Literature DB >> 10227955

Insertion, efficacy, and removal of a nonendoscopically removable percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube.

O W Cass1, K Rowland, B Bartram, J R Ross, Y Choe, J D Hall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Externally removable PEG tubes require an internal bumper that can collapse to a size that is small enough to allow for its removal through the abdominal wall by external traction. Adequate force must be maintained to avoid accidental dislodgement of the tube prior to its desired removal.
METHODS: A nonendoscopically removable PEG (Inverta-PEG, Ross Products Division, Abbott Laboratories, Columbus, OH, USA) was evaluated in a nonmasked, prospective clinical study involving 131 patients enrolled by 25 physicians. The over-the-wire (Sacks-Vine) technique was used for all placements. After insertion, patients were followed weekly for 8 weeks. During week 9, the PEGs were removed percutaneously (nonendoscopically). Insertion, efficacy, and removal performance were evaluated.
RESULTS: Complication rate during insertion was 1.5% and removal was 1.2%. Qualitatively, investigators rated ease of insertion and removal as very easy, easy, average, difficult, or very difficult. Investigators rated 98.5% of insertions as very easy, easy, or average; 95.4% of removals were rated as very easy, easy, or average. Some patients exited the study prematurely due to leakage around the stoma (2.3%) and inadvertent tube removal (5.3%). These complication rates were consistent with earlier reports of other PEG studies.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that Inverta-PEG is a safe and effective tube that can be removed nonendoscopically with ease in 95% of the cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10227955     DOI: 10.1007/s004649901025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  6 in total

1.  Small bowel perforation after incomplete removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy catheter.

Authors:  A Lattuneddu; P Morgagni; G Benati; S Delvecchio; D Garcea
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) with T-fasteners obviates the need for emergent replacement after early tube dislodgement.

Authors:  P Timratana; K El-Hayek; H Shimizu; M Kroh; B Chand
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Reducing Accidental Dislodgement of the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: A Prospective Trial of the "SafetyBreak" Device.

Authors:  Laura H Rosenberger; Christopher A Guidry; John P Davis; Tjasa Hranjec; Vonda K Johnston; Nolan A Wages; Christopher M Watson; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Late accidental dislodgement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube: an underestimated burden on patients and the health care system.

Authors:  Laura H Rosenberger; Timothy Newhook; Bruce Schirmer; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A prospective analysis of 3525 esophagogastroduodenoscopies performed by surgeons.

Authors:  W P Reed; J W Kilkenny; C E Dias; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of complications between endoscopic and percutaneous replacement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes.

Authors:  Chang Geun Lee; Hyoun Woo Kang; Yun Jeong Lim; Jun Kyu Lee; Moon-Soo Koh; Jin Ho Lee; Chang Hun Yang; Jae Hak Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.153

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.