Literature DB >> 10222106

Genetic approaches to neurotrauma research: opportunities and potential pitfalls of murine models.

O Steward1, P E Schauwecker, L Guth, Z Zhang, M Fujiki, D Inman, J Wrathall, G Kempermann, F H Gage, K E Saatman, R Raghupathi, T McIntosh.   

Abstract

Genetic strategies provide new ways to define the molecular cascades that regulate the responses of the mammalian nervous system to injury. Genetic interventions also provide opportunities to manipulate and control key molecular steps in these cascades, so as to modify the outcome of CNS injury. Most current genetic strategies involve the use of mice, an animal that has not heretofore been used extensively for neurotrauma research. Therefore, one purpose of the present review is to consider how mice respond to neural trauma, focusing especially on recent information that reveals important differences between mice and rats, and between different inbred strains of mice. The second aim of this review is to provide a brief introduction to the opportunities, caveats, and potential pitfalls of studies that use genetically modified animals for neurotrauma research. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10222106     DOI: 10.1006/exnr.1999.7040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  35 in total

Review 1.  Adult neurogenesis in mammals: an identity crisis.

Authors:  Pasko Rakic
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Strain-dependent differences in calcium signaling predict excitotoxicity in murine hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  C W Shuttleworth; J A Connor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  FGF-2 regulates neurogenesis and degeneration in the dentate gyrus after traumatic brain injury in mice.

Authors:  Shinichi Yoshimura; Tetsuyuki Teramoto; Michael J Whalen; Michael C Irizarry; Yasushi Takagi; Jianhua Qiu; Jun Harada; Christian Waeber; Xandra O Breakefield; Michael A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Comparative analysis of lesion development and intraspinal inflammation in four strains of mice following spinal contusion injury.

Authors:  Kristina A Kigerl; Violeta M McGaughy; Phillip G Popovich
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 5.  Cell cycle activation and spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Junfang Wu; Bogdan A Stoica; Alan I Faden
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 6.  Hydrogels in spinal cord injury repair strategies.

Authors:  Giuseppe Perale; Filippo Rossi; Erik Sundstrom; Sara Bacchiega; Maurizio Masi; Gianluigi Forloni; Pietro Veglianese
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 4.418

7.  Blockage of lysophosphatidic acid signaling improves spinal cord injury outcomes.

Authors:  Yona Goldshmit; Rosalia Matteo; Tamar Sztal; Felix Ellett; Frisca Frisca; Kelli Moreno; Duncan Crombie; Graham J Lieschke; Peter D Currie; Roger A Sabbadini; Alice Pébay
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 8.  Translational spinal cord injury research: preclinical guidelines and challenges.

Authors:  Paul J Reier; Michael A Lane; Edward D Hall; Y D Teng; Dena R Howland
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2012

Review 9.  Chronic Histopathological and Behavioral Outcomes of Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury in Adult Male Animals.

Authors:  Nicole D Osier; Shaun W Carlson; Anthony DeSana; C Edward Dixon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Evaluating regional blood spinal cord barrier dysfunction following spinal cord injury using longitudinal dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Ilkan Tatar; Peter Cheng-te Chou; Mohamed Mokhtar Desouki; Hanaa El Sayed; Mehmet Bilgen
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.