Literature DB >> 10222512

Improving understanding of the informed consent process and document.

C D Meade1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review theoretical perspectives relating to the communication of informed consent and to describe research efforts and strategies to enhance the informed consent process and document. DATA SOURCES: Research studies review articles, education and communication models, and NCI National Working Group on Informed Consent Recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: Information communicated during the informed consent process is difficult to understand, raising ethical concerns about whether informed decision-making has taken place. Empirical research focuses on the nature of patient-provider interactions and the effectiveness of various delivery systems, a need exists to overcome conceptual and methodologic limitations. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses must ensure that patients understand informed consent information. Several communication strategies are posited.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10222512     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-2081(99)80070-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs        ISSN: 0749-2081            Impact factor:   2.315


  9 in total

Review 1.  Promoting health literacy.

Authors:  Alexa T McCray
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Ethical issues in conducting research with deaf populations.

Authors:  Michael McKee; Deirdre Schlehofer; Denise Thew
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The impact of an educational DVD on cancer patients considering participation in a phase I clinical trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Strevel; Colin Newman; Gregory R Pond; Martha MacLean; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.359

4.  The ethics of withdrawal from study participation.

Authors:  Elisa J Gordon; Thomas R Prohaska
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.057

5.  Informed consent in clinical research: Consensus recommendations for reform identified by an expert interview panel.

Authors:  Beverly H Lorell; J Stephen Mikita; Annick Anderson; Zachary P Hallinan; Annemarie Forrest
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  ". . . I've Gone Through This My Own Self, So I Practice What I Preach . . . ".

Authors:  Catherine Slack; Siya Thabethe; Graham Lindegger; Limba Matandika; Peter A Newman; Philippa Kerr; Doug Wassenaar; Surita Roux; Linda-Gail Bekker
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Examining study participants' decision-making and ethics-related experiences in a dietary community randomized controlled trial in Malawi.

Authors:  Limbanazo Matandika; Kate Millar; Eric Umar; Edward Joy; Gabriella Chiutsi-Phiri; Joseph Mfutso-Bengo
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Experiences and challenges faced by patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalised and participated in a randomised controlled trial: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lukas Hofstetter; Viktoria Tinhof; Hannah Mayfurth; Amelie Kurnikowski; Vincent Rathkolb; Roman Reindl-Schwaighofer; Marianna Traugott; Sara Omid; Alexander Zoufaly; Allison Tong; Ulrich Kropiunigg; Manfred Hecking
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Lika Nusbaum; Brenda Douglas; Karla Damus; Michael Paasche-Orlow; Neenah Estrella-Luna
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2017-09-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.