Literature DB >> 10222395

Recovery of 15N-lactoferrin is higher than that of 15N-casein in the small intestine of suckling, but not adult miniature pigs.

K Drescher1, N Roos, M Pfeuffer, H M Seyfert, J Schrezenmeir, H Hagemeister.   

Abstract

Performance of biological functions of lactoferrin in the small intestine requires at least some resistance to degradation. Therefore, we studied prececal digestibility of lactoferrin in comparison to casein both in suckling and adult miniature pigs, applying 15N-labeled proteins. In study 1, 43 piglets (10-d-old), deprived of food for 12 h received 10 mL of sow's milk supplemented with 120 mg of 15N-labeled protein (porcine or bovine lactoferrin or bovine casein). Piglets were anesthetized 150 min later, after which the small intestine was excised, cut into three sections, and chyme was collected. In study 2, nine food-deprived boars fitted with T-canulae at the terminal ileum were given two semisynthetic experimental meals (204 g) in a cross-over design, 2 wk apart. One contained 7.5% (g/100 g) 15N-labeled bovine casein, the other 1.25% 15N-labeled bovine lactoferrin. Both were adjusted to 15% total protein with nonlabeled casein. Ileal chyme was collected from the canula over 33 h postprandially. All diets contained the indigestible marker chromic oxide. 15N-digestibility of lactoferrin, both porcine (84.4 +/- 3.2%) and bovine (82.3 +/- 4.8%), was significantly lower than casein digestibility (97.6 +/- 0.5%) in the distal small intestine of suckling piglets (P < 0.05). Based on immunoblotting after acrylamide electrophoresis, 4.5% of non- and partially digested lactoferrin was found in the last third of the small intestine of piglets. In adult miniature pigs there was no difference in 15N-digestibility of bovine lactoferrin compared to bovine casein (90.7 +/- 1.9% vs. 93.9 +/- 1.0%, P > 0.05). In suckling miniature pigs, the reduced digestibility of lactoferrin may provide the prerequisite for biological actions along the whole intestinal tract. The source of lactoferrin, porcine or bovine, made no difference in this respect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10222395     DOI: 10.1093/jn/129.5.1026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  3 in total

1.  Immobilization of infant fecal microbiota and utilization in an in vitro colonic fermentation model.

Authors:  C Cinquin; G Le Blay; I Fliss; C Lacroix
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 2.  Bioactive peptides and proteins from foods: indication for health effects.

Authors:  Niels Peter Möller; Katharina Elisabeth Scholz-Ahrens; Nils Roos; Jürgen Schrezenmeir
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  Bovine lactoferrin decreases cholera-toxin-induced intestinal fluid accumulation in mice by ganglioside interaction.

Authors:  Fulton P Rivera; Anicia M Medina; Sandra Bezada; Roberto Valencia; María Bernal; Rina Meza; Ryan C Maves; Theresa J Ochoa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.