Literature DB >> 10227926

Artificial nutritional support in patients with gastrointestinal fistulas.

S J Dudrick1, A R Maharaj, A A McKelvey.   

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) fistulas allow abnormal diversions of GI contents, digestive juices, water, electrolytes, and nutrients from one hollow viscus to another or to the skin, potentially precipitating a wide variety of pathophysiologic effects. Mortality rates have decreased significantly during the past few decades from as high as 40% to 65% to 5.3% to 21.3% largely as a result of advances in intensive care, nutritional support, antimicrobial therapy, wound care, and operative techniques. The primary causes of death secondary to enterocutaneous fistulas have been, and continue to be, malnutrition, electrolyte imbalances, and sepsis, especially in high-output fistulas, which continue to have a mortality rate of about 35%. Priorities in the management of GI fistulas include restoration of blood volume and correction of fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base imbalances; control of infection and sepsis with appropriate antibiotics and drainage of abscesses; initiation of GI tract rest including secretory inhibition and nasogastric suction; control and collection of fistula drainage with protection of the surrounding skin; and provision of optimal nutrition by total parenteral nutrition (TPN) or enteral nutrition (EN) (or both). The role of nutrition support in the management of enterocutaneous fistulas as either TPN or EN is primarily one of supportive care to prevent malnutrition, thereby obviating further deterioration of an already debilitated patient. It has been shown in several studies that TPN has substantially improved the prognosis of GI fistula patients by increasing the rate of spontaneous closure and improving the nutritional status of patients requiring repeat operations. Moreover, other studies have shown that nutritional support decreases or modifies the composition of the GI tract secretions and is thus considered to have a primary therapeutic role in the management of fistula patients. Finally, if a fistula has not closed within 30 to 40 days, or if it is unlikely to close because of a variety of collateral or compounding pathophysiologic conditions, consideration must be given to operative resection of the fistula while continuing to maintain the previous nutritional and metabolic support. The morbidity and mortality rates in such unfortunate patients remain high despite the many recent advances in surgical and metabolic technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10227926     DOI: 10.1007/pl00012349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  36 in total

1.  Sequential changes of body composition in patients with enterocutaneous fistula during the 10 days after admission.

Authors:  Xin-Bo Wang; Jian-An Ren; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  A laparoscopic approach to the surgical management of enterocutaneous fistula in a wound healing by secondary intention.

Authors:  G D Garcia; I H G Freeman; S M Zagorski; M H Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Role of Percutaneous Glue Treatment After Persisting Leak After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Ramon Vilallonga; Jacques Himpens; Barbara Bosch; Simon van de Vrande; Johan Bafort
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Enterocutaneous fistulas: an overview.

Authors:  J F Whelan; R R Ivatury
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Factors predictive of recurrence and mortality after surgical repair of enterocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  Jose L Martinez; Enrique Luque-de-León; Guillermo Ballinas-Oseguera; José D Mendez; Marco A Juárez-Oropeza; Ruben Román-Ramos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  [Late complications of open abdomen].

Authors:  F Eder; J Tautenhahn; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Biliogastric diversion for the management of high-output duodenal fistula: report of two cases and literature review.

Authors:  Konstantinos Milias; Nikolaos Deligiannidis; Theodossis S Papavramidis; Konstantinos Ioannidis; Nikolaos Xiros; Spiros Papavramidis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Metabolic support of the enterocutaneous fistula patient.

Authors:  Joshua I S Bleier; Traci Hedrick
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-09

9.  The use of negative-pressure wound therapy to manage enteroatmospheric fistulae in two patients with large abdominal wounds.

Authors:  John Timmons; Fiona Russell
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  Endoscopic Management of Drain Inclusion in the Gastric Pouch after Gastrojejunal Leakage after Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity (LRYGBP).

Authors:  Ramon Vilallonga; José Manuel Fort; Oscar Gonzalez; Juan Antonio Baena; Albert Lecube; Josè Salord; Manel Armengol Carrasco; Josep Ramon Armengol-Miró
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2010-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.