OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gonadotropin stimulation influences the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in cervical scrapes. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study. SETTING: Tertiary care infertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Two hundred ninety-four patients enrolled in an IVF or IUI program. Two thousand two hundred sixty-two women from an ongoing screening study who were of similar age served as a control group. INTERVENTION(S): Cervical scrapes were obtained with a cytobrush before and after ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Human papillomavirus status was assessed with a general primer (GP) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the GP5+/GP6+ system. In GP-PCR-positive samples, high-risk HPV types were identified with a cocktail of digoxigenin-labeled oligonucleotides. Viral load was evaluated by semiquantitative analysis of the PCR products. RESULT(S): The prevalence of high-risk HPVs was 7.8% before stimulation and 6.8% after stimulation and, thus, was similar to the prevalence in controls (8.4%). Twenty-nine patients were positive for high-risk HPVs: 14 were positive before and after stimulation, 6 were negative before and positive after stimulation, and 9 were positive before and negative after stimulation. Positivity for high-risk HPVs and viral load did not correlate directly with serum estrogen levels. CONCLUSION(S): Ovarian stimulation has no significant effect on the prevalence of HPV DNA in cervical scrapes obtained from patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gonadotropin stimulation influences the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in cervical scrapes. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study. SETTING: Tertiary care infertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Two hundred ninety-four patients enrolled in an IVF or IUI program. Two thousand two hundred sixty-two women from an ongoing screening study who were of similar age served as a control group. INTERVENTION(S): Cervical scrapes were obtained with a cytobrush before and after ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Human papillomavirus status was assessed with a general primer (GP) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the GP5+/GP6+ system. In GP-PCR-positive samples, high-risk HPV types were identified with a cocktail of digoxigenin-labeled oligonucleotides. Viral load was evaluated by semiquantitative analysis of the PCR products. RESULT(S): The prevalence of high-risk HPVs was 7.8% before stimulation and 6.8% after stimulation and, thus, was similar to the prevalence in controls (8.4%). Twenty-nine patients were positive for high-risk HPVs: 14 were positive before and after stimulation, 6 were negative before and positive after stimulation, and 9 were positive before and negative after stimulation. Positivity for high-risk HPVs and viral load did not correlate directly with serum estrogen levels. CONCLUSION(S): Ovarian stimulation has no significant effect on the prevalence of HPV DNA in cervical scrapes obtained from patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques.
Authors: Hana Jaworek; Blazena Zborilova; Vladimira Koudelakova; Jana Brezinova; Jana Vrbkova; Ivana Oborna; Marian Hajduch Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X Date: 2019-07-04
Authors: M A P C van Ham; W J G Melchers; A G J M Hanselaar; R L M Bekkers; H Boonstra; L F A G Massuger Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2002-08-12 Impact factor: 7.640