K S Kohl1, T A Farley, J Ewell, J Scioneaux. 1. Division of Applied Public Health Training, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Louisiana Office of Public Health, New Orleans 70112, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the United States, the recent syphilis epidemic has been followed by the lowest rates in 40 years. Syphilis control in the United States traditionally emphasizes partner notification; however, its role in elimination efforts remains undefined. GOAL OF THE STUDY: To describe and compare outcome measures of partner notification during and after the epidemic. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive analysis of data obtained from interview records of patients with early syphilis in Louisiana during 1993 through 1996. RESULTS: Of 12,927 patients with early syphilis, 3,245 (25%) were identified through partner notification. A total of 7,120 (55%) patients named at least one infected contact. Patients named a mean of 2.3 contacts, resulting in 29,248 named contacts; of these, 22,825 (78%) were examined. A total of 9,374 (41%) of examined contacts were infected, including 18% who were newly identified as infected. No substantial differences were found between epidemic and postepidemic years. CONCLUSION: Partner notification is successful in identifying and treating a large number of infected persons. However, complementary strategies will be needed to eliminate syphilis.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the United States, the recent syphilis epidemic has been followed by the lowest rates in 40 years. Syphilis control in the United States traditionally emphasizes partner notification; however, its role in elimination efforts remains undefined. GOAL OF THE STUDY: To describe and compare outcome measures of partner notification during and after the epidemic. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive analysis of data obtained from interview records of patients with early syphilis in Louisiana during 1993 through 1996. RESULTS: Of 12,927 patients with early syphilis, 3,245 (25%) were identified through partner notification. A total of 7,120 (55%) patients named at least one infected contact. Patients named a mean of 2.3 contacts, resulting in 29,248 named contacts; of these, 22,825 (78%) were examined. A total of 9,374 (41%) of examined contacts were infected, including 18% who were newly identified as infected. No substantial differences were found between epidemic and postepidemic years. CONCLUSION: Partner notification is successful in identifying and treating a large number of infected persons. However, complementary strategies will be needed to eliminate syphilis.
Authors: Lorraine Doherty; Kevin A Fenton; Jane Jones; Thomas C Paine; Stephen P Higgins; Deborah Williams; Adrian Palfreeman Journal: BMJ Date: 2002-07-20
Authors: Thomas A Peterman; Richard H Kahn; Carol A Ciesielski; Elizabeth Ortiz-Rios; Bruce W Furness; Susan Blank; Julia A Schillinger; Robert A Gunn; Melanie Taylor; Stuart M Berman Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Rebecca M Schwartz; Edmond S Malka; Michael Augenbraun; Steven Rubin; Matthew Hogben; Nicole Liddon; William M McCormack; Tracey E Wilson Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Brooke E Hoots; Felicia M T Lewis; Greta Anschuetz; Julia A Schillinger; Susan Blank; Tammy Foskey; Jeffrey A Stover; Thomas A Peterman Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Alberta L Wang; Rui-Rui Peng; Joseph D Tucker; Hrishikesh Chakraborty; Myron S Cohen; Xiang-Sheng Chen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 3.240