kowalske; David Herndon; James Fauerbach; Loren Engrav
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.