Literature DB >> 10226923

Prenatal diagnosis and discrimination against the disabled.

L Gillam1.   

Abstract

Two versions of the argument that prenatal diagnosis discriminates against the disabled are distinguished and analysed. Both are shown to be inadequate, but some valid concerns about the social effects of prenatal diagnosis are highlighted.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Philosophical Approach

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10226923      PMCID： PMC479202          DOI： 10.1136/jme.25.2.163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN： 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

Review 1.  Feminist criticism of prenatal diagnosis: a response.

Authors:  D C Wertz; J C Fletcher
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.190
  1 in total
  5 in total

1.  Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people.

Authors:  T S Petersen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  The Perfect Womb: Promoting Equality of (Fetal) Opportunity.

Authors:  Evie Kendal
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 3.  Conceptualizing couples' decision making in PGD: emerging cognitive, emotional, and moral dimensions.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Penny F Pierce
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-01-08

4.  Experiences of Austrian mothers with mobility or sensory impairments during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Barbara Schildberger; Christoph Zenzmaier; Martina König-Bachmann
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  The Unethical Texas Heartbeat Law.

Authors:  Casey Michelle Haining; Louise Anne Keogh; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 3.242
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.