Literature DB >> 10224244

Evidence for the involvement of the Glc7-Reg1 phosphatase and the Snf1-Snf4 kinase in the regulation of INO1 transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

M K Shirra1, K M Arndt.   

Abstract

Binding of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) to the promoter is a pivotal step in RNA polymerase II transcription. To identify factors that regulate TBP, we selected for suppressors of a TBP mutant that exhibits promoter-specific defects in activated transcription in vivo and severely reduced affinity for TATA boxes in vitro. Dominant mutations in SNF4 and recessive mutations in REG1, OPI1, and RTF2 were isolated that specifically suppress the inositol auxotrophy of the TBP mutant strains. OPI1 encodes a repressor of INO1 transcription. REG1 and SNF4 encode regulators of the Glc7 phosphatase and Snf1 kinase, respectively, and have well-studied roles in glucose repression. In two-hybrid assays, one SNF4 mutation enhances the interaction between Snf4 and Snf1. Suppression of the TBP mutant by our reg1 and SNF4 mutations appears unrelated to glucose repression, since these mutations do not alleviate repression of SUC2, and glucose levels have little effect on INO1 transcription. Moreover, mutations in TUP1, SSN6, and GLC7, but not HXK2 and MIG1, can cause suppression. Our data suggest that association of TBP with the TATA box may be regulated, directly or indirectly, by a substrate of Snf1. Analysis of INO1 transcription in various mutant strains suggests that this substrate is distinct from Opi1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10224244      PMCID: PMC1460605     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  80 in total

1.  Yeast Gcn5 functions in two multisubunit complexes to acetylate nucleosomal histones: characterization of an Ada complex and the SAGA (Spt/Ada) complex.

Authors:  P A Grant; L Duggan; J Côté; S M Roberts; J E Brownell; R Candau; R Ohba; T Owen-Hughes; C D Allis; F Winston; S L Berger; J L Workman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters.

Authors:  D Kadosh; K Struhl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-05-02       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Transcriptional activation by recruitment.

Authors:  M Ptashne; A Gann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Histone octamer function in vivo: mutations in the dimer-tetramer interfaces disrupt both gene activation and repression.

Authors:  M S Santisteban; G Arents; E N Moudrianakis; M M Smith
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Caprine homologue of rodent 5'-AMP-activated protein kinase subunit and yeast SNF4/CAT3 is down-regulated by thyroid hormone.

Authors:  P A Piosik; M van Groenigen; N J Ponne; L J Valentijn; P A Bolhuis; F Baas
Journal:  Brain Res Mol Brain Res       Date:  1996-09-01

6.  An endomitotic effect of a cell cycle mutation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  D Schild; H N Ananthaswamy; R K Mortimer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Identification of RTF1, a novel gene important for TATA site selection by TATA box-binding protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  L A Stolinski; D M Eisenmann; K M Arndt
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Evidence that Spt3 functionally interacts with Mot1, TFIIA, and TATA-binding protein to confer promoter-specific transcriptional control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  J M Madison; F Winston
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  The NOT, SPT3, and MOT1 genes functionally interact to regulate transcription at core promoters.

Authors:  M A Collart
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Resistance to 2-deoxyglucose in yeast: a direct selection of mutants lacking glucose-phosphorylating enzymes.

Authors:  Z Lobo; P K Maitra
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1977-12-09
View more
  21 in total

1.  Constitutively active AMP kinase mutations cause glycogen storage disease mimicking hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Michael Arad; D Woodrow Benson; Antonio R Perez-Atayde; William J McKenna; Elizabeth A Sparks; Ronald J Kanter; Kate McGarry; J G Seidman; Christine E Seidman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  The REG1 gene product is required for repression of INO1 and other inositol-sensitive upstream activating sequence-containing genes of yeast.

Authors:  Q Ouyang; M Ruiz-Noriega; S A Henry
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Snf1 kinase complexes with different beta subunits display stress-dependent preferences for the three Snf1-activating kinases.

Authors:  Rhonda R McCartney; Eric M Rubenstein; Martin C Schmidt
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 3.886

4.  The Opi1p transcription factor affects expression of FLO11, mat formation, and invasive growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Todd B Reynolds
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2006-08

5.  Histone H3 phosphorylation can promote TBP recruitment through distinct promoter-specific mechanisms.

Authors:  Wan-Sheng Lo; Eric R Gamache; Karl W Henry; David Yang; Lorraine Pillus; Shelley L Berger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  The Snf1 protein kinase and Sit4 protein phosphatase have opposing functions in regulating TATA-binding protein association with the Saccharomyces cerevisiae INO1 promoter.

Authors:  Margaret K Shirra; Sarah E Rogers; Diane E Alexander; Karen M Arndt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Regulation of the yeast INO1 gene. The products of the INO2, INO4 and OPI1 regulatory genes are not required for repression in response to inositol.

Authors:  J A Graves; S A Henry
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Evidence that Spt10 and Spt21 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae play distinct roles in vivo and functionally interact with MCB-binding factor, SCB-binding factor and Snf1.

Authors:  David Hess; Fred Winston
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A chemical genomics study identifies Snf1 as a repressor of GCN4 translation.

Authors:  Margaret K Shirra; Rhonda R McCartney; Chao Zhang; Kevan M Shokat; Martin C Schmidt; Karen M Arndt
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  SNF1/AMPK pathways in yeast.

Authors:  Kristina Hedbacker; Marian Carlson
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2008-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.