Literature DB >> 10228585

The effects of radiofrequency fields on cell proliferation are non-thermal.

S Velizarov1, P Raskmark, S Kwee.   

Abstract

The number of reports on the effects induced by radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields and microwave (MW) radiation in various cellular systems is still increasing. Until now no satisfactory mechanism has been proposed to explain the biological effects of these fields. One of the current theories is that heat generation by RF/MW is the cause, in spite of the fact that a great number of studies under isothermal conditions have reported significant cellular changes after exposure to RF/MW. Therefore, this study was undertaken to investigate which effect MW radiation from these fields in combination with a significant change of temperature could have on cell proliferation. The experiments were performed on the same cell line, and with the same exposure system as in a previous work [S. Kwee, P. Raskmark, Changes in cell proliferation due to environmental non-ionizing radiation: 2. Microwave radiation, Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg., 44 (1998), pp. 251-255]. The field was generated by signal simulation of the Global System for Mobile communications (GSM) of 960 MHz. Cell cultures, growing in microtiter plates, were exposed in a specially constructed chamber, a Transverse Electromagnetic (TEM) cell. The Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) value for each cell well was calculated for this exposure system. However, in this study the cells were exposed to the field at a higher or lower temperature than the temperature in the field-free incubator i.e., the temperature in the TEM cell was either 39 or 35 +/- 0.1 degrees C. The corresponding sham experiments were performed under exactly the same experimental conditions. The results showed that there was a significant change in cell proliferation in the exposed cells in comparison to the non-exposed (control) cells at both temperatures. On the other hand, no significant change in proliferation rate was found in the sham-exposed cells at both temperatures. This shows that biological effects due to RF/MW cannot be attributed only to a change of temperature. Since the RF/MW induced changes were of the same order of magnitude at both temperatures and also comparable to our previous results under isothermal conditions at 37 degrees C, cellular stress caused by electromagnetic fields could initiate the changes in cell cycle reaction rates. It is widely accepted that certain classes of heat-shock proteins are involved in these stress reactions.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10228585     DOI: 10.1016/s0302-4598(98)00238-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectrochem Bioenerg        ISSN: 0302-4598


  15 in total

1.  Thermal and nonthermal effects of discontinuous microwave exposure (2.45 gigahertz) on the cell membrane of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Carole Rougier; Audrey Prorot; Philippe Chazal; Philippe Leveque; Patrick Leprat
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  ROS release and Hsp70 expression after exposure to 1,800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in primary human monocytes and lymphocytes.

Authors:  M Lantow; M Lupke; J Frahm; M O Mattsson; N Kuster; M Simko
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Exposure to mobile phone radiations at 2350 MHz incites cyto- and genotoxic effects in root meristems of Allium cepa.

Authors:  Shikha Chandel; Shalinder Kaur; Mohd Issa; Harminder Pal Singh; Daizy Rani Batish; Ravinder Kumar Kohli
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2019-01-05

4.  Exposure to 1950-MHz TD-SCDMA electromagnetic fields affects the apoptosis of astrocytes via caspase-3-dependent pathway.

Authors:  Yu-xiao Liu; Jun-li Tai; Guo-qing Li; Zhi-wen Zhang; Jing-hui Xue; Hong-sheng Liu; Heng Zhu; Ji-de Cheng; Yuan-Ling Liu; An-ming Li; Yi Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of pulsed 2.856 GHz microwave exposure on BM-MSCs isolated from C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Changzhen Wang; Xiaoyan Wang; Hongmei Zhou; Guofu Dong; Xue Guan; Lifeng Wang; Xinping Xu; Shuiming Wang; Peng Chen; Ruiyun Peng; Xiangjun Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Induced mitogenic activity in AML-12 mouse hepatocytes exposed to low-dose ultra-wideband electromagnetic radiation.

Authors:  W C Dorsey; B D Ford; L Roane; D T Haynie; P B Tchounwou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Diverse radiofrequency sensitivity and radiofrequency effects of mobile or cordless phone near fields exposure in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Styliani Geronikolou; Stelios Zimeras; Constantinos H Davos; Ioannis Michalopoulos; Stephanos Tsitomeneas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of biological effects of modulated electro-hyperthermia and conventional heat treatment in human lymphoma U937 cells.

Authors:  G Andocs; M U Rehman; Q-L Zhao; Y Tabuchi; M Kanamori; T Kondo
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2016-06-13

9.  Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimetric quantity for electromagnetic fields bioeffects.

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Olle Johansson; George L Carlo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Anthropogenic Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Elicit Neuropathic Pain in an Amputation Model.

Authors:  Bryan Black; Rafael Granja-Vazquez; Benjamin R Johnston; Erick Jones; Mario Romero-Ortega
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.