Literature DB >> 10223485

Transrectal ultrasound with separate measurement of the transition zone volume predicts the short-term outcome after transurethral resection of the prostate.

S Bergdahl1, G Aus, P Lodding, L Norlén, J Hugosson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the volume of prostatic adenomas as assessed by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) influenced the outcome after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).
METHODS: TRUS with total prostate and transition zone (TZ) volume determinations was performed preoperatively in 298 consecutive patients undergoing TURP for benign prostatic hyperplasia without prior urodynamic evaluation. Postoperatively, the outcome of surgery was stated as excellent (no or minor remaining symptoms), improved (but with some remaining symptoms), or failure (the same or aggravated symptoms) according to a patient-administered questionnaire. Six possible risk factors were evaluated: TZ volume 20 cc or less, neurologic disorders, previous TURP/transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP), diabetes, indwelling catheter, and age older than 80 years.
RESULTS: Thirty patients (10.1%) had treatment failure, 45 (15.1%) improvement, and 223 (74.8%) had excellent outcome. After subdivision into preoperative TZ volume of 20 cc or less and greater than 20 cc, it was found that the outcomes of 20.9% (n = 19) were failures if the TZ volume was 20 cc or less but only 5.3% (n = 11) if the TZ volume was greater than 20 cc. Additional independent risk factors for failure were neurologic disorders and previous TURP/TUIP. When all patients with risk factors were excluded (TZ volume 20 cc or less, neurologic disorders, previous transurethral surgery, and diabetes), the risk of failure was 3.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a preoperative TZ volume greater than 20 cc and no history of neurologic disorders, previous TURP/TUIP, or diabetes had a very high chance of favorable outcome after TURP, even though no pressure/flow evaluation had been performed preoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10223485     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00053-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  [Guidelines for German urologists on diagnosis of benign prostate syndrome].

Authors:  R Berges; K Dreikorn; K Höfner; U Jonas; K U Laval; S Madersbacher; M C Michel; R Muschter; M Oelke; L Pientka; C Tschuschke; U Tunn; K Schalkhäuser; B Göckel-Beining; A Heidenreich; H Rübben; K Schalkhäuser; W Thon; J Thüroff; W Weidner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Diagnostic and differential diagnosis of benign prostate syndrome (BPS): guidelines of the German Urologists].

Authors:  R Berges; K Dreikorn; K Höfner; S Madersbacher; M C Michel; R Muschter; M Oelke; O Reich; W Rulf; C Tschuschke; U Tunn
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Predicting the resected tissue weight from a digital rectal examination and total prostate specific antigen level before transurethral resection of the prostate.

Authors:  Ahmed M Harraz; Ahmed El-Assmy; Mohamed Tharwat; Ahmed M Elshal; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Tamer S Barakat; Mohamed M Elsaadany; Samer El-Halwagy; El Housseiny I Ibrahiem
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2014-11-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.