Literature DB >> 10225800

The effect of bracing on varus gonarthrosis.

A Kirkley1, S Webster-Bogaert, R Litchfield, A Amendola, S MacDonald, R McCalden, P Fowler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare a custom-made valgus-producing functional knee (unloader) brace, a neoprene sleeve, and medical treatment only (control group) with regard to their ability to improve the disease-specific quality of life and the functional status of patients who had osteoarthritis in association with a varus deformity of the knee (varus gonarthrosis).
METHODS: The study design was a prospective, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Patients who had varus gonarthrosis were screened for eligibility. The criteria for exclusion included arthritides other than osteoarthritis; an operation on the knee within the previous six months; symptomatic disease of the hip, ankle, or foot; a previous fracture of the tibia or femur; morbid obesity (a body-mass index of more than thirty-five kilograms per square meter); skin disease; peripheral vascular disease or varicose veins that would preclude use of a brace; a severe cardiovascular deficit; blindness; poor English-language skills; and an inability to apply a brace because of physical limitations such as arthritis in the hand or an inability to bend over. Treatment was assigned on the basis of a computer-generated block method of randomization with use of sealed envelopes. The patients were stratified according to age (less than fifty years or at least fifty years), deformity (the mechanical axis in less than 5 degrees of varus or in at least 5 degrees of varus), and the status of the anterior cruciate ligament (torn or intact). The patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: medical treatment only (control group), medical treatment and use of a neoprene sleeve, or medical treatment and use of an unloader brace. The disease-specific quality of life was measured with use of the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the McMaster-Toronto Arthritis Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire (MACTAR), and function was assessed with use of the six-minute walking and thirty-second stair-climbing tests. The primary outcome measure consisted of an analysis of covariance of the change in scores between the baseline and six-month evaluations.
RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients were randomized. The control group consisted of forty patients (thirty-one men and nine women; mean age, 60.9 years); the neoprene-sleeve group, of thirty-eight patients (twenty-seven men and eleven women; mean age, 58.2 years); and the unloader-brace group, of forty-one patients (twenty-eight men and thirteen women; mean age, 59.5 years). Nine patients withdrew from the study. At the six-month follow-up evaluation, there was a significant improvement in the disease-specific quality of life (p = 0.001) and in function (p< or =0.001) in both the neoprene-sleeve group and the unloader-brace group compared with the control group. There was a significant difference between the unloader-brace group and the neoprene-sleeve group with regard to pain after both the six-minute walking test (p = 0.021) and the thirty-second stair-climbing test (p = 0.016). There was a strong trend toward a significant difference between the unloader-brace group and the neoprene-sleeve group with regard to the change in the WOMAC aggregate (p = 0.062) and WOMAC physical function scores (p = 0.081).
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that patients who have varus gonarthrosis may benefit significantly from use of a knee brace in addition to standard medical treatment. The unloader brace was, on the average, more effective than the neoprene sleeve. The ideal candidates for each of these bracing options remain to be identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10225800     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199904000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  55 in total

Review 1.  EULAR Recommendations 2003: an evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT).

Authors:  K M Jordan; N K Arden; M Doherty; B Bannwarth; J W J Bijlsma; P Dieppe; K Gunther; H Hauselmann; G Herrero-Beaumont; P Kaklamanis; S Lohmander; B Leeb; M Lequesne; B Mazieres; E Martin-Mola; K Pavelka; A Pendleton; L Punzi; U Serni; B Swoboda; G Verbruggen; I Zimmerman-Gorska; M Dougados
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  [Conservative treatment of knee osteoarthritis].

Authors:  H Madry; D Kohn
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  David J Hunter; David T Felson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-18

Review 4.  Conservative biomechanical strategies for knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Neil D Reeves; Frank L Bowling
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 20.543

5.  Are joint structure and function related to medial knee OA pain? A pilot study.

Authors:  Rebecca Avrin Zifchock; Yatin Kirane; Howard Hillstrom
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  The biomechanics of osteoarthritis: implications for therapy.

Authors:  Joel A Block; Najia Shakoor
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Mechanical effectiveness of lateral foot wedging in medial knee osteoarthritis after 1 year of wear.

Authors:  Joaquin A Barrios; Robert J Butler; Jeremy R Crenshaw; Todd D Royer; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Valgus bracing in symptomatic varus malalignment for testing the expectable "unloading effect" following valgus high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Philipp Minzlaff; Tim Saier; Peter U Brucker; Bernhard Haller; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan Hinterwimmer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  The benefit of nonpharmacologic therapy to treat symptomatic osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Yvonne C Lee; Robert H Shmerling
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  The effects of electrical stimulation combined with continuous passive motion versus isometric exercise on symptoms, functional capacity, quality of life and balance in knee osteoarthritis: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Fatih Tok; Koray Aydemir; Fatma Peker; Ismail Safaz; Mehmet Ali Taşkaynatan; Ahmet Ozgül
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.631

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.