Literature DB >> 10222534

Anterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. A comparison of clinical results.

N H Kim1, J W Lee.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Clinical and radiographic results were assessed in adult patients who had undergone operation for isthmic spondylolisthesis.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the results between anterior interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion with those of transpedicular fixation for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. BACKGROUND DATA: Successful clinical results after fusion can be expected in adolescents, but the adult type differs in that stability through fusion alone fails to ensure satisfactory outcomes. The role of decompression in the surgical treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis remains controversial. Anterior interbody fusion has an indirect effect of nerve root decompression through widening of the intervertebral space, whereas posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation provides direct decompression.
METHODS: The clinical data of 40 adult patients who had undergone operations for isthmic spondylolithesis from June 1977 through June 1994 were reviewed. Anterior interbody fusion was performed in 20 patients (Group I) and posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation in 20 patients (Group II). The mean age of Group I was 44.1 years (range, 21-62 years), and that of Group II was 41.3 years (range, 21-57 years). Group I contained B men and 12 women, Group II contained 5 men and 15 women. The symptoms and signs in Groups I and II were similar. The duration of follow-up averaged 3.6 years (range, 1.1-16 years) in Group I and 2.3 years (range, 1.1-6 years) in Group II.
RESULTS: The anterior slippage in Group I, assessed by the Taillard method, was 16.1% and was corrected to 10.4% after surgery. Anterior slippage in Group II was 15.2% and was corrected to 9.8% after surgery. The fusion rate 12 months after surgery was 90% in Group I and 95% in Group II. The clinical results were analyzed by Kim's criteria, according to variables on the improvement of clinical symptoms. Satisfactory results were obtained in 85% of Group I and 90% of Group II.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in clinical results between anterior interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults (P < 0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10222534     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199904150-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  24 in total

1.  Selective instrumentation, reduction and repair in low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Oscar Morelos; Alfredo O Pozzo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Fusion for low-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Wilco C H Jacobs; Arnold Vreeling; Marinus De Kleuver
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  In situ instrumented posterolateral fusion without decompression in symptomatic low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults.

Authors:  Mohammed Farooq Butt; Shabir Ahmed Dhar; Imtiyaz Hakeem; Munir Farooq; Manzoor Ahmed Halwai; Mohammad Ramzan Mir; Khursheed Ahmed Kangu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Analysis of factors related to prognosis and curative effect for posterolateral fusion of lumbar low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Feng Ming-li; Shen Hui-liang; Yong Yi-min; Hu Huai-jian; Zhang Qing-ming
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  A systematic review with meta-analysis of posterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Liu; Yipeng Wang; Guixing Qiu; Xisheng Weng; Bin Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Minimally invasive surgery procedure in isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli; Maria Concetta Meluzio; Aaron Burrofato; Andrea Perna; Luca Proietti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The effects of ketorolac injected via patient controlled analgesia postoperatively on spinal fusion.

Authors:  Si-Young Park; Seong-Hwan Moon; Moon-Soo Park; Kyung-Soo Oh; Hwan-Mo Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Safety and efficacy of pedicle screws and titanium mesh cage in the treatments of tuberculous spondylitis of the thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  Jae Chul Lee; Yon-Il Kim; Byung-Joon Shin
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31

9.  Comparison between Instrumented Mini-TLIF and Instrumented Circumferential Fusion in Adult Low-Grade Lytic Spondylolisthesis : Can Mini-TLIF with PPF Replace Circumferential Fusion?

Authors:  Jin-Sung Kim; Dong-Hyun Kim; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-02-28

10.  Comparative study of laparoscopic L5-S1 fusion versus open mini-ALIF, with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Sang Ki Chung; Sang Ho Lee; Sang Rak Lim; Dong-Yun Kim; Jee Soo Jang; Ki-Se Nam; Ho Yeon Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.