METHODS: The QuietTrak ambulatory blood pressure recorder (Tycos-Welch-Allyn, Arden, North Carolina, USA) was evaluated according to the protocol of the British Hypertension Society (BHS). QuietTrak, a lightweight (355 g), automatic, programmable device, uses an auscultatory measuring system. The protocol of the BHS was composed of subsequent phases with QuietTrak and two observers taking simultaneous measurements on the same arm. RESULTS: No interdevice differences were observed at analysis of variance test either before or after a 1-month period of routine clinical use. The average difference between mercury sphygmomanometer and QuietTrak for systolic and diastolic blood pressures was -0.6+/-3.6 and -0.4+/- 3.6 mmHg before and -0.7+/- 3.3 mmHg and 0.6+/- 3.8 mmHg after the 1-month use. At the main static device validation procedure, performed in 85 subjects, the average difference between observers and QuietTrak was -0.3+/- 3.4 and 0.1+/- 3.5 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Eighty-nine per cent and 99% of systolic and 88% and 98% of diastolic QuietTrak readings were within 5 and 10 mmHg of obsevers, determinations (Class A). In children (n = 33) 87% of systolic and 90% of diastolic QuietTrak readings differed by less than 5 mmHg from the observers' readings (average difference -1.1+/-3.9 and 0.1+/- 3.6 mmHg, respectively). In the elderly (n = 30), 95% and 92% of systolic and diastolic readings were within 5 mmHg of mercury column determinations (average difference -0.8+/-3.2 and -0.2+/-4.5 mmHg). In pregnancy (n = 30), 93% of systolic and 100% of diastolic readings were within 5 mmHg of mercury column determination (average difference -0.3+/-3.4 and 0.1+/- 2.9 mmHg). Device reliability was not affected by posture. Ninety-six per cent and 89% of systolic and diastolic readings differed by less than 5 mmHg from the mercury column determinations in the supine position, 90% and 90% in the standing position, and 88% and 90% in the sitting position. During the treadmill exercise (Bruce protocol), 69% and 88% of systolic and 56% and 83% of diastolic QuietTrak readings differed by less than 5 and 10 mmHg from the observers' measurements. CONCLUSION: The QuietTrak achieved A rating for systolic blood pressure and A rating for diastolic blood pressure according to the criteria of the BHS protocol. The device was acceptable to patients because of its small size, light weight and noiseless performance.
METHODS: The QuietTrak ambulatory blood pressure recorder (Tycos-Welch-Allyn, Arden, North Carolina, USA) was evaluated according to the protocol of the British Hypertension Society (BHS). QuietTrak, a lightweight (355 g), automatic, programmable device, uses an auscultatory measuring system. The protocol of the BHS was composed of subsequent phases with QuietTrak and two observers taking simultaneous measurements on the same arm. RESULTS: No interdevice differences were observed at analysis of variance test either before or after a 1-month period of routine clinical use. The average difference between mercury sphygmomanometer and QuietTrak for systolic and diastolic blood pressures was -0.6+/-3.6 and -0.4+/- 3.6 mmHg before and -0.7+/- 3.3 mmHg and 0.6+/- 3.8 mmHg after the 1-month use. At the main static device validation procedure, performed in 85 subjects, the average difference between observers and QuietTrak was -0.3+/- 3.4 and 0.1+/- 3.5 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Eighty-nine per cent and 99% of systolic and 88% and 98% of diastolic QuietTrak readings were within 5 and 10 mmHg of obsevers, determinations (Class A). In children (n = 33) 87% of systolic and 90% of diastolic QuietTrak readings differed by less than 5 mmHg from the observers' readings (average difference -1.1+/-3.9 and 0.1+/- 3.6 mmHg, respectively). In the elderly (n = 30), 95% and 92% of systolic and diastolic readings were within 5 mmHg of mercury column determinations (average difference -0.8+/-3.2 and -0.2+/-4.5 mmHg). In pregnancy (n = 30), 93% of systolic and 100% of diastolic readings were within 5 mmHg of mercury column determination (average difference -0.3+/-3.4 and 0.1+/- 2.9 mmHg). Device reliability was not affected by posture. Ninety-six per cent and 89% of systolic and diastolic readings differed by less than 5 mmHg from the mercury column determinations in the supine position, 90% and 90% in the standing position, and 88% and 90% in the sitting position. During the treadmill exercise (Bruce protocol), 69% and 88% of systolic and 56% and 83% of diastolic QuietTrak readings differed by less than 5 and 10 mmHg from the observers' measurements. CONCLUSION: The QuietTrak achieved A rating for systolic blood pressure and A rating for diastolic blood pressure according to the criteria of the BHS protocol. The device was acceptable to patients because of its small size, light weight and noiseless performance.