Literature DB >> 10223894

Cause of in-hospital death in 12,232 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

D J Malenka1, D O'Rourke, M A Miller, M J Hearne, S Shubrooks, M A Kellett, J F Robb, J R O'Meara, P VerLee, W A Bradley, D Wennberg, T Ryan, P T Vaitkus, B Hettleman, M W Watkins, P D McGrath, G T O'Connor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some deaths after percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PTCA) occur in high-risk situations (eg, shock), whereas others are unexpected and related to procedural complications. To better describe the epidemiologic causes of death after PTCA, we undertook a systematic review of all in-hospital PTCA deaths in Northern New England from 1990 to 1993.
METHODS: The medical records of 121 patients who died during their acute hospitalization for PTCA were reviewed with a standardized data extraction tool to determine a mode of death (eg, low output failure, arrhythmia, respiratory failure) and a circumstance of death (eg, death attributable to a procedural complication, preexisting acute cardiac disease). Any death not classified as a procedural complication was reviewed by a committee and the circumstance of death assigned by a majority rule.
RESULTS: Low-output failure was the most common mode of death occurring in 80 (66.1%) of 121 patients. Other modes of death included ventricular arrhythmias (10.7%), stroke (4.1%), preexisting renal failure (4.1%), bleeding (2.5%), ventricular rupture (2.5%), respiratory failure (2.5%), pulmonary embolism (1.7%), and infection (1.7%). The circumstance of death was a procedural complication in 65 patients (53.7%) and a preexisting acute cardiac condition in 41 patients (33.9%). Women were more likely to die of a procedural complication than were men.
CONCLUSION: Procedural complications account for half of all post-PTCA deaths and are a particular problem for women. Other deaths are more directly related to patient acuity or noncardiac, comorbid conditions. Understanding why women face an increased risk of procedural complications may lead to improved outcomes for all patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10223894     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70215-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  6 in total

1.  Gender differences in coronary artery diameter are not related to body habitus or left ventricular mass.

Authors:  Amit K Hiteshi; Dong Li; Yanlin Gao; Andy Chen; Ferdinand Flores; Song Shou Mao; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  A novel approach to define risk of stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: the DERIVATION score.

Authors:  Davide Capodanno; Piera Capranzano; Rita Bucalo; Alessandra Sanfilippo; Cettina Ruperto; Anna Caggegi; Gianpaolo Ussia; Alfredo Ruggero Galassi; Corrado Tamburino
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Cost-effectiveness of optimal use of acute myocardial infarction treatments and impact on coronary heart disease mortality in China.

Authors:  Miao Wang; Andrew E Moran; Jing Liu; Pamela G Coxson; Paul A Heidenreich; Dongfeng Gu; Jiang He; Lee Goldman; Dong Zhao
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-01-14

4.  Late stent thrombosis associated with heavy exercise.

Authors:  Ziya Simsek; Sakir Arslan; Fuat Gundogdu
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2009

5.  Cerebellar stroke complicating coronary catheterization: a case report.

Authors:  Hamza Chraibi; Zakia El Yousfi; Najat Mouine; Zouhair Lakhal; Aatif Benyass
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-11-19

6.  Trends in percutaneous coronary interventions in new South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Daminda P Weerasinghe; Farhat Yusuf; Nicholas J Parr
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.