Literature DB >> 10229468

Radiologic gastrojejunostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a prospective, randomized comparison.

E K Hoffer1, J M Cosgrove, D Q Levin, M M Herskowitz, S J Sclafani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of radiologic guided placement of percutaneous gastrojejunostomy (PGJ) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to PGJ (n = 66) or PEG (n = 69). Indications for gastrostomy were need for prolonged enteral nutrition (97%) or gastrointestinal decompression (3%), with etiologies of neurologic impairment (81%), head and neck neoplasm (12%), bowel obstruction (3%), or other (4%). Mean follow-up was 202 days and 30-day follow-up was obtained for 85% of patients.
RESULTS: PEG was successful in 63 of 69 (91%) patients, while PGJ established access in all of 66 attempts (100%) (P = .014). Average procedural time was 53 minutes for PGJ and 24 minutes for PEG (P = .001). At 30-day follow-up, there were 33 and 45 complications in the PGJ and PEG groups, respectively. This difference was due to the greater incidence of pneumonia in the PEG group (P = .013). Long-term tube-related complications occurred with 17 PGJs and four PEGs (P = .007). The PGJ cost more than PEG, but this advantage was offset by the cost of complications.
CONCLUSION: PGJ had higher success rate and fewer complications, due to a lower incidence of pneumonia. PEG took less time to perform, cost less, and required less tube maintenance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10229468     DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(99)70058-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  12 in total

Review 1.  Enteral nutrition and acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Q P Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus percutaneous radiological gastrostomy for swallowing disturbances.

Authors:  Yong Yuan; Yongfan Zhao; Tianpeng Xie; Yang Hu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-03

Review 3.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a safe and effective bridge for enteral nutrition in neurological or non-neurological conditions.

Authors:  Rasim Gencosmanoglu
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy.

Authors:  Stuart M Lyon; Diane M Pascoe
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Updates on percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy and jejunostomy.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Shin; Auh-Whan Park
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 4.519

Review 6.  Decompressive percutaneous gastrostomy tube use in gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Larissa Meyer; Bhavana Pothuri
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2006-03

7.  Thirty-day mortality after percutaneous gastrostomy by endoscopic versus radiologic placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joo Hyun Lim; Seung Ho Choi; Changhyun Lee; Ji Yeon Seo; Hae Yeon Kang; Jong In Yang; Su Jin Chung; Joo Sung Kim
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2016-10-17

8.  Gastrostomy Tube Placement by Radiological Methods for Older Patients Requiring Enteral Nutrition: Not to be Forgotten.

Authors:  Vered Hermush; Yitshal Berner; Yael Katz; Yanina Kunin; Irena Krasniansky; Yael Schwartz; Debbie Mimran Nahon; Ana Elizariev; Gad Mendelson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-09-26

Review 9.  Percutaneous endoscopic versus surgical gastrostomy in patients with benign and malignant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  José Gonçalves Pereira Bravo; Edson Ide; Andre Kondo; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Paulo Sakai; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Surgical jejunostomy and radiological gastro-jejunostomy tube feeding in children: risks, benefits and nutritional outcomes.

Authors:  Rashmi R Singh; Simon Eaton; Derek J Roebuck; Alex M Barnacle; Samantha Chippington; Kate M K Cross; Paolo De Coppi; Joe I Curry
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.