M Di Leo1, G Weisz, N Ansaldi Balocco. 1. Department of Pediatrics and Adolescence Sciences Chair of Pediatrics, University of Turin, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antiendomysium antibodies (EMA) detection in serum is the best screening test for coeliac disease (CD): in saliva it has not yet been assayed. Aims of this study are: to verify the presence of EMA in saliva collected with a not invasive technique; to evaluate the validity of serum and salivary EMA in CD screening. METHODS: We investigated 130 subjects divided into 3 groups: "A": 45 untreated CD patients (mean age 6.11); "B": 18 CD patients treated with a gluten free diet (mean age 13.2); "C": 67 controls (mean age 8.9). We performed the EMA test using the indirect immunofluorescence technique, in serum and in saliva concentrated samples. RESULTS: Our results show: sensitivity EMA serum 100%; specificity EMA serum 96.5%; sensitivity EMA saliva 46.5%; specificity EMA saliva 100%; pos. pred. value EMA serum 93.5%; neg. pred. value serum 100%; pos. pred. value EMA saliva 100%; neg. pred. value saliva 78.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusion indicates a high specificity of salivary EMA and a high sensitivity of serum EMA, anyway biopsy is still recommended for diagnosis of CD.
BACKGROUND: Antiendomysium antibodies (EMA) detection in serum is the best screening test for coeliac disease (CD): in saliva it has not yet been assayed. Aims of this study are: to verify the presence of EMA in saliva collected with a not invasive technique; to evaluate the validity of serum and salivary EMA in CD screening. METHODS: We investigated 130 subjects divided into 3 groups: "A": 45 untreated CDpatients (mean age 6.11); "B": 18 CDpatients treated with a gluten free diet (mean age 13.2); "C": 67 controls (mean age 8.9). We performed the EMA test using the indirect immunofluorescence technique, in serum and in saliva concentrated samples. RESULTS: Our results show: sensitivity EMA serum 100%; specificity EMA serum 96.5%; sensitivity EMA saliva 46.5%; specificity EMA saliva 100%; pos. pred. value EMA serum 93.5%; neg. pred. value serum 100%; pos. pred. value EMA saliva 100%; neg. pred. value saliva 78.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusion indicates a high specificity of salivary EMA and a high sensitivity of serum EMA, anyway biopsy is still recommended for diagnosis of CD.